m****o
发帖数: 310 | 1 对于引用其实就三个主要的source： web of science, scholar, and scopus。可是每
个source收录文章的引用数目是不一样的。我每个source都列出了>50的引用，但是并
集有>70。
我想问如何在申请过程中充分利用并集的数目，需如何做诠释，还是只能列出一个
source的收录数目。 |
c******g
发帖数: 9273 | 2 我觉得选最多的一个就行了
【在 m****o 的大作中提到】
: 对于引用其实就三个主要的source： web of science, scholar, and scopus。可是每
: 个source收录文章的引用数目是不一样的。我每个source都列出了>50的引用，但是并
: 集有>70。
: 我想问如何在申请过程中充分利用并集的数目，需如何做诠释，还是只能列出一个
: source的收录数目。
|
a***n
发帖数: 3951 | 3 你可以将三个多列出作为佐证，然后给出最大的引用数 |
m****o
发帖数: 310 | 4 问题就是三个source给出的citation都是>50 |
a***n
发帖数: 3951 | 5 所以你要将三个source分别给出citation，然后给出total citations |
I********6
发帖数: 53 | 6 I think you can give the union of all the sources. Some sources missed your
citations, but that is their fault. |
c******g
发帖数: 9273 | 7 it is not their fault
maybe that journal/book/article is not covered by their database.
your
【在 I********6 的大作中提到】
: I think you can give the union of all the sources. Some sources missed your
: citations, but that is their fault.
|
p*******h
发帖数: 1542 | 8 you can make a table to show the citation numbers from different resources.
And make a claim (Laoda555 showed a good example).\
"The reasons for the difference in the number of results retrieved from
Scopus only and the total number retrieved from Google Scholar, Scopus, ISI
Web of Science and Chinese paper searcher (CNKI)( China National Knowledge
Infrastructure) combination are:
I. Difference database sources.
II. ISI Web of Science, and Scopus focus on the most prestigious, high-
impact research journals, whereas Google Scholar broadly searches for
scholarly literature.
III: Chinese paper searcher (CNKI) only includes the information of Chinese
paper."
Good luck,. |
