L*****p
发帖数: 272 | 1 上次收到第一封推荐信，问过问题。
等了3个多星期，终于盼星星盼月亮来了第二封，独立牛教授人挺nice的，答应写了
可是大量删改了我吹牛的～～～～～～～把original, extraordinary 删的7788了。T
T 。只列举了客观事实。
前面倒是也提到说made some extremely valuable discoveries。但是也说了 as a
research scientist with extraordinary potential
在最后一段， 又写到：
XX is a young investigator who has made significant contributions to
biomedical science and who is on a trajectory to develop into a scientist of
international renown (这意思不是我还没有成为国际认可的吗?). As such, she
has the potential to become an important asset to the USA (又提到了potential
）. I can only comment on her scientific contributions, others will have to
attest to her good character, but my sense is that she will continue to be a
valuable scientific contributor. （真严谨阿，毕竟不认识，这能行吗？）
按eb1a 标准，请问这封信还能用吗？ 多谢多谢 | f******t
发帖数: 478 | |
|
