h********6
发帖数: 135 | 1 今天I-140 filed, 在版上潜水很久，受益非浅。上来求个bless.
先分享个背景
top20 计算生物薄后
Paper>10, first author>4
citation>1000, 大部分来自打酱油的文章。第一和第二作者citation>90
review>20, 5个journal, 一个conference
等approved了, 也会和大家分享一下timeline和申请经验。
直接上的PP, NSC | w******n
发帖数: 13202 | | s3
发帖数: 2270 | 3 bless
背景很强了，citation那么高
【在 h********6 的大作中提到】
: 今天I-140 filed, 在版上潜水很久，受益非浅。上来求个bless.
: 先分享个背景
: top20 计算生物薄后
: Paper>10, first author>4
: citation>1000, 大部分来自打酱油的文章。第一和第二作者citation>90
: review>20, 5个journal, 一个conference
: 等approved了, 也会和大家分享一下timeline和申请经验。
: 直接上的PP, NSC
| r****c
发帖数: 1029 | | n********l
发帖数: 259 | | p*******o
发帖数: 2726 | 6 bless!
【在 h********6 的大作中提到】
: 今天I-140 filed, 在版上潜水很久，受益非浅。上来求个bless.
: 先分享个背景
: top20 计算生物薄后
: Paper>10, first author>4
: citation>1000, 大部分来自打酱油的文章。第一和第二作者citation>90
: review>20, 5个journal, 一个conference
: 等approved了, 也会和大家分享一下timeline和申请经验。
: 直接上的PP, NSC
| c*****z
发帖数: 3090 | 7 big bless
【在 h********6 的大作中提到】
: 今天I-140 filed, 在版上潜水很久，受益非浅。上来求个bless.
: 先分享个背景
: top20 计算生物薄后
: Paper>10, first author>4
: citation>1000, 大部分来自打酱油的文章。第一和第二作者citation>90
: review>20, 5个journal, 一个conference
: 等approved了, 也会和大家分享一下timeline和申请经验。
: 直接上的PP, NSC
| U******5
发帖数: 645 | | p****n
发帖数: 1263 | 9 bless 牛背景
【在 h********6 的大作中提到】
: 今天I-140 filed, 在版上潜水很久，受益非浅。上来求个bless.
: 先分享个背景
: top20 计算生物薄后
: Paper>10, first author>4
: citation>1000, 大部分来自打酱油的文章。第一和第二作者citation>90
: review>20, 5个journal, 一个conference
: 等approved了, 也会和大家分享一下timeline和申请经验。
: 直接上的PP, NSC
| R*******d
发帖数: 13640 | | | | L******Y
发帖数: 10 | | L******Y
发帖数: 10 | | U******5
发帖数: 645 | | y****o
发帖数: 646 | 14 bless!!
【在 h********6 的大作中提到】
: 今天I-140 filed, 在版上潜水很久，受益非浅。上来求个bless.
: 先分享个背景
: top20 计算生物薄后
: Paper>10, first author>4
: citation>1000, 大部分来自打酱油的文章。第一和第二作者citation>90
: review>20, 5个journal, 一个conference
: 等approved了, 也会和大家分享一下timeline和申请经验。
: 直接上的PP, NSC
| Z******a
发帖数: 1104 | | s******g
发帖数: 780 | | t*********r
发帖数: 4143 | | A***e
发帖数: 186 | 18 Bless 速过。问个问题，总的citation 很高，自己一作的citation 没有很高，这个问
题要避免被看
出来吗？还是不重要？ | h********6
发帖数: 135 | 19 谢谢你的祝福。你问的问题确实也是我担心的，但是理论上不是一作的citation都算。
看过很多考古帖也都是这么说的。我找了project的PI帮我开了contribution的证明,
不知道是不是管用。
【在 A***e 的大作中提到】
: Bless 速过。问个问题，总的citation 很高，自己一作的citation 没有很高，这个问
: 题要避免被看
: 出来吗？还是不重要？
| z*******g
发帖数: 5721 | | | | A***e
发帖数: 186 | 21 我有一样的问题，所以想看看你是怎么处理的。
【在 h********6 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢你的祝福。你问的问题确实也是我担心的，但是理论上不是一作的citation都算。
: 看过很多考古帖也都是这么说的。我找了project的PI帮我开了contribution的证明,
: 不知道是不是管用。
| s****n
发帖数: 1262 | | r****c
发帖数: 1029 | | e*******n
发帖数: 872 | | x*******u
发帖数: 1028 | | a**r
发帖数: 352 | | d*******u
发帖数: 5337 | 27 The petitioner/beneficiary must establish that the national interest would
not be served if the petitioner/beneficiary was required to obtain a labor
certificate for the proposed employment. Documentation submitted by the
petitioner/beneficiary include:
Several letters of support/recommendation
Publications in which the petitioner/beneficiary authored or co-authored
Educational degree documents
Manu of the support/recommendation letters are from individuals who know the
petitioner/beneficiary and have knowledge of her work. Additionally, the
letters are general in nature and describe duties that are inherent to the
field. The letters do not demonstrate that the beneficiary’s past work has
resulted in findings of major significance or that the beneficiary is more
skilled than others who perform the same work or similar work. Please submit
evidence to establish that the beneficiary’s past record justifies
projections of future benefit to the nation.
The petitioner must persuasively demonstrate that the national interest
would be adversely affected if a labor certification were required. The
petitioner must demonstrate that it would be contrary to the national
interest to potentially deprive the prospective employer of the beneficiary
’s services by making the position available to U.S. workers.
The petitioner must establish that the beneficiary has a past record of
specific prior achievement with some degree of influence on the field as a
whole. The beneficiary’s previous influence on the field as a whole must
justify projections of future benefit to the national interest. The
petitioner must establish, in some capacity, the beneficiary’s ability to
serve the national interest to a substantially greater extent than the
majority of others in the field. For example, the petitioner may submit
copies of the beneficiary’s patents and copyrights; grant proposals; peer
reviewed articles; performance evaluations for the last five to ten years;
work that has been evaluated in independent journals; and awards for work in
the field. Any awards for work in the field of awards given, the frequency
of the award, the criteria for granting the award, and the number of
individuals eligible to compete for the award.
The petitioner must establish that the beneficiary’s skills or background
are unique and innovative and serve the national interest. If the
beneficiary possesses any special skills, knowledge or abilities that could
not be articulated on an application for labor certification, the petitioner
must submit evidence to demonstrate these special skills, knowledge or
abilities.
Also, please submit Form ETA-750B, “statement of qualifications of alien,”
or form ETA-9089, “application for permanent employment certification,”
parts J, K and L. | t*******g
发帖数: 1301 | 28 blessing
【在 h********6 的大作中提到】
: 今天I-140 filed, 在版上潜水很久，受益非浅。上来求个bless.
: 先分享个背景
: top20 计算生物薄后
: Paper>10, first author>4
: citation>1000, 大部分来自打酱油的文章。第一和第二作者citation>90
: review>20, 5个journal, 一个conference
: 等approved了, 也会和大家分享一下timeline和申请经验。
: 直接上的PP, NSC
| z*********0
发帖数: 912 | |
|
