P****R
发帖数: 22479 | 1 今天很早起来出差，没赶上今天的热点事件。晚上回来一看，这个话题火得不得了。感
觉不写点不好。就先查查媒体报道，看了半天，觉得国内中文媒体还算客气。如：
韩春雨回应主动撤回基因编辑论文:理解万岁
《自然》子刊发社论回应:韩春雨的研究仍有意义
韩春雨已从《自然-生物技术》撤回争议论文
但有一家网站的文章可不客气，直接用了这个词“academic fraud”。见：
Han Chunyu academic fraud dust settles? The manuscript of Nature...
www.bestchinanews.com/Science-Technology/12180.html
文章中下一段最不客气：“Finally, what we all care about is whether Han
Chunyu will face further treatment Five ministries recently severely
punished the authors involved in the 107 papers of "tumor biology". However,
the nature of the 107 withdrawal events is relatively simple, while the
NgAgo is vague and controversial to a certain extent. What measures will be
taken by the relevant departments, I believe we will wait and see.”
话说回来，《自然-生物技术》现在才撤回争议论文，时间耐人寻味，因为刚刚影响因
子公布不久，而“As of press time, NgAgo this article in Website of Science
has been cited 53 times, ranked Highly Cited Paper. Google Scholar also
shows that it has been cited 116 times”。撤回的论文毕竟对它的影响因子是有贡
献的。
“The data have spoken:” Controversial NgAgo gene editing study retracted
Retraction Watch |
|
