k*****r
发帖数: 21039 | 1 有没有公开的，free的，直接就给自动算个h-index的？ |
j******n
发帖数: 1727 | 2 web of sci
【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】
: 有没有公开的，free的，直接就给自动算个h-index的？
|
s********n
发帖数: 1865 | 3 scopus and ISI's researcher ID
scopus is better |
k*****r
发帖数: 21039 | 4 is it free ?
kind of confusing to me.
【在 s********n 的大作中提到】
: scopus and ISI's researcher ID
: scopus is better
|
w********h
发帖数: 12367 | 5 it is free. click "citation report" after gathering all your papers.
【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】
: is it free ?
: kind of confusing to me.
|
k*****r
发帖数: 21039 | 6 hmm, i was using the research id, it requires an RIS upload.
is there any open source ref editor that generate RIS ?
【在 w********h 的大作中提到】
: it is free. click "citation report" after gathering all your papers.
|
a**********e
发帖数: 67 | 7 Scopus is not good. Use Publish or Perish instead.
【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】
: hmm, i was using the research id, it requires an RIS upload.
: is there any open source ref editor that generate RIS ?
|
s********n
发帖数: 1865 | 8 scopus does not need you to input papers on by one. if your name is not that general, it can pull out all of your papers published. just do search on author name, then tick all your valid records, click "citation
tracker", on the right side of the page,there is your total citation of each paper (each year and overall citations since it appeared) and there is H-index at top-right corner for all your publication. |
s********n
发帖数: 1865 | 9 why is scopus not good?
【在 a**********e 的大作中提到】
: Scopus is not good. Use Publish or Perish instead.
|
c******a
发帖数: 633 | 10 both Web of Science and Scopus are not free. If your university has access
to these database you can get your h-index easily.
If you want a free one, you may try scHolar index
http://interaction.lille.inria.fr/~roussel/projects/scholarindex/index.cgi, which is based on Google Scholar.
or Microsoft Academic Search
http://academic.research.microsoft.com/
Please keep in mind that these free ones are not reliable as they are
generated by agents. |
|
|
k*****r
发帖数: 21039 | 11 thnx, PoP seems to be better.
but the output by PoP is not recognized by PoP itself,say if i save it as .
csv.
【在 a**********e 的大作中提到】
: Scopus is not good. Use Publish or Perish instead.
|
a**********e
发帖数: 67 | 12 Database not update to date.
【在 s********n 的大作中提到】
: why is scopus not good?
|
c******a
发帖数: 633 | 13 Scopus is fairly good comparing with WoS, which updates weekly.
PoP is also based on Google scholar, which is not reliable. |
d*****r
发帖数: 1635 | |
a**********e
发帖数: 67 | 15 Although you need to filter out some garbage in PoP, I can at least find
my papers there, but not in Scopus. Scopus may update weekly, but its
sources of information seem limited.
【在 c******a 的大作中提到】
: Scopus is fairly good comparing with WoS, which updates weekly.
: PoP is also based on Google scholar, which is not reliable.
|
c******a
发帖数: 633 | 16 Scopus 和Web of Science的文章收录都是有一定标准的，比如Web of Science就是国
内热炒的SCI，不是什么文章都能收录的。另外所有的引用都有人把关确保不出错，即
使错了您也有更正的机会。
Google Scholar则是凡是网上的它都收录，有良莠不齐之嫌。可有些不freely
available online的文章他就不收了。比如您老的某篇文章放在网上被某学生在某作业
里引用了切把它放在了网上，Google Scholar认为您的引用数增加1，可Science某篇文
章真正的引用了您的大作，由于Science的文章Google搜不到(假设啊），您就少了这么
重要的引用。
【在 a**********e 的大作中提到】
: Although you need to filter out some garbage in PoP, I can at least find
: my papers there, but not in Scopus. Scopus may update weekly, but its
: sources of information seem limited.
|
a**********e
发帖数: 67 | 17 You certainly have your points. For me, the problem of Scopus is SCI is
known to lack an in-depth coverage of conferences. CS, the field I'm in,
happens to value conferences. Your field may be different.
【在 c******a 的大作中提到】
: Scopus 和Web of Science的文章收录都是有一定标准的，比如Web of Science就是国
: 内热炒的SCI，不是什么文章都能收录的。另外所有的引用都有人把关确保不出错，即
: 使错了您也有更正的机会。
: Google Scholar则是凡是网上的它都收录，有良莠不齐之嫌。可有些不freely
: available online的文章他就不收了。比如您老的某篇文章放在网上被某学生在某作业
: 里引用了切把它放在了网上，Google Scholar认为您的引用数增加1，可Science某篇文
: 章真正的引用了您的大作，由于Science的文章Google搜不到(假设啊），您就少了这么
: 重要的引用。
|
c******a
发帖数: 633 | 18 Scopus 收的会议很多，WoS最近也加了会议，一般来说够用了，当然你的行当要是太偏
就不好办了
【在 a**********e 的大作中提到】
: You certainly have your points. For me, the problem of Scopus is SCI is
: known to lack an in-depth coverage of conferences. CS, the field I'm in,
: happens to value conferences. Your field may be different.
|
k*****r
发帖数: 21039 | 19 CS一般tenure的时候，h-indx/g-indx应该是多少？
【在 a**********e 的大作中提到】
: You certainly have your points. For me, the problem of Scopus is SCI is
: known to lack an in-depth coverage of conferences. CS, the field I'm in,
: happens to value conferences. Your field may be different.
|
c******a
发帖数: 633 | 20 估计没人敢订个标准，不过俺以为即使没10也应该有7，8。
【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】
: CS一般tenure的时候，h-indx/g-indx应该是多少？
|
a**********e
发帖数: 67 | 21 I'm afraid that it's too hard a problem to give an answer to.
【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】
: CS一般tenure的时候，h-indx/g-indx应该是多少？
|
k*****r
发帖数: 21039 | 22 yeah, you are prob right. different areas would be quite different.
【在 a**********e 的大作中提到】
: I'm afraid that it's too hard a problem to give an answer to.
|
