由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - Nature News: NgAgo gene-editing controversy escalates in peer-reviewed papers
相关主题
Nature News: The controversy over NgAgoIamback又向澳洲哥开火了
转 “韩春雨撤回论文”那家报道最狠?日本研究人员按照新的NgAgo要求来实验,没有发现NgAgo有作用。
韩春雨的工作重复得怎么样了?韩春雨回应成果被质疑:《自然》已证实实验可重复!!
Knoepfler 也终于盯上韩春雨了?澎湃第三弹:自然报道不应作为韩春雨实验可重复的证据
国际媒体对韩春雨NgAgo论文被撤的反应特别记录 Global Times 2016.10.12 【记录历史】谁重复验证了NgAgo?
不赞成现在把关于韩春雨NgAgo的讨论翻译成英文给洋鬼子关于NgAgo的一些吐槽
DNA Electrophoresis, Image Manipulation and so on so forthQuestions about NgAgo
关于HAN讨论的一点建议研究genetic editing的tool前景怎样?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: ngago话题: nature话题: he话题: says
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
n***p
发帖数: 79
1
http://www.nature.com/news/ngago-gene-editing-controversy-escalates-in-peer-reviewed-papers-1.21023
摘录:
- Wensheng Wei, a molecular biologist at Peking University has already made
his mind up about NgAgo. “It simply doesn't work, period,” he says.
- Han told Nature he has discovered a problem that would not have been
obvious to others and that could explain why others are having difficulty
replicating his results. He says that he is currently running confirmatory
experiments so that he can publish data and a protocol that satisfies his
critics. “I cannot say right now because the media in China jumps on
everything I say,” he told Nature. “I need a little bit of time.”
- One of the few scientists who previously told Nature he had corroborated
Han’s findings – but has not published these results – now says that he
is using NgAgo for experiments related to his research, and that he hopes to
publish soon. But another who previously noted positive initial results
with NgAgo says now that the “data are confusing” and “we cannot make a
conclusion”. Neither wanted to be named for fear of being dragged into the
controversy.
z*******x
发帖数: 103
2
BT 的行为很奇怪,说调查,有不告诉进展。
从记录来看,BT 在过去发表料很多有争议的结果。但撤得少。
1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
研究genetic editing的tool前景怎样?国际媒体对韩春雨NgAgo论文被撤的反应
NgAgo survey result不赞成现在把关于韩春雨NgAgo的讨论翻译成英文给洋鬼子
Nature及其子刊将强制数据共享,推进科研可重复性DNA Electrophoresis, Image Manipulation and so on so forth
To Edit or Not: The NgAgo Story关于HAN讨论的一点建议
Nature News: The controversy over NgAgoIamback又向澳洲哥开火了
转 “韩春雨撤回论文”那家报道最狠?日本研究人员按照新的NgAgo要求来实验,没有发现NgAgo有作用。
韩春雨的工作重复得怎么样了?韩春雨回应成果被质疑:《自然》已证实实验可重复!!
Knoepfler 也终于盯上韩春雨了?澎湃第三弹:自然报道不应作为韩春雨实验可重复的证据
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: ngago话题: nature话题: he话题: says