a******g 发帖数: 725 | 1 到底有没有?
从o的说发来看,row 可能会出现排期。也就是eb2
名额4w 所剩不足以供应row在财年末前的需求。row 吃不了so.
eb145的剩余只能让ic吃。
那么就看eb1c 烙印多不多,他们能把so全吞了,那么今年就到此为止了。所以烙印论坛
上早就发现问题严重性并请愿了 |
a*******d 发帖数: 4846 | |
n***s 发帖数: 10056 | 3
This is definitely not right. SO would go to EB2ROW first as it's from
EB1ROW. Left over from EB2ROW then go to EB2IC.
【在 a******g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 到底有没有? : 从o的说发来看,row 可能会出现排期。也就是eb2 : 名额4w 所剩不足以供应row在财年末前的需求。row 吃不了so. : eb145的剩余只能让ic吃。 : 那么就看eb1c 烙印多不多,他们能把so全吞了,那么今年就到此为止了。所以烙印论坛 : 上早就发现问题严重性并请愿了
|
g*****n 发帖数: 2588 | 4
在决定SO给ROW还是IC的时候,不讲先来先得?那就像我前几天主张的那样,如果EB1-
China有剩余应该先给Eb2C了
【在 n***s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : : This is definitely not right. SO would go to EB2ROW first as it's from : EB1ROW. Left over from EB2ROW then go to EB2IC.
|
n***s 发帖数: 10056 | 5 Yes, only if EB1-China has SO. But, EB1-China each year uses over 4000. No
SO at all.
EB1ROW SO go to EB2ROW first, then to EB2CI, if there is any left.
【在 g*****n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : : 在决定SO给ROW还是IC的时候,不讲先来先得?那就像我前几天主张的那样,如果EB1- : China有剩余应该先给Eb2C了
|
a******g 发帖数: 725 | 6 这个依据呢?有点想当然
【在 n***s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Yes, only if EB1-China has SO. But, EB1-China each year uses over 4000. No : SO at all. : EB1ROW SO go to EB2ROW first, then to EB2CI, if there is any left.
|
a******g 发帖数: 725 | 7 这个依据呢?有点想当然
【在 n***s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Yes, only if EB1-China has SO. But, EB1-China each year uses over 4000. No : SO at all. : EB1ROW SO go to EB2ROW first, then to EB2CI, if there is any left.
|
N****g 发帖数: 2829 | 8 He's right, EB2-ROW always has higher priority than EB-2IC because of 7% per
country rule. Once a country is expected to have more than 7% FB+EB, AND
its EB-2 is expected to be more than 2803, it will join EB-2 C and I's lower
priority club.
【在 a******g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这个依据呢?有点想当然
|