A*****8
发帖数: 1948 | | A****S
发帖数: 978 | 2 Oct or Nov of 2006
【在 A*****8 的大作中提到】
: RT,谢谢
| T****k
发帖数: 1374 | | l****6
发帖数: 159 | 4 Could you tell us the reason why it will enter 2007?
Thank you
【在 T****k 的大作中提到】
: 应该进入07年。
| s******0
发帖数: 1340 | 5 剩余名额呀.
【在 l****6 的大作中提到】
: Could you tell us the reason why it will enter 2007?
: Thank you
| r****e
发帖数: 3109 | 6 今年夏天EB2C还能指望上剩余名额吗？
【在 s******0 的大作中提到】
: 剩余名额呀.
| s**u
发帖数: 9035 | 7 See below:
发信人: shmu (shmu), 信区: EB23
标 题: 2011年9月的排期
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Dec 19 11:47:33 2010, 美东)
2011年9月的排期
If spillover number is 5000, EB2 india is 8/22/2006, EB2 China is 9/22/2006
If spillover number is 6000, EB2 india is 9/8/2006, EB2 China is 9/22/2006
If spillover number is 7000, EB2 india is 9/22/2006, EB2 China is 9/22/2006
If spillover number is 8000, EB2 india is 10/1/2006, EB2 China is 10/1/2006
If spillover number is 9000, EB2 india is 10/8/2006, EB2 China is 10/8/2006
In FY 2009, there were 7200 spillover number, India got 7000. China got 140,
PD for both were 1/8/2005. FY 2011 is quite similar to FY 2009. Some people
said if spillover is 20000, then both CI will move to Jan 2007, but I do
not think so.
【在 A*****8 的大作中提到】
: RT,谢谢
| s*******s
发帖数: 501 | 8 So can you also predict the same for Sep 2012?
2006
2006
2006
2006
【在 s**u 的大作中提到】
: See below:
: 发信人: shmu (shmu), 信区: EB23
: 标 题: 2011年9月的排期
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Dec 19 11:47:33 2010, 美东)
: 2011年9月的排期
: If spillover number is 5000, EB2 india is 8/22/2006, EB2 China is 9/22/2006
: If spillover number is 6000, EB2 india is 9/8/2006, EB2 China is 9/22/2006
: If spillover number is 7000, EB2 india is 9/22/2006, EB2 China is 9/22/2006
: If spillover number is 8000, EB2 india is 10/1/2006, EB2 China is 10/1/2006
: If spillover number is 9000, EB2 india is 10/8/2006, EB2 China is 10/8/2006
|
|
