m***d
发帖数: 17 | 1 From http://www.rankingabc.com/?p=155
Does this make sense?
RANKING OF ECONOMICS JOURNALS
CATEGORY I
5 A.E.R.*
5 Econometrica*
5 J.P.E.*
5 Q.J.E.*
5 Rev. Econ. Studies*
4 Econ. Journal
4 International Econ. Review
4 J. Economic Theory
4 J. Econ. Literature
4 J. Monetary Economics
4 Rand Journal
4 Rev. Econ. Statis.
CATEGORY II
I copied part of them. You may check
http://www.rankingabc.com |
h*****0
发帖数: 145 | 2 according to some survey, Econ. Journal is not as good as Game and economic
behavior
For finance department, J. Finance can be better than Econometrica, AER |
h***u
发帖数: 245 | 3 后者不是吧？因为最最好的Finance的paper还是发在AER等等的。呵呵。
economic
【在 h*****0 的大作中提到】
: according to some survey, Econ. Journal is not as good as Game and economic
: behavior
: For finance department, J. Finance can be better than Econometrica, AER
|
m***d
发帖数: 17 | 4 There are some disputes. Some people are arguing using so-called impact
factor. Not sure of which one to follow...
【在 h***u 的大作中提到】
: 后者不是吧？因为最最好的Finance的paper还是发在AER等等的。呵呵。
:
: economic
|
k***g
发帖数: 7244 | 5 简单的 impact factor 也不可靠，07年 AER 按照 impact factor 排，都跌出前十了
，影响因子还没有 journal of economic growth 高，GEB和JET都排到30开外了。。。
【在 m***d 的大作中提到】
: There are some disputes. Some people are arguing using so-called impact
: factor. Not sure of which one to follow...
|
h***u
发帖数: 245 | 6 经济学的IF根本不重要，要这么argue，最好的journal是JEL，而Journal of Health
Economics的IF也相当高，但是这本杂志基本上不在A类。
【在 m***d 的大作中提到】
: There are some disputes. Some people are arguing using so-called impact
: factor. Not sure of which one to follow...
|
l******n
发帖数: 213 | 7 EJ不怎么样。JET显然很好。
JF比JB低？不会吧。据我观察对于finance的人还是AER(JPE)>JF>...
如此多杂志都出现了，econ letter也该出现下吧 |
