由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Faculty版 - Asian got lowest acceptance rate in NSF funding?
相关主题
Asian got LOWEST success rate in' NSF proposals大家评审proposal怎么看待PIs 的current&pending
NSF ProposalNSF proposal submitted in last Nov (EECS)
八月初的 NSF proposal紧急请教NSF proposal
NSF不淡定了NSF review方式又出新妖蛾子
NSF panel meeting人在公司了NSF proposal批了还有影响吗?
NSF proposal又被锯掉一个,郁闷!NSF来信
How many grants do you apply per year?关于proposal 请教版上各位前辈
请教各位拿过NSF funding的牛人们AFOSR proposal
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: nsf话题: pis话题: why话题: rate话题: asian
进入Faculty版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
i****l
发帖数: 287
1
Just received this from 80-20, true?
3) Why do AsAm PIs have the lowest success rate in NSF proposals funding
rate, although they may have the higher perhaps even the highest average
publication rate?
NSF just released the following report (See middle of p. 2): The
success rate for proposals from PIs was White 24%; from Hispanics or Latin
PIs was 20%; from Black/African-Am. PIs was 18%; from Asian PIs was 17%. We
are always the last!
Why? Why? Why? Because the House, Senate and White House Committees of
science that are supposed to monitor NSF, didn't find such a statistical
result abnormal. In other words: SANCTIONED BY
GOVERNMENT!
If one of the committee chairs would ask a question such as that posed
in 3) and request a special report on these success rates next year, if the
same pattern holds, chances are NSF will begin doing internal adjustments to
be more fair to AsAm PIs right away. 80-20 EF, which is always extremely
busy, may work towards that goal, if we can find time, and if many of you
will write in to request it.
n******g
发帖数: 2201
2
因为男亚裔太多 拉低了命中率 解决办法只招女亚裔
[在 ilmpnl (pure) 的大作中提到:]
:Just received this from 80-20, true?
:rate, although they may have the higher perhaps even the highest average
:publication rate?
We are always the last!
of science that are supposed to monitor NSF, didn't find such a
statistical
T*********s
发帖数: 20444
3
因为烂校的老中教授太多啦
g******t
发帖数: 11249
4
而且应该是鸟不拉屎的地方的
只能挤NSF
周边没有办法横向合作

【在 T*********s 的大作中提到】
: 因为烂校的老中教授太多啦
d*******h
发帖数: 2146
5
可以理解吧
80-90%都是亚裔投的
然后华人和印度人胡搞胡混的比例又挺高
美国佬写的有水平很差的但态度上胡写的比例比较低
比较掉眼镜的是咱华人有很多大牛就随便拼凑点投来了

We

【在 i****l 的大作中提到】
: Just received this from 80-20, true?
: 3) Why do AsAm PIs have the lowest success rate in NSF proposals funding
: rate, although they may have the higher perhaps even the highest average
: publication rate?
: NSF just released the following report (See middle of p. 2): The
: success rate for proposals from PIs was White 24%; from Hispanics or Latin
: PIs was 20%; from Black/African-Am. PIs was 18%; from Asian PIs was 17%. We
: are always the last!
: Why? Why? Why? Because the House, Senate and White House Committees of
: science that are supposed to monitor NSF, didn't find such a statistical

1 (共1页)
进入Faculty版参与讨论
相关主题
AFOSR proposalNSF panel meeting
能否把大致相同的proposal同时递交到NSF和NIH?NSF proposal又被锯掉一个,郁闷!
请大牛答疑,关于NSF proposalHow many grants do you apply per year?
问一个写proposal时候的人称问题请教各位拿过NSF funding的牛人们
Asian got LOWEST success rate in' NSF proposals大家评审proposal怎么看待PIs 的current&pending
NSF ProposalNSF proposal submitted in last Nov (EECS)
八月初的 NSF proposal紧急请教NSF proposal
NSF不淡定了NSF review方式又出新妖蛾子
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: nsf话题: pis话题: why话题: rate话题: asian