d*******l 发帖数: 2567 | |
A********e 发帖数: 354 | 2 havard 投资缩水30%, 斯坦福缩水40%。 |
d*******l 发帖数: 2567 | 3 想起来了,昨天NPR说Golden Sachs最近有record profit,然后要发record bonus.
另一方面是连哈佛也扛不住了。不懂,为什么金融机构经济好的时候take risk,挣
record
profit,结果把经济搞垮,经济不好的时候让大家去救他们,也是record profit。感
觉他们
就是赌桌上坐庄的,从来不赔,不象是私有经济,当然他们生病,我们得吃药。
有没有学金融的解释解释。
【在 d*******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 损失了110亿好像。 : http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2009/06/harvard_u_to_la.html
|
e*****y 发帖数: 1192 | 4 花街本来就是一小撮人骗大部分人钱的地方。
【在 d*******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 想起来了,昨天NPR说Golden Sachs最近有record profit,然后要发record bonus. : 另一方面是连哈佛也扛不住了。不懂,为什么金融机构经济好的时候take risk,挣 : record : profit,结果把经济搞垮,经济不好的时候让大家去救他们,也是record profit。感 : 觉他们 : 就是赌桌上坐庄的,从来不赔,不象是私有经济,当然他们生病,我们得吃药。 : 有没有学金融的解释解释。
|
p*f 发帖数: 77 | 5 It may be good for other schools to catch up or even pass Harvard or
Standford.
【在 d*******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 损失了110亿好像。 : http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2009/06/harvard_u_to_la.html
|
d*******l 发帖数: 2567 | 6 dream on。
【在 p*f 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : It may be good for other schools to catch up or even pass Harvard or : Standford.
|
z*******a 发帖数: 2826 | 7 the goldman sachs and the fed are the culprits of the crisis, which means
they will survive and become stronger than ever...
Harvard will be ok though |
d*******l 发帖数: 2567 | 8 您消消气,大热天的。
NSF,DOE,DOD甚至国内扶持基金那几根狗骨头现在对我都是香喷喷的。钱就是
大爷,用03年物理炸药奖得主Abrikosov的原话来说,"Money is the blood
for research",我当时在一个会议给他当司机正开车,听了頗感震撼。
另外你说的都是明面上大家都看见的。我想有没有研究这个领域的,给点insight. |
S****Y 发帖数: 4634 | 9 Banks are vital to economy and have to be saved when they fail, that's why
they are heavily regulated, although it is widely accepted now that the
current regulation does not work and will need more regulation.
to say that a certain group of people benefits unfairly is plain ridiculous
and this view is mostly held by either someone who doesn't understand how
economy works or someone who does but choose to mislead others.
if someone thinks that GS/MS or other banks/IB will earn abnormal profit,
t
【在 d*******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 您消消气,大热天的。 : NSF,DOE,DOD甚至国内扶持基金那几根狗骨头现在对我都是香喷喷的。钱就是 : 大爷,用03年物理炸药奖得主Abrikosov的原话来说,"Money is the blood : for research",我当时在一个会议给他当司机正开车,听了頗感震撼。 : 另外你说的都是明面上大家都看见的。我想有没有研究这个领域的,给点insight.
|
k*****r 发帖数: 21039 | 10 没人否认银行的作用,但银行怎么运作,为谁的利益服务,就大不一样了。
certain group of people不是个种族概率,是阶级。
ridiculous
,
too
【在 S****Y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Banks are vital to economy and have to be saved when they fail, that's why : they are heavily regulated, although it is widely accepted now that the : current regulation does not work and will need more regulation. : to say that a certain group of people benefits unfairly is plain ridiculous : and this view is mostly held by either someone who doesn't understand how : economy works or someone who does but choose to mislead others. : if someone thinks that GS/MS or other banks/IB will earn abnormal profit, : t
|
|
|
k*****r 发帖数: 21039 | 11 皮之不存,毛将焉附?
知识分子就是毛,不符在米犹金融寡头的皮上,就没法活。
搞经济的多少是在张嘴说胡话,奉旨生气/亢奋/痛心疾首?
【在 d*******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 您消消气,大热天的。 : NSF,DOE,DOD甚至国内扶持基金那几根狗骨头现在对我都是香喷喷的。钱就是 : 大爷,用03年物理炸药奖得主Abrikosov的原话来说,"Money is the blood : for research",我当时在一个会议给他当司机正开车,听了頗感震撼。 : 另外你说的都是明面上大家都看见的。我想有没有研究这个领域的,给点insight.
|
S****Y 发帖数: 4634 | 12 you have no idea what you are talking about,
and one more pa/ga, you will be banned.
【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 没人否认银行的作用,但银行怎么运作,为谁的利益服务,就大不一样了。 : certain group of people不是个种族概率,是阶级。 : : ridiculous : , : too
|
k*****r 发帖数: 21039 | 13 you thought you knew what you are talking about.
【在 S****Y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : you have no idea what you are talking about, : and one more pa/ga, you will be banned.
|
d*******l 发帖数: 2567 | 14 Too big to fail! I'd love to be the one!
Now credit is such a premium. 偶深有体会。相比之下,还是刚才那哥们
不齿的从NSF来的狗骨头更爽,No String Attached! Oh yeah!
ridiculous
,
too
【在 S****Y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Banks are vital to economy and have to be saved when they fail, that's why : they are heavily regulated, although it is widely accepted now that the : current regulation does not work and will need more regulation. : to say that a certain group of people benefits unfairly is plain ridiculous : and this view is mostly held by either someone who doesn't understand how : economy works or someone who does but choose to mislead others. : if someone thinks that GS/MS or other banks/IB will earn abnormal profit, : t
|
a**********d 发帖数: 2293 | 15 GS平时就比较特立独行,加上跟Washington的关系,在诸多IB里绝对算得上个异数,这
年景除了它没听说过还有谁是record profit。 |
a**********d 发帖数: 2293 | 16 From what I've heard, Goldman Sachs has always been the more cautious one.
【在 d*******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 想起来了,昨天NPR说Golden Sachs最近有record profit,然后要发record bonus. : 另一方面是连哈佛也扛不住了。不懂,为什么金融机构经济好的时候take risk,挣 : record : profit,结果把经济搞垮,经济不好的时候让大家去救他们,也是record profit。感 : 觉他们 : 就是赌桌上坐庄的,从来不赔,不象是私有经济,当然他们生病,我们得吃药。 : 有没有学金融的解释解释。
|
S****Y 发帖数: 4634 | 17 most academic research are not for profit, and sponsored by non-profit
organization anyway. so, you are all deemed "too important to fail".
【在 d*******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Too big to fail! I'd love to be the one! : Now credit is such a premium. 偶深有体会。相比之下,还是刚才那哥们 : 不齿的从NSF来的狗骨头更爽,No String Attached! Oh yeah! : : ridiculous : , : too
|
S****Y 发帖数: 4634 | 18 with the bankruptcy of Lehman and the withdrawal of various other investment
banks, GS is facing much less competition. record profits are due to the
larger spreads, and the recovery of the market. however, GS is not an IB any
more. It couldn't have survived as one.
【在 a**********d 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : GS平时就比较特立独行,加上跟Washington的关系,在诸多IB里绝对算得上个异数,这 : 年景除了它没听说过还有谁是record profit。
|
d*******l 发帖数: 2567 | 19 Awesome. Now we're earning low pay 'cause we're non-profit. And "we" the
public who make little should bail out those big banks 'cause they are too
big to fail even though they messed it up in the first place. What? Record
bonus? Well, that's the only way to retain its top traders because they're
for profit.Plain and simple.
Aha,outrage is never my way. So "we" shall just suck it up and move on.
Wait, there is something positive out of this discussion. That is:
raking up profit in private sector
【在 S****Y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : most academic research are not for profit, and sponsored by non-profit : organization anyway. so, you are all deemed "too important to fail".
|
S****Y 发帖数: 4634 | 20 nobody says your earnings is because of non-profit. however much you are
earning right now is because that is your market value, mostly determined by
supply and demand. how many of you are there and how many of you the market
needs, in the long term, determined by the value of your work.
it is not the public who bail out the banks, it's the taxpayers, 40% of
americans don't pay tax and they bail out nothing. the taxpayers will suffer
more if they don't bail out because economy will suffer and ev
【在 d*******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Awesome. Now we're earning low pay 'cause we're non-profit. And "we" the : public who make little should bail out those big banks 'cause they are too : big to fail even though they messed it up in the first place. What? Record : bonus? Well, that's the only way to retain its top traders because they're : for profit.Plain and simple. : Aha,outrage is never my way. So "we" shall just suck it up and move on. : Wait, there is something positive out of this discussion. That is: : raking up profit in private sector
|
|
|
d*******l 发帖数: 2567 | 21 Points taken. what you said simply illustrates how the public-wait-
taxpayers are hijacked. Supply and demand is such an old and powerful
mechanism that we sometimes tend to forget. Yet my poor little
social conscientiousness smells something fishy, something unfair
when I heard massive layoffs. While we maneuver ourselves through
this life turmoil, maybe social elitism isn't such a cliche. We
the learned may have to take the pills for now, but we'll emerge
sooner and stronger. Hey, if we can't
【在 S****Y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : nobody says your earnings is because of non-profit. however much you are : earning right now is because that is your market value, mostly determined by : supply and demand. how many of you are there and how many of you the market : needs, in the long term, determined by the value of your work. : it is not the public who bail out the banks, it's the taxpayers, 40% of : americans don't pay tax and they bail out nothing. the taxpayers will suffer : more if they don't bail out because economy will suffer and ev
|
S****Y 发帖数: 4634 | 22 yes, it is forced to save them, which is why the banks ain't supposed to
take those risks at the beginning. there were regulations to prevent them
from doing so, which failed squarely.
what do you feel about the government saving Ford, GM and Chrysler then?
the massive layoff and the recession ain't really the IB's fault. but that's
a longer story.
【在 d*******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Points taken. what you said simply illustrates how the public-wait- : taxpayers are hijacked. Supply and demand is such an old and powerful : mechanism that we sometimes tend to forget. Yet my poor little : social conscientiousness smells something fishy, something unfair : when I heard massive layoffs. While we maneuver ourselves through : this life turmoil, maybe social elitism isn't such a cliche. We : the learned may have to take the pills for now, but we'll emerge : sooner and stronger. Hey, if we can't
|
d*******l 发帖数: 2567 | 23 If you scroll back your mitbbs page, your web browser might still have your
original text. I'm curious how you reached your opinions.
I gather, all things happen for a reason, or reasons. It's messy and scary
so people got to find a way out. Cut the loss and move on. Let the devil
take
the hindermost. What shocked me the most is that how things were played out
and
how old fashion, raw social Darwinism dominates at the highest level of our
economy.
As for whose fault it was, I'm pretty sure there
【在 S****Y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : yes, it is forced to save them, which is why the banks ain't supposed to : take those risks at the beginning. there were regulations to prevent them : from doing so, which failed squarely. : what do you feel about the government saving Ford, GM and Chrysler then? : the massive layoff and the recession ain't really the IB's fault. but that's : a longer story.
|
e*****y 发帖数: 1192 | 24 美国的根本基础就是建立在金融系统上的呵。我们中国不是也有很多制度上的毛病嘛。 |
a**********d 发帖数: 2293 | 25 I am with you, DB.
your
out
our
【在 d*******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : If you scroll back your mitbbs page, your web browser might still have your : original text. I'm curious how you reached your opinions. : I gather, all things happen for a reason, or reasons. It's messy and scary : so people got to find a way out. Cut the loss and move on. Let the devil : take : the hindermost. What shocked me the most is that how things were played out : and : how old fashion, raw social Darwinism dominates at the highest level of our : economy. : As for whose fault it was, I'm pretty sure there
|
z*******a 发帖数: 2826 | 26 so you trust the accounting
so you think companies like GS will link their stock price to their actual
earning
so you think regulations will do the job fairly and work
so you know where the problem comes from
so you think the real money is earned through working for a company
......
pretty much everything you said is not wrong. however, the real issue is not
about what you said.
ridiculous
,
too
【在 S****Y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Banks are vital to economy and have to be saved when they fail, that's why : they are heavily regulated, although it is widely accepted now that the : current regulation does not work and will need more regulation. : to say that a certain group of people benefits unfairly is plain ridiculous : and this view is mostly held by either someone who doesn't understand how : economy works or someone who does but choose to mislead others. : if someone thinks that GS/MS or other banks/IB will earn abnormal profit, : t
|
p*f 发帖数: 77 | 27 40% of Americans don't pay taxes? Where was that number from?
by
market
suffer
they
not
【在 S****Y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : nobody says your earnings is because of non-profit. however much you are : earning right now is because that is your market value, mostly determined by : supply and demand. how many of you are there and how many of you the market : needs, in the long term, determined by the value of your work. : it is not the public who bail out the banks, it's the taxpayers, 40% of : americans don't pay tax and they bail out nothing. the taxpayers will suffer : more if they don't bail out because economy will suffer and ev
|
s******t 发帖数: 12883 | 28 他的record profit是基于fed救了aig,把烂资产买过去,让aig能给gs付钱,
如果aig破产,gs也要破产. 哪里来的record profit.
【在 a**********d 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : GS平时就比较特立独行,加上跟Washington的关系,在诸多IB里绝对算得上个异数,这 : 年景除了它没听说过还有谁是record profit。
|
k*****r 发帖数: 21039 | 29 米国劳动人民其实一点不傻,非常愤怒,不理智,但很多时候也能一针见血。
your
out
our
【在 d*******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : If you scroll back your mitbbs page, your web browser might still have your : original text. I'm curious how you reached your opinions. : I gather, all things happen for a reason, or reasons. It's messy and scary : so people got to find a way out. Cut the loss and move on. Let the devil : take : the hindermost. What shocked me the most is that how things were played out : and : how old fashion, raw social Darwinism dominates at the highest level of our : economy. : As for whose fault it was, I'm pretty sure there
|
k*****r 发帖数: 21039 | 30 i smell something real fishy here in your argument.
it's the only way to retain the top traders because they are smart and they
can earn as much in other banks, hfs, that is their market value. and by not
retaining them, the US banks will lose competitive edge and end up losing
more.
understood?
【在 S****Y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : yes, it is forced to save them, which is why the banks ain't supposed to : take those risks at the beginning. there were regulations to prevent them : from doing so, which failed squarely. : what do you feel about the government saving Ford, GM and Chrysler then? : the massive layoff and the recession ain't really the IB's fault. but that's : a longer story.
|
|
|
S****Y 发帖数: 4634 | 31 don't start believing every conspiracy theory out there.
【在 s******t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 他的record profit是基于fed救了aig,把烂资产买过去,让aig能给gs付钱, : 如果aig破产,gs也要破产. 哪里来的record profit.
|
S****Y 发帖数: 4634 | 32 state your argument then?
they
not
【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : i smell something real fishy here in your argument. : : it's the only way to retain the top traders because they are smart and they : can earn as much in other banks, hfs, that is their market value. and by not : retaining them, the US banks will lose competitive edge and end up losing : more. : understood?
|
k*****r 发帖数: 21039 | 33 arbeit macht frei.
【在 S****Y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : state your argument then? : : they : not
|
S****Y 发帖数: 4634 | 34 i knew you had no argument, just read bunch of conspiracy theory and naive
enough to believe them.
【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : arbeit macht frei.
|
k*****r 发帖数: 21039 | 35 we could equally label your stuff conspiracy.as i said, 屁股决定脑袋, you
can choose to believe what ever you want to believe. but the majority of
american people won't agree with your argument.
【在 S****Y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : i knew you had no argument, just read bunch of conspiracy theory and naive : enough to believe them.
|
d*******l 发帖数: 2567 | 36 My friend, your sentiment has points. But, no offense, I'd request that
we stay on factual,knowledgeable, and constructive discussions, rather
than racial, emotional and disrespectful.
I'm an engineering geek and have so far tried to stay away from
attempting to understand social issues. Then I found the money market
was so confusing and scary when it's time for myself to raise money
for my research and business.It's kind of rough to talk to any kind of
investors nowadays. Oh, my god, money is s
【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : we could equally label your stuff conspiracy.as i said, 屁股决定脑袋, you : can choose to believe what ever you want to believe. but the majority of : american people won't agree with your argument.
|
k*****r 发帖数: 21039 | 37 yeah, i fully agree.
for problems in science and engineering, we can always have arguments,
present facts and logic, then the truth will speak for itself.
but for religion and other psuedo science, there is no truth, just opinions.
that is why 阶级立场 will decide.
【在 d*******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : My friend, your sentiment has points. But, no offense, I'd request that : we stay on factual,knowledgeable, and constructive discussions, rather : than racial, emotional and disrespectful. : I'm an engineering geek and have so far tried to stay away from : attempting to understand social issues. Then I found the money market : was so confusing and scary when it's time for myself to raise money : for my research and business.It's kind of rough to talk to any kind of : investors nowadays. Oh, my god, money is s
|
d*******l 发帖数: 2567 | 38 politics, religion, races...well, those are open waters where sharks
dominate. I'd choose to duck my head.
Back to money and research. There is one thing good coming out of
this crisis which is a windfall of research funding available. From
dealing with those investors it's obvious that I don't have enough
knowledge or insight as for as how money market works. Anybody does
please contribute.
opinions.
【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : yeah, i fully agree. : for problems in science and engineering, we can always have arguments, : present facts and logic, then the truth will speak for itself. : but for religion and other psuedo science, there is no truth, just opinions. : that is why 阶级立场 will decide.
|
S****Y 发帖数: 4634 | 39 do you have any argument? or not?
【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : we could equally label your stuff conspiracy.as i said, 屁股决定脑袋, you : can choose to believe what ever you want to believe. but the majority of : american people won't agree with your argument.
|
S****Y 发帖数: 4634 | 40 ok, now i know where you are coming from. i can understand our disagreement
now.
opinions.
【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : yeah, i fully agree. : for problems in science and engineering, we can always have arguments, : present facts and logic, then the truth will speak for itself. : but for religion and other psuedo science, there is no truth, just opinions. : that is why 阶级立场 will decide.
|
|
|
k*****r 发帖数: 21039 | 41 yeah, i agree there are interesting technical problems in investment banking
, but i disagree that wall street way of resource allocation and investment,
is the most efficient and for the public interests.
disagreement
【在 S****Y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : ok, now i know where you are coming from. i can understand our disagreement : now. : : opinions.
|
S****Y 发帖数: 4634 | 42 it might not be, in some cases, it might be more efficient to directly
allocate capital, however, there is no simple way to guarantee that it will
be fair. which way do you think it's better?
banking
investment,
【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : yeah, i agree there are interesting technical problems in investment banking : , but i disagree that wall street way of resource allocation and investment, : is the most efficient and for the public interests. : : disagreement
|
k*****r 发帖数: 21039 | 43 duality. 2 solutions to the same problem in technical term.
but the way wall street operates, is definitely not for the public interests
.
will
【在 S****Y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : it might not be, in some cases, it might be more efficient to directly : allocate capital, however, there is no simple way to guarantee that it will : be fair. which way do you think it's better? : : banking : investment,
|