H******r
发帖数: 2879 | 1 我最近和博士导师一篇文章一个杂志，revision后的feedback很好，基本上就是可以接
受了，但是还有一些修改。
我做了修改，然后写了response letter，给导师看，他说我slight overdid the
appreciation of the referees，是说我感谢过头了？ 我打算把significantly
improved改成greatly improved，大家看咋样？ |
v*******y
发帖数: 5530 | 2 你这么泛泛地说
谁能给你意见。。。
【在 H******r 的大作中提到】
: 我最近和博士导师一篇文章一个杂志，revision后的feedback很好，基本上就是可以接
: 受了，但是还有一些修改。
: 我做了修改，然后写了response letter，给导师看，他说我slight overdid the
: appreciation of the referees，是说我感谢过头了？ 我打算把significantly
: improved改成greatly improved，大家看咋样？
|
h*****n
发帖数: 924 | 3 god, who cares, referees will not change the decision just b/c of this. do w
hatever u want, as long as you do not say "significantly worsened"
【在 H******r 的大作中提到】
: 我最近和博士导师一篇文章一个杂志，revision后的feedback很好，基本上就是可以接
: 受了，但是还有一些修改。
: 我做了修改，然后写了response letter，给导师看，他说我slight overdid the
: appreciation of the referees，是说我感谢过头了？ 我打算把significantly
: improved改成greatly improved，大家看咋样？
|
a**********d
发帖数: 2293 | 4 Both significantly and greatly are strong words. The difference between them
, in this context, is neither significant nor great.
Your advisor was being diplomatic. The fact that he made this remark means
you overdid the appreciation pretty significantly, or greatly. Had you
indeed overdone it slightly, he would not have said anything.
I would also suggest that you do not claim the paper was improved either
significantly or greatly. It is a bit self-flattering. Some of the referees
might consider the improvement sufficient but not significant, or great. |
w******t
发帖数: 1422 | 5 Just say we carefully revise the paper following the suggestions of
reviewers.
Sometime, the boss know who reviewed the paper and does not want to over
appreciate the review comments. |
H******r
发帖数: 2879 | |
c*****i
发帖数: 86 | 7 Haha. Good one.
w
【在 h*****n 的大作中提到】
: god, who cares, referees will not change the decision just b/c of this. do w
: hatever u want, as long as you do not say "significantly worsened"
|
m****m
发帖数: 229 | 8 说their constructive comments and suggestions help to improve
the paper就足够了。 |
