m*******4 发帖数: 55 | 1 投了一个IF 6左右的期刊,2个多月终于给了回复,
Reviewer #1: well organized and concisely presented. successfully applied
。。。. one typo in the captain of Figure 5. The manuscript is acceptable
for publication with minor revision.
Reviewer #2: clear and fluently explanatory of aims and results. the topic
is surely interesting and i'd say it's a "hot topic" in the field。。i say
that it's worth being published.
Reviewer #3: There is no doubt that the work was done carefully
Unfortunately, does not really advance our |
c8 发帖数: 282 | 2 review comments就这么一点点啊?我review的时候经常写三四页。
applied
acceptable
【在 m*******4 的大作中提到】 : 投了一个IF 6左右的期刊,2个多月终于给了回复, : Reviewer #1: well organized and concisely presented. successfully applied : 。。。. one typo in the captain of Figure 5. The manuscript is acceptable : for publication with minor revision. : Reviewer #2: clear and fluently explanatory of aims and results. the topic : is surely interesting and i'd say it's a "hot topic" in the field。。i say : that it's worth being published. : Reviewer #3: There is no doubt that the work was done carefully : Unfortunately, does not really advance our
|
b*****d 发帖数: 61690 | 3 他中间省略了很多。
【在 c8 的大作中提到】 : review comments就这么一点点啊?我review的时候经常写三四页。 : : applied : acceptable
|
m*******4 发帖数: 55 | 4 我摘取了主要观点,
我的这个comments是比较少,每人只有一段,一共不到一页 |
z*y 发帖数: 1311 | |
c******6 发帖数: 928 | 6 What is the opinion of the editor? |
m*******4 发帖数: 55 | 7 但是实质上就是直接据了,因为只能是minor revision才能再审
【在 z*y 的大作中提到】 : 最后那个算不上强烈反对吧
|
f*****t 发帖数: 901 | 8 可以写个rebuttal,argue一下。如果editor也对你的文章有好感,会让你resubmit的。
【在 m*******4 的大作中提到】 : 但是实质上就是直接据了,因为只能是minor revision才能再审
|
b*****d 发帖数: 61690 | 9 是不是让你resbumit,如果是,你照审稿人的意见改改,再被接受的可能性很高。
【在 m*******4 的大作中提到】 : 但是实质上就是直接据了,因为只能是minor revision才能再审
|
e******i 发帖数: 179 | 10
我以前投过一篇文章
第一次两个reviewer 都说不错,改改再投来
下次换了个editor,除了原来的两个reviewer 又整了俩新的
两新的reviewer拒了我
【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】 : 是不是让你resbumit,如果是,你照审稿人的意见改改,再被接受的可能性很高。
|
m*******4 发帖数: 55 | 11 好的,谢谢,
再投一次,希望不再被狙击。。。。
【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】 : 是不是让你resbumit,如果是,你照审稿人的意见改改,再被接受的可能性很高。
|
G**Y 发帖数: 33224 | 12 我咋觉得多还positive呀。
没啥强烈反对的。
applied
acceptable
【在 m*******4 的大作中提到】 : 投了一个IF 6左右的期刊,2个多月终于给了回复, : Reviewer #1: well organized and concisely presented. successfully applied : 。。。. one typo in the captain of Figure 5. The manuscript is acceptable : for publication with minor revision. : Reviewer #2: clear and fluently explanatory of aims and results. the topic : is surely interesting and i'd say it's a "hot topic" in the field。。i say : that it's worth being published. : Reviewer #3: There is no doubt that the work was done carefully : Unfortunately, does not really advance our
|