a*******n
发帖数: 38 | 1 不好意思 借用贵宝地请教个问题，我现在h1b第四年 如果一切顺利10月拿到140但是新
跳槽的公司可能没有办法办理绿卡， 新公司的这个职位和前景特别喜欢，考虑工作一
年以后再跳槽继续办理绿卡。但是我不知道像我这样绿卡已近开始办了，中间停一年再
找一家重新办的话是可以的么?还有新的公司公司可以拿我现在公司的140来延我的h1b
么？ 非常感谢！！ |
m****7
发帖数: 329 | 2 可以，但是我的个人理解，有很多限制因素。
假如给你办140的现任公司是A，不给你办绿卡的公司是B，再之后的公司是C。
B能借A给你办的140拿到3年的H1B，在此期间，如果A不撤回140，你可以拿着同一份140
跳到C，再拿三年H1B，然后再办一次绿卡流程。
问题就在于“如果A不撤回140”。小公司可能比较大条，会忘记撤回；大公司很多有规
章制度，一旦员工离职必须撤回。这样的话，情势就直转直下了。你想从B去C的唯一可
能性，就是在B公司H1B有效的三年期内跳槽。否则三年到期，你不仅不能去C，也不能
留在B，必须回国一年，再由C帮你申H1B。
不过只是我的看法，不知道有无不对的地方。 |
a*******n
发帖数: 38 | 3 谢谢这么详细的答复！！但是我有看到一种说法是只要老的140不是因为欺诈而被
revoke那么以后新的140都是可以relink到老的额140的PD的？ |
f*******8
发帖数: 1430 | 4 这个政策可能要改。你可能要小心些。
根据www.immigration-law.com
05/26/2015: Watch for USCIS Position on BIA Unpublished Decision on Loss of
Retention of Earlier Priority Date of Approved I-140 When Employer Withdraws
it
The USCIS recent decision of its policy on issue of requirement for amended
H-1B petition for relocation of H-1B employees taking it as a material
change was a mixed bag of conservative and liberal policies of the agency
for the H-1B employers in a way. In the form of a "precedent" decision of
AAO, the USCIS firmly made its policy that the agency would no longer
tolerate the employers moving H-1B employees around without contacting and
receiving approval of such relocation from the USCIS.
There are many and many foreign high tech workers who have attained I-140
petitions (mostly EB-3) and changed the employers that sponsored a new PERM
application and obtained new I-140 petitions (mostly EB-2). Upto now, there
have been no problem in recapturing earlier priority date from the earlier
approved I-140 case in the new employer's new I-140 petition, even if the
former employer withdrew the aprpoved I-140 petition. This was available
because of the USCIS regulation that provides that earlier priority can be
retained. Immigration legal community, employers, and foreign workers have
assumed that only situation where the retained priority date is lost is when
the USCIS revokes the approved I-140 petition on fraud or misrepresentation
or error in facts and laws in the decision of the earlier I-140 petition.
They thought revocation of the earlier approved I-140 petition by the USCIS
based on the employer's withdrawal would not affect the retention of the
priority date.
On November 19, 2014, the Board of Immigration Appeals handed down an
unpublished decision in Grace Estrellado with an opinion in dictum that
employer's withdrawal and subsequent revocation of the earlier approved I-
140 petition by the agency takes away the retained priority date. Even
though it was a dictum and unpublished decision, the immigration legal
community has been in the storm of controversity and debate over its
potential impact on the USCIS position on this issue. Foreign workers should
watch development of the USCIS policy on this issue along the way. Those
with approved I-140 petition are currently elated by the Obama's immigration
action opening them in the future an opportunity to change employers
without affecting the green card jouney with the preregistration or I-140
EAD, but they should also be mindful of this development on the U.S.
Department of Justice Board of Immigration Appeals and closely watch and
follow reactions of the adjudicators in the Service Centers after this
decision. After the decision, most of lawyers are no longer advising their
clients that earlier priority date is definitely retained when former
employer withdraws and subsequently the USCIS reovoked the approved I-140
petition.
【在 a*******n 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢这么详细的答复！！但是我有看到一种说法是只要老的140不是因为欺诈而被
: revoke那么以后新的140都是可以relink到老的额140的PD的？
|
g********f
发帖数: 1112 | 5 要是不能保留pd,那岂不是每换一个公司或地点，都要从头排队。这完全和移民改革背
道而驰啊。
of
Withdraws
amended
【在 f*******8 的大作中提到】
: 这个政策可能要改。你可能要小心些。
: 根据www.immigration-law.com
: 05/26/2015: Watch for USCIS Position on BIA Unpublished Decision on Loss of
: Retention of Earlier Priority Date of Approved I-140 When Employer Withdraws
: it
: The USCIS recent decision of its policy on issue of requirement for amended
: H-1B petition for relocation of H-1B employees taking it as a material
: change was a mixed bag of conservative and liberal policies of the agency
: for the H-1B employers in a way. In the form of a "precedent" decision of
: AAO, the USCIS firmly made its policy that the agency would no longer
|
a*******n
发帖数: 38 | 6 谢谢信息！我都不知道还有这些！ 但是读了一下好像只是appeal阶段？好像还没有开
始实行？ |
z****3
发帖数: 782 | 7 This is only an unpublished dictum and not the official policy yet.
【在 a*******n 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢信息！我都不知道还有这些！ 但是读了一下好像只是appeal阶段？好像还没有开
: 始实行？
|
