由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Economics版 - 不知道算不算黑人说的一点证据
相关主题
[合集] 问一个game theory的问题一篇很全面准确的解析美国金融危机的文章 (转载)
Microeconomic theorists 去咨询公司都是干什么的?突然有一个小问题
经济学理论研究的下坡路还要走多久 纽约时报已经发出interview invitation的国内院校
请教一下做theory的job market复旦管院海归情况
假设可以类比的话,经济学现在的发展状况相当于物理史上什么阶段呢??在投行帮公司上市/融资/并购算是投行的核心业务了吗?
Economics in Crisis2011年度faculty招聘总结(经济学)
请教:关于uncertainty。。。CCER是不是走火入魔了
张五常《中国的经济制度》(全12节)长江经济系正式教授的论文集
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: chicago话题: mit话题: people话题: stanford话题: accounting
进入Economics版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
B******e
发帖数: 16928
1
Chicago accounting今年给了三个faculty offer,一个theorist,,两个empirist,结果
三个都没去,theorist去了Stanford, 两个empirist一个MIT一个Harvard.MIT和Harvard
的accounting无论从哪个方面都无法和Chicago比,Stanford的也不比Chicago强,而且
去Stanford的theorist是Kellogg毕业的,在Chicago应该对和她老板co-author paper
更方便吧。至于教书那三个学校也没有undergraduate,而MBA的expectation决不会比
Chicago低,因此感觉还是Chicago的黑人问题吧,不过有待我下次见了人证实,但是
我想不出还有什么原因。
j****e
发帖数: 35
2
i don't think the bad neighborhood you referred to is a main reason for
those people's choices. stanford has stronger theory people than chicag
o for sure. harvard is a different kind of school and people go there f
or the glamor more than academics. mit is at least equally as good as c
hicago. one thing i can think of is, chicago is notorious in its treatm
ent of junior professors. the record of not giving tenure and kicking p
eople out might have swayed some people's decisions.

Harvard

【在 B******e 的大作中提到】
: Chicago accounting今年给了三个faculty offer,一个theorist,,两个empirist,结果
: 三个都没去,theorist去了Stanford, 两个empirist一个MIT一个Harvard.MIT和Harvard
: 的accounting无论从哪个方面都无法和Chicago比,Stanford的也不比Chicago强,而且
: 去Stanford的theorist是Kellogg毕业的,在Chicago应该对和她老板co-author paper
: 更方便吧。至于教书那三个学校也没有undergraduate,而MBA的expectation决不会比
: Chicago低,因此感觉还是Chicago的黑人问题吧,不过有待我下次见了人证实,但是
: 我想不出还有什么原因。

B******e
发帖数: 16928
3
Basically the point from you is there are too many factors which could be
very difficult to control for. I agree with that.
j****e
发帖数: 35
4
i don't think the bad neighborhood you referred to is a main reason for
those people's choices. stanford has stronger theory people than chicag
o for sure. harvard is a different kind of school and people go there f
or the glamor more than academics. mit is at least equally as good as c
hicago. one thing i can think of is, chicago is notorious in its treatm
ent of junior professors. the record of not giving tenure and kicking p
eople out might have swayed some people's decisions.

Harvard

【在 B******e 的大作中提到】
: Chicago accounting今年给了三个faculty offer,一个theorist,,两个empirist,结果
: 三个都没去,theorist去了Stanford, 两个empirist一个MIT一个Harvard.MIT和Harvard
: 的accounting无论从哪个方面都无法和Chicago比,Stanford的也不比Chicago强,而且
: 去Stanford的theorist是Kellogg毕业的,在Chicago应该对和她老板co-author paper
: 更方便吧。至于教书那三个学校也没有undergraduate,而MBA的expectation决不会比
: Chicago低,因此感觉还是Chicago的黑人问题吧,不过有待我下次见了人证实,但是
: 我想不出还有什么原因。

h*s
发帖数: 574
5
I can give you a true story which helps you understand this from different
angle, rather than focus on your idea of black people effect. First of all,
those decisions are very indiosycratic and cannot be accommodate by a single
effect.
Once upon a time, an econ guy got many top offer, like Princeton, Wharton,
Chicago GSB etc. He chose an dept ranked like 12. When people asked him
why, he said because his girlfriend liked that place (in fact, t
hat place has many black people), and the teaching

【在 B******e 的大作中提到】
: Basically the point from you is there are too many factors which could be
: very difficult to control for. I agree with that.

h*s
发帖数: 574
6
I can give you a true story which helps you understand this from different
angle, rather than focus on your idea of black people effect. First of all,
those decisions are very indiosycratic and cannot be accommodate by a single
effect.
Once upon a time, an econ guy got many top offer, like Princeton, Wharton,
Chicago GSB etc. He chose an dept ranked like 12. When people asked him
why, he said because his girlfriend liked that place (in fact, t
hat place has many black people), and the teaching

【在 B******e 的大作中提到】
: Basically the point from you is there are too many factors which could be
: very difficult to control for. I agree with that.

t*****e
发帖数: 224
7
People on the job market don't know about the neighborhood anyway. How it is
and how it affects life will be revealed to him/her gradually. So I think it
is pointless to base the argument on the job market for new faculty. The job "
market" for seniors, however, may provide evidence, for or against the
argument.
Let me offer a test for this theory. Let's first assume that the job market
for the established seniors is in a kind of equilibrium, in which there is no
systematic incentive for anyone
B******e
发帖数: 16928
8
Basically the point from you is there are too many factors which could be
very difficult to control for. I agree with that.

【在 h*s 的大作中提到】
: I can give you a true story which helps you understand this from different
: angle, rather than focus on your idea of black people effect. First of all,
: those decisions are very indiosycratic and cannot be accommodate by a single
: effect.
: Once upon a time, an econ guy got many top offer, like Princeton, Wharton,
: Chicago GSB etc. He chose an dept ranked like 12. When people asked him
: why, he said because his girlfriend liked that place (in fact, t
: hat place has many black people), and the teaching

B******e
发帖数: 16928
9
I am not saying that for general. For Shin's case, Chicago accounting
is looking for a distinguished theory senior faculty for years, so
they are more eager to hire Shin and that's what I heard,which might not
be true.

only

【在 h*s 的大作中提到】
: I can give you a true story which helps you understand this from different
: angle, rather than focus on your idea of black people effect. First of all,
: those decisions are very indiosycratic and cannot be accommodate by a single
: effect.
: Once upon a time, an econ guy got many top offer, like Princeton, Wharton,
: Chicago GSB etc. He chose an dept ranked like 12. When people asked him
: why, he said because his girlfriend liked that place (in fact, t
: hat place has many black people), and the teaching

h*s
发帖数: 574
10
I partially agree, but I mainly study his papers in accounting courses
and in all other econ and finance courses I have taken, nobody mentioned his
papers. Surely this only reflects some professors preference in designing
courses

not
year
B******e
发帖数: 16928
11
I am not saying that for general. For Shin's case, Chicago accounting
is looking for a distinguished theory senior faculty for years, so
they are more eager to hire Shin and that's what I heard,which might not
be true.

only

【在 h*s 的大作中提到】
: I partially agree, but I mainly study his papers in accounting courses
: and in all other econ and finance courses I have taken, nobody mentioned his
: papers. Surely this only reflects some professors preference in designing
: courses
:
: not
: year

B******e
发帖数: 16928
12
I agree with your comment on Chicago GSB and the first point.
I don't agree with your opinion that MIT accounting is better than Chicago.
MIT has no theorists, and for empirists the best one, Kothari, is not
as good as Ray Ball or Abbie Smith in Chicago. This can also be
judged from the placements of their Ph.D students. Chicago's job market
candidate last year went to Columbia and candidate this year will go to
Wharton, while job market candidates from MIT even rarely got interviews
from those

【在 j****e 的大作中提到】
: i don't think the bad neighborhood you referred to is a main reason for
: those people's choices. stanford has stronger theory people than chicag
: o for sure. harvard is a different kind of school and people go there f
: or the glamor more than academics. mit is at least equally as good as c
: hicago. one thing i can think of is, chicago is notorious in its treatm
: ent of junior professors. the record of not giving tenure and kicking p
: eople out might have swayed some people's decisions.
:
: Harvard

B******e
发帖数: 16928
13
I agree with your comment on Chicago GSB and the first point.
I don't agree with your opinion that MIT accounting is better than Chicago.
MIT has no theorists, and for empirists the best one, Kothari, is not
as good as Ray Ball or Abbie Smith in Chicago. This can also be
judged from the placements of their Ph.D students. Chicago's job market
candidate last year went to Columbia and candidate this year will go to
Wharton, while job market candidates from MIT even rarely got interviews
from those

【在 j****e 的大作中提到】
: i don't think the bad neighborhood you referred to is a main reason for
: those people's choices. stanford has stronger theory people than chicag
: o for sure. harvard is a different kind of school and people go there f
: or the glamor more than academics. mit is at least equally as good as c
: hicago. one thing i can think of is, chicago is notorious in its treatm
: ent of junior professors. the record of not giving tenure and kicking p
: eople out might have swayed some people's decisions.
:
: Harvard

1 (共1页)
进入Economics版参与讨论
相关主题
长江经济系正式教授的论文集假设可以类比的话,经济学现在的发展状况相当于物理史上什么阶段呢??
选择PhD项目Economics in Crisis
A profile of Dr. Frank Bass请教:关于uncertainty。。。
My view on game theory!张五常《中国的经济制度》(全12节)
[合集] 问一个game theory的问题一篇很全面准确的解析美国金融危机的文章 (转载)
Microeconomic theorists 去咨询公司都是干什么的?突然有一个小问题
经济学理论研究的下坡路还要走多久 纽约时报已经发出interview invitation的国内院校
请教一下做theory的job market复旦管院海归情况
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: chicago话题: mit话题: people话题: stanford话题: accounting