L***s
发帖数: 9258 | 1 To summarize, the original contribution of this work is still questionable a
nd has major flaws. The authors should be honest and should not ignore the p
rior art in which lots of techniques are generic and applicable to many tech
nologies.
老子气坏了，写了封email回给editor:
We feel very disappointed and strongly disagree the criticism raised by revi
ewer on our academic ethics. We believe we have already given a fair judgeme
nt on the difference between our work and all prior-art works at the maximum
extension of our knowledge. We feel that the criticism and the used word ar
e very subjective, biased, unscientific, and rude. In such a case, we questi
on the reviewer's technical capability and the review's objectivity. We requ
est the editors to consider the possibility to find other capable reviewers
for our submission. |
n******v
发帖数: 2184 | 2 写的好。该说就的说。
a
p
tech
revi
judgeme
maximum
ar
questi
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】
: To summarize, the original contribution of this work is still questionable a
: nd has major flaws. The authors should be honest and should not ignore the p
: rior art in which lots of techniques are generic and applicable to many tech
: nologies.
: 老子气坏了，写了封email回给editor:
: We feel very disappointed and strongly disagree the criticism raised by revi
: ewer on our academic ethics. We believe we have already given a fair judgeme
: nt on the difference between our work and all prior-art works at the maximum
: extension of our knowledge. We feel that the criticism and the used word ar
: e very subjective, biased, unscientific, and rude. In such a case, we questi
|
m****m
发帖数: 2211 | 3 支持
【在 n******v 的大作中提到】
: 写的好。该说就的说。
:
: a
: p
: tech
: revi
: judgeme
: maximum
: ar
: questi
|
m****m
发帖数: 2211 | 4 如果光看这段，你的回复正常
问题是summarize之前的有没有举出一些work你们没有很好的cite呢
a
p
tech
revi
judgeme
maximum
ar
questi
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】
: To summarize, the original contribution of this work is still questionable a
: nd has major flaws. The authors should be honest and should not ignore the p
: rior art in which lots of techniques are generic and applicable to many tech
: nologies.
: 老子气坏了，写了封email回给editor:
: We feel very disappointed and strongly disagree the criticism raised by revi
: ewer on our academic ethics. We believe we have already given a fair judgeme
: nt on the difference between our work and all prior-art works at the maximum
: extension of our knowledge. We feel that the criticism and the used word ar
: e very subjective, biased, unscientific, and rude. In such a case, we questi
|
w*******n
发帖数: 408 | 5 Publication is sometimes a political game, not a scientific game. |
j***o
发帖数: 5096 | |
p**m
发帖数: 11571 | 7 lol
【在 j***o 的大作中提到】
: LOL，写完之后心情好了点，然后小心翼翼的删掉
|
e****g
发帖数: 4434 | 8 靠，不是咱俩的collaborative proposal吧，
a
p
tech
revi
judgeme
maximum
ar
questi
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】
: To summarize, the original contribution of this work is still questionable a
: nd has major flaws. The authors should be honest and should not ignore the p
: rior art in which lots of techniques are generic and applicable to many tech
: nologies.
: 老子气坏了，写了封email回给editor:
: We feel very disappointed and strongly disagree the criticism raised by revi
: ewer on our academic ethics. We believe we have already given a fair judgeme
: nt on the difference between our work and all prior-art works at the maximum
: extension of our knowledge. We feel that the criticism and the used word ar
: e very subjective, biased, unscientific, and rude. In such a case, we questi
|
p**m
发帖数: 11571 | 9 paper吧
【在 e****g 的大作中提到】
: 靠，不是咱俩的collaborative proposal吧，
:
: a
: p
: tech
: revi
: judgeme
: maximum
: ar
: questi
|
L***s
发帖数: 9258 | 10 我已经cite了。而且还给出了reference的适用范围和我们使用的差别。这家伙还不依不
饶的。
【在 m****m 的大作中提到】
: 如果光看这段，你的回复正常
: 问题是summarize之前的有没有举出一些work你们没有很好的cite呢
:
: a
: p
: tech
: revi
: judgeme
: maximum
: ar
|
|
|
L***s
发帖数: 9258 | 11 直接打电话给editor complain了。你妈的。老子不发了。
【在 j***o 的大作中提到】
: LOL，写完之后心情好了点，然后小心翼翼的删掉
|
j***o
发帖数: 5096 | 12 哈哈哈。。。也就是说你真的把信删了
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】
: 直接打电话给editor complain了。你妈的。老子不发了。
|
j***w
发帖数: 5379 | 13 lol
【在 j***o 的大作中提到】
: LOL，写完之后心情好了点，然后小心翼翼的删掉
|
r*****l
发帖数: 354 | 14 激动的时候写的东西，容易有typo。：）
比如：
disagree 【with】the criticism by [the] reviewer |
w********h
发帖数: 12367 | 15 牛。
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】
: 直接打电话给editor complain了。你妈的。老子不发了。
|
w*****n
发帖数: 2693 | 16 hehe
其实blind review和网上发帖有点像
人隐身的时候通常都比面对面的时候mean一些，悲愤一些，犬儒一些
收到review，可以放两天再看，当场看基本都有骂人的冲动
a
p
tech
revi
judgeme
maximum
ar
questi
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】
: To summarize, the original contribution of this work is still questionable a
: nd has major flaws. The authors should be honest and should not ignore the p
: rior art in which lots of techniques are generic and applicable to many tech
: nologies.
: 老子气坏了，写了封email回给editor:
: We feel very disappointed and strongly disagree the criticism raised by revi
: ewer on our academic ethics. We believe we have already given a fair judgeme
: nt on the difference between our work and all prior-art works at the maximum
: extension of our knowledge. We feel that the criticism and the used word ar
: e very subjective, biased, unscientific, and rude. In such a case, we questi
|
L***s
发帖数: 9258 | 17 不收就不收么，没必要扯什么honest不honest。
【在 w*****n 的大作中提到】
: hehe
: 其实blind review和网上发帖有点像
: 人隐身的时候通常都比面对面的时候mean一些，悲愤一些，犬儒一些
: 收到review，可以放两天再看，当场看基本都有骂人的冲动
:
: a
: p
: tech
: revi
: judgeme
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 18 这种搞人身攻击的意见，应该骂回去。
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】
: 不收就不收么，没必要扯什么honest不honest。
|
