v*********s
发帖数: 17 | 1 china only had economics, in its strict scientific definition as a subject
studied methodologically, systematically and mathematically, only briefly.
that was the period when Luo Zhi Ru (1934, harverd phd, Li Yi Ning's
professor) opened "Introduction to Western Economics" in Bei Da in early
1950s. if I rememebered correctly, it was shut down in 1956. We then lost the
contact with world in the development of economics and went on a totally
bizare and wrong track. It has not been restored in China | j***u
发帖数: 29 | 2 You basically said it. I agree with it.
But dont take for granted that there is no serious and scientific research
going
on in business school. some people in business school sometimes do as serious
and scientific research as most econ guys do; though most people does not.
the
we
【在 v*********s 的大作中提到】
: china only had economics, in its strict scientific definition as a subject
: studied methodologically, systematically and mathematically, only briefly.
: that was the period when Luo Zhi Ru (1934, harverd phd, Li Yi Ning's
: professor) opened "Introduction to Western Economics" in Bei Da in early
: 1950s. if I rememebered correctly, it was shut down in 1956. We then lost the
: contact with world in the development of economics and went on a totally
: bizare and wrong track. It has not been restored in China
| t**e
发帖数: 256 | 3 Just a few comments
1. You don't know much about bschool academically. MBA is different from PHD
in bschool.
2. Even some econ nobel prize winners don't think econ is a science like
physics. Think about it, why?
3. Your mind is too narrow, I don't think it is good for an economist.
Perhaps because you treat econ as a science, you also treat the world too
mechanically. You will lose many chances to learn from the world because your
eyes often times are not open.
No offense.
【 在 virtualboss (bi | v*********s
发帖数: 17 | 4 sorry, i should have made myself more precisely in my statement, when i say
"biz ppl" i basically mean MBA sort. I do acknowledge PhDs in biz area,
especially Finance guys, are pretty hardcore in research. Merton for example.
serious
do,
than
【在 j***u 的大作中提到】
: You basically said it. I agree with it.
: But dont take for granted that there is no serious and scientific research
: going
: on in business school. some people in business school sometimes do as serious
: and scientific research as most econ guys do; though most people does not.
:
: the
: we
| v*********s
发帖数: 17 | 5
PHD
sorry, i should have made myself more precisely in my statement, when i say
"biz ppl" i basically mean MBA sort. I do acknowledge PhDs in biz area,
especially Finance guys, are pretty hardcore in research. Merton for example.
i didn't say i think econ is a hardcore science as physics, did i? I said some
devoted people trying their best to acheive this.
it's more of a philosophical question as to if econ, and if social sci in
general, could ever be a science, given the subjects of their stud
【在 t**e 的大作中提到】
: Just a few comments
: 1. You don't know much about bschool academically. MBA is different from PHD
: in bschool.
: 2. Even some econ nobel prize winners don't think econ is a science like
: physics. Think about it, why?
: 3. Your mind is too narrow, I don't think it is good for an economist.
: Perhaps because you treat econ as a science, you also treat the world too
: mechanically. You will lose many chances to learn from the world because your
: eyes often times are not open.
: No offense.
|
|
