R*3 发帖数: 11814 | 1 http://www.northjersey.com/eastrutherford/Super_Bowl_ticket_mar
“It’s simple economics that when you see [Monday] morning there are 1,900
seats on the market, and [late Monday afternoon] there are over 4,500, that
should drive the price down immediately,” Patania said. “So something’s
wrong with this market.”
TiqIQ.com spokesman Chris Matcovich — whose company tracks such secondary
ticket markets as Stubhub, which generally parallels prices being offered by
brokers — agreed that the lack of a “bump” in the first 24 hours after
the conference title games was surprising.
“After looking over the numbers for this year from previous years, I think
$1,500 will be a reasonable buy point in Week 2, unless demand from Broncos
and Seahawks fans picks up,” Matcovich said of prices for upper-level seats.
That would be roughly on par with each of the more recent Super Bowls, said
SeatGeek spokes¬man Connor Gregoire, who agrees that the ticket-cost
trend is likely to fall by next week. The average ticket sale price for last
year’s San Francisco versus Baltimore game in New Orleans, Gregoire notes,
slid from a peak of $3,445 just after the conference championships, to just
$1,551 per ticket on the day of the game.
The advice, then, for North Jerseyans (EDIT) and Seahawk/Bronco fans who are
tempted to buy a ticket is to be patient. | R*3 发帖数: 11814 | 2 相熟V5!
900
that
by
think
【在 R*3 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : http://www.northjersey.com/eastrutherford/Super_Bowl_ticket_mar : “It’s simple economics that when you see [Monday] morning there are 1,900 : seats on the market, and [late Monday afternoon] there are over 4,500, that : should drive the price down immediately,” Patania said. “So something’s : wrong with this market.” : TiqIQ.com spokesman Chris Matcovich — whose company tracks such secondary : ticket markets as Stubhub, which generally parallels prices being offered by : brokers — agreed that the lack of a “bump” in the first 24 hours after : the conference title games was surprising. : “After looking over the numbers for this year from previous years, I think
|
|