m***g
发帖数: 171 | 1 自己DIY的EB1A, claim老三项， paper 20篇，citation 100（independent 50）
review 40，recommendation letter 7 (5 independent), pp之后的来了RFE, 质疑
contribution一项， 请大家帮我分析一下应该如何准备：
Evidence of your original scientific, scholarly contributions of major
significance in the field.
a. The petitioner asserts that he has made numerous original scientific
contributions of major significance in the field of XXX; he has published
his work, his work has been cited independently a small number of times; he
has served as a reviewer for several journals; and presented his work at
conferences.
b. This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted doesn’t
show that your contributions are considered to be of major significance in
the field of endeavor. The USCIS only confirm a small number of independent
citations to your published work. Self-citations and citations made by your
research group are not considered.
c. The service acknowledges receipt of your publication and citation record.
Now please submit updated documentation of the citation record regarding
your publications including printouts of search results from Google Scholar.
Please note that such printout must contain the title, authors, and
publication information. Search results do not contain such details will not
be considered evidence.
我有几个疑问：
1. USCIS在上面没有提到我的推荐信？一般RFE还要几封？
2. 我的citation比较弱，特别是independent的， 该如何应对？
3. 最后一段，是要update最新的citation吧？这个不是在说我递交的材料格式不对
吧？现在citation估计只会多几个而已。 | g*********r
发帖数: 113 | 2 为啥你要把自引和他引分出来呢？
我只是把google scholar的结果打印出来。 一个总的summary的结果， 然后每篇文章
被引用的结果。
然后，在PL里就说，totally cited ** times. 然后列出别人引用的journal title，
paper title.
是不是多补充一下其他能证明contribution的材料？
he
【在 m***g 的大作中提到】
: 自己DIY的EB1A, claim老三项， paper 20篇，citation 100（independent 50）
: review 40，recommendation letter 7 (5 independent), pp之后的来了RFE, 质疑
: contribution一项， 请大家帮我分析一下应该如何准备：
: Evidence of your original scientific, scholarly contributions of major
: significance in the field.
: a. The petitioner asserts that he has made numerous original scientific
: contributions of major significance in the field of XXX; he has published
: his work, his work has been cited independently a small number of times; he
: has served as a reviewer for several journals; and presented his work at
: conferences.
| m***g
发帖数: 171 | 3 自己DIY的EB1A, claim老三项， paper 20篇，citation 100（independent 50）
review 40，recommendation letter 7 (5 independent), pp之后的来了RFE, 质疑
contribution一项， 请大家帮我分析一下应该如何准备：
Evidence of your original scientific, scholarly contributions of major
significance in the field.
a. The petitioner asserts that he has made numerous original scientific
contributions of major significance in the field of XXX; he has published
his work, his work has been cited independently a small number of times; he
has served as a reviewer for several journals; and presented his work at
conferences.
b. This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted doesn’t
show that your contributions are considered to be of major significance in
the field of endeavor. The USCIS only confirm a small number of independent
citations to your published work. Self-citations and citations made by your
research group are not considered.
c. The service acknowledges receipt of your publication and citation record.
Now please submit updated documentation of the citation record regarding
your publications including printouts of search results from Google Scholar.
Please note that such printout must contain the title, authors, and
publication information. Search results do not contain such details will not
be considered evidence.
我有几个疑问：
1. USCIS在上面没有提到我的推荐信？一般RFE还要几封？
2. 我的citation比较弱，特别是independent的， 该如何应对？
3. 最后一段，是要update最新的citation吧？这个不是在说我递交的材料格式不对
吧？现在citation估计只会多几个而已。 | g*********r
发帖数: 113 | 4 为啥你要把自引和他引分出来呢？
我只是把google scholar的结果打印出来。 一个总的summary的结果， 然后每篇文章
被引用的结果。
然后，在PL里就说，totally cited ** times. 然后列出别人引用的journal title，
paper title.
是不是多补充一下其他能证明contribution的材料？
he
【在 m***g 的大作中提到】
: 自己DIY的EB1A, claim老三项， paper 20篇，citation 100（independent 50）
: review 40，recommendation letter 7 (5 independent), pp之后的来了RFE, 质疑
: contribution一项， 请大家帮我分析一下应该如何准备：
: Evidence of your original scientific, scholarly contributions of major
: significance in the field.
: a. The petitioner asserts that he has made numerous original scientific
: contributions of major significance in the field of XXX; he has published
: his work, his work has been cited independently a small number of times; he
: has served as a reviewer for several journals; and presented his work at
: conferences.
| M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | 5 要你提交updated的citation，那就提交吧。我估计你的contribution, 没有深挖，让
IO只评价你的文章 引用数量之类的。要挖掘其他的地方，比如 牛人引用你，被邀请做
报告，方法被数据库收录，媒体报道等。让这些东西来掩盖你引用低的问题。 | M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | 6 要你提交updated的citation，那就提交吧。我估计你的contribution, 没有深挖，让
IO只评价你的文章 引用数量之类的。要挖掘其他的地方，比如 牛人引用你，被邀请做
报告，方法被数据库收录，媒体报道等。让这些东西来掩盖你引用低的问题。 | s**********9
发帖数: 99 | 7 我也赞成gaborfilter。 我的律师也是说不要分开。问了国际学生处的人，也都说不因
该分开。我在这里考古了半年也没分晓。 |
|
