L***s 发帖数: 9258 | 1 To summarize, the original contribution of this work is still questionable a
nd has major flaws. The authors should be honest and should not ignore the p
rior art in which lots of techniques are generic and applicable to many tech
nologies.
老子气坏了,写了封email回给editor:
We feel very disappointed and strongly disagree the criticism raised by revi
ewer on our academic ethics. We believe we have already given a fair judgeme
nt on the difference between our work and all prior-art works at the maximum
extension of our knowledge. We feel that the criticism and the used word ar
e very subjective, biased, unscientific, and rude. In such a case, we questi
on the reviewer's technical capability and the review's objectivity. We requ
est the editors to consider the possibility to find other capable reviewers
for our submission. |
n******v 发帖数: 2184 | 2 写的好。该说就的说。
a
p
tech
revi
judgeme
maximum
ar
questi
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : To summarize, the original contribution of this work is still questionable a : nd has major flaws. The authors should be honest and should not ignore the p : rior art in which lots of techniques are generic and applicable to many tech : nologies. : 老子气坏了,写了封email回给editor: : We feel very disappointed and strongly disagree the criticism raised by revi : ewer on our academic ethics. We believe we have already given a fair judgeme : nt on the difference between our work and all prior-art works at the maximum : extension of our knowledge. We feel that the criticism and the used word ar : e very subjective, biased, unscientific, and rude. In such a case, we questi
|
m****m 发帖数: 2211 | 3 支持
【在 n******v 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 写的好。该说就的说。 : : a : p : tech : revi : judgeme : maximum : ar : questi
|
m****m 发帖数: 2211 | 4 如果光看这段,你的回复正常
问题是summarize之前的有没有举出一些work你们没有很好的cite呢
a
p
tech
revi
judgeme
maximum
ar
questi
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : To summarize, the original contribution of this work is still questionable a : nd has major flaws. The authors should be honest and should not ignore the p : rior art in which lots of techniques are generic and applicable to many tech : nologies. : 老子气坏了,写了封email回给editor: : We feel very disappointed and strongly disagree the criticism raised by revi : ewer on our academic ethics. We believe we have already given a fair judgeme : nt on the difference between our work and all prior-art works at the maximum : extension of our knowledge. We feel that the criticism and the used word ar : e very subjective, biased, unscientific, and rude. In such a case, we questi
|
w*******n 发帖数: 408 | 5 Publication is sometimes a political game, not a scientific game. |
j***o 发帖数: 5096 | |
p**m 发帖数: 11571 | 7 lol
【在 j***o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : LOL,写完之后心情好了点,然后小心翼翼的删掉
|
e****g 发帖数: 4434 | 8 靠,不是咱俩的collaborative proposal吧,
a
p
tech
revi
judgeme
maximum
ar
questi
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : To summarize, the original contribution of this work is still questionable a : nd has major flaws. The authors should be honest and should not ignore the p : rior art in which lots of techniques are generic and applicable to many tech : nologies. : 老子气坏了,写了封email回给editor: : We feel very disappointed and strongly disagree the criticism raised by revi : ewer on our academic ethics. We believe we have already given a fair judgeme : nt on the difference between our work and all prior-art works at the maximum : extension of our knowledge. We feel that the criticism and the used word ar : e very subjective, biased, unscientific, and rude. In such a case, we questi
|
p**m 发帖数: 11571 | 9 paper吧
【在 e****g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 靠,不是咱俩的collaborative proposal吧, : : a : p : tech : revi : judgeme : maximum : ar : questi
|
L***s 发帖数: 9258 | 10 我已经cite了。而且还给出了reference的适用范围和我们使用的差别。这家伙还不依不
饶的。
【在 m****m 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 如果光看这段,你的回复正常 : 问题是summarize之前的有没有举出一些work你们没有很好的cite呢 : : a : p : tech : revi : judgeme : maximum : ar
|
|
|
L***s 发帖数: 9258 | 11 直接打电话给editor complain了。你妈的。老子不发了。
【在 j***o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : LOL,写完之后心情好了点,然后小心翼翼的删掉
|
j***o 发帖数: 5096 | 12 哈哈哈。。。也就是说你真的把信删了
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 直接打电话给editor complain了。你妈的。老子不发了。
|
j***w 发帖数: 5379 | 13 lol
【在 j***o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : LOL,写完之后心情好了点,然后小心翼翼的删掉
|
r*****l 发帖数: 354 | 14 激动的时候写的东西,容易有typo。:)
比如:
disagree 【with】the criticism by [the] reviewer |
w********h 发帖数: 12367 | 15 牛。
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 直接打电话给editor complain了。你妈的。老子不发了。
|
w*****n 发帖数: 2693 | 16 hehe
其实blind review和网上发帖有点像
人隐身的时候通常都比面对面的时候mean一些,悲愤一些,犬儒一些
收到review,可以放两天再看,当场看基本都有骂人的冲动
a
p
tech
revi
judgeme
maximum
ar
questi
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : To summarize, the original contribution of this work is still questionable a : nd has major flaws. The authors should be honest and should not ignore the p : rior art in which lots of techniques are generic and applicable to many tech : nologies. : 老子气坏了,写了封email回给editor: : We feel very disappointed and strongly disagree the criticism raised by revi : ewer on our academic ethics. We believe we have already given a fair judgeme : nt on the difference between our work and all prior-art works at the maximum : extension of our knowledge. We feel that the criticism and the used word ar : e very subjective, biased, unscientific, and rude. In such a case, we questi
|
L***s 发帖数: 9258 | 17 不收就不收么,没必要扯什么honest不honest。
【在 w*****n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : hehe : 其实blind review和网上发帖有点像 : 人隐身的时候通常都比面对面的时候mean一些,悲愤一些,犬儒一些 : 收到review,可以放两天再看,当场看基本都有骂人的冲动 : : a : p : tech : revi : judgeme
|
b*****d 发帖数: 61690 | 18 这种搞人身攻击的意见,应该骂回去。
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 不收就不收么,没必要扯什么honest不honest。
|