由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Immigration版 - 提供几个对eb4 sij的公开评论的idea
相关主题
现在还没386的消息 看来风头被弹劾盖过去了S386的问题是其极端性,相当于阶级专政
既然移民改革无望 给大家提几个也许可行的脑洞吧最好的方案是留80%以上的名额给美国毕业的留学生
如果我对IV语焉不详的twitter理解正确的话我们能否游说USCIS给I-140批准且在美国境内的申请者EAD
请教一个问题 关于485pending大家注意reference letter里面不要有重复
求助: EB1这个条件怎么解释?Published material in professional publications written by others about the person我也做个作业,整理下AAO EB1A decision
USCIS应提高EB1的标准恳求某 AAO 决定书 (有包子答谢)
[绿卡和移民] 图解95%的中国留学生拿不到绿卡的根本原因 (转载)关于是否是第一作者文章被引:一个有用的AAO案例
S386!你们真的都苦逼专业做一辈子,不打算转行吗?怎样写好推荐信 EB1A/B
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: sij话题: us话题: eb4话题: who话题: those
进入Immigration版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
H********t
发帖数: 4
1
公开评论的页面在这里
https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=USCIS-2009-0004
留评论请点那个"comment now"
本文下半部分有我写的例子
千万记得这个是公开的 所以大家尽量用一些"本土化"的名字 而且一定要言之有物
比较推荐大家自己写 这样显得不像抄袭 again 尽量言之有物 否则有副作用
先给大家提供几个关键点 然后我贴一下我写的文章:
1. 因为EB4是employment based 因此建议USCIS引入要求 不能允许非法入境的人基于
此adjustment of status
根据Matter of H-G-G-, Adopted Decision 2019-01 (AAO Jul. 31, 2019)
如果TPS不能作为"合法身份"和之后的I485转换身份的话 非法入境的SIJ之后甚至都没
有TPS 并不可以转换身份交I485
可以建议它们转交难民庇护申请或者DACA申请 但EB4 SIJ至少需要合法入境记录 且至
少在"虐待、遗弃"之前需要保证合法居留 身份gap不超过180天 要求同其他EB
2. 鉴于USCIS有对SIJ的最终量裁权 建议要求USCIS对SIJ申请人要求他们提交证据证明
与美国的bonafide的关系
青少年法庭可以裁定申请人被遗弃 但青少年一般无法裁定外籍申请人是否在母国有更
合理的监护人 因此如果申请人想因此在美国长期居住 需要至少证明他们与美国有
bonafide的关系 如果被收养则需要归类为收养子女移民类别
3. SIJ绿卡不允许提交父母或兄弟姐妹移民申请 因为需要证明申请人已经de facto被
遗弃
这个写不写无所谓
1和2估计可以拦住绝大多数SIJ了
4. SIJ绿卡的初衷是真正需要的受虐待被遗弃的儿童和少年 不要给伪造证据以及完全
由行事能力的准成年人
(感谢DanielChai补充)
还有就是需要大家知道这个是征求公开意见 所以一定要写得言之有物 避免抄袭
各种情绪化的留言都会有副作用
附:我写的comments 写得比较匆忙 请忽略比较明显的typo和语法错误:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JcJhMG1Dvtj1uq_z4Nnvbm3apUVRbuN04Ib_1Hp5
_wM/edit?usp=sharing
As someone who is fairly familiar with United States immigration laws and
regulations, I am commenting to provide my feedback based on my decade of
experience regarding US immigration law.
The purpose of Employment Based 4th preference (EB4) special immigrant visa
is to create a special category for Employment Based immigrants who are not
otherwise eligible for regular EB 1-3 categories, such as religious worker
and aliens with certain relationship with US government and/or military
troops. Therefore, certain criteria has to be met in order to grant an
immigration petition and consequently adjustment of status.
The original purpose for the category of special immigrant is to protect
alien dependents who are already living in the US from domestic violence and
/or other unforeseen life challenges. For instance, EB4 VAWA helped many
women and children that were brought into the US by scam marriage or even
human trafficking but faced the tragedy experience of being abused
afterwards. It was a great bipartisan move for protecting human rights.
However, since 2014, issues arose in the EB4 category. The sudden shortage
of the EB4 visa jeopardize many legal immigrants who might have faced issues
in their daily lives. Specifically, rather than its purpose of protecting
the abused family members, the EB4 special immigrant juvenile category
started to be abused by certain groups of immigrants. The otherwise unused
visa quota which should have been reserved for protecting people who really
need help are being used by people entered the country without inspection,
admission or parole and claimed that they are abandoned by foreign parents.
This is not a stand alone issue. The long lasting abuse of the sacred EB4
visa has been identified numerous of times, for instance by department of
homeland security on Feb 15 2018 with news entitled "Unaccompanied Alien
Children and Family Units Are Flooding the Border Because of Catch and
Release Loopholes" https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/15/unaccompanied-alien-
children-and-family-units-are-flooding-border-because-catch-and
In order to protect the people who really need the help of EB4 visas, we
suggest that,
(1)
As an employment based immigration category, USCIS shall adapt similar rule
during I-485 adjustment of status filing for all EB categories, including
EB4 SIJ. Specifically, the petitioner/beneficiary shall provide evidence
such as I-94 entry record showing that the most recent entry to the US was
legal admittance/parole. For those who are claiming to be a victim of
domestic violence or being abandoned, they should provide evidence that
there has been no gaps in their legal status during their presence in the US
through the time they file a case through the juvenile court since the last
entry (or the gaps are within the grace period as allowed). For those who
are overstayed, they should be applying for status such as TPS. For those
who entered the US without inspection, admittance or parole, they should
apply for asylum. According to Matter of H-G-G-, Adopted Decision 2019-01 (
AAO Jul. 31, 2019), those who entered the US without legal record, even may
have lived under TPS for years, shall not be entitled to file I-485
adjustment of status under EB category.
(2) For those alien juveniles who claimed that they have been abandoned, on
top of legal entry record, they should provide evidence showing that they
have bona fide relationship to the US. This is to show that staying in the
US is of the best interest to those petitioners. In most cases, reunifying
with relatives living in the home country is the best options for abandoned
juveniles, rather than leaving them in a "foreign country" to them.
Therefore a bona fide relationship shall be established to proof that
staying in the US is to their best interest. For those who have already been
adopted, the family based category for adoption is much faster and much
more convenient to use.
(3) SIJ shall be reserved for those underaged juveniles who were legally
admitted to the country but need the greatest help. Therefore, SIJ
petitioners with ages less than ten years old shall take higher priority
than petitioners with age 18-21 without severe disabilities.
Again, we are trying to help those people who are in the greatest need of
this special visa category. All those proposed suggestions are bare minimum
requirements for all other EB categories. For the human rights of those who
were admitted to this country legally, for them to live without fear and
danger, we hope our voice can be heard.
E*****o
发帖数: 1
2
支持!
c*****n
发帖数: 81
3
已经有62个评论啦。我看有的评论写的很随意啊。
c*****n
发帖数: 81
4
赞教皇哥效率!
H********t
发帖数: 4
5
很多都是2013以前的评论 这一波目前只有五六个
随意的评论当然可以 不过我觉得想make our words heard 还是需要写得言之有物一点
要不然和白宫那个请愿没神马区别了。。哈哈

【在 c*****n 的大作中提到】
: 已经有62个评论啦。我看有的评论写的很随意啊。
D********i
发帖数: 103
6
提供个思路
不要反对SIJ。SIJ取消不了,但是可以要求USCIS严格遵守条款,把SIJ绿卡发给真正需
要的受虐待被遗弃的儿童和少年,不要给伪造证据以及完全由行事能力的准成年人。

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 公开评论的页面在这里
: https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=USCIS-2009-0004
: 留评论请点那个"comment now"
: 本文下半部分有我写的例子
: 千万记得这个是公开的 所以大家尽量用一些"本土化"的名字 而且一定要言之有物
: 比较推荐大家自己写 这样显得不像抄袭 again 尽量言之有物 否则有副作用
: 先给大家提供几个关键点 然后我贴一下我写的文章:
: 1. 因为EB4是employment based 因此建议USCIS引入要求 不能允许非法入境的人基于
: 此adjustment of status
: 根据Matter of H-G-G-, Adopted Decision 2019-01 (AAO Jul. 31, 2019)

H********t
发帖数: 4
7
根据我昨天发的AAO判例里AOC那个判例 州政府认定是未成年人就是未成年人
所以这个很可能很难
不过可以作为一个很好的generic的comment
我加进main text里

【在 D********i 的大作中提到】
: 提供个思路
: 不要反对SIJ。SIJ取消不了,但是可以要求USCIS严格遵守条款,把SIJ绿卡发给真正需
: 要的受虐待被遗弃的儿童和少年,不要给伪造证据以及完全由行事能力的准成年人。

H********t
发帖数: 4
8
建议用Safari 我用Chrome每次都不能提交成功
链接在这里:
https://www.regulations.gov/comment?D=USCIS-2009-0004-0059
强烈建议大家自己写 看起来评论要经过审核(囧 说好的言论自由呢)
receipt为证
[email protected] [email protected] via gmail.com
10:30 PM (2 minutes ago)
to Hierophant
Regulations Logo
Please do not reply to this message. This email is from a notification only
address that cannot accept incoming email.
Your comment was submitted successfully!
Comment Tracking Number: xxx
Your comment may be viewable on Regulations.gov once the agency has reviewed
it. This process is dependent on agency public submission policies/
procedures and processing times. Use your tracking number to find out the
status of your comment.
Agency: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
Document Type: Rulemaking
Title: Special Immigrant Juvenile Petitions; Reopening of Comment Period
Document ID: USCIS-2009-0004-0059
下边是我的评论 大家可以参考 但很可能大家不会像我一样有耐心写这么长。。
Comment:
As someone who is fairly familiar with United States immigration laws and
regulations, I am commenting to provide my feedback based on my decade of
experience regarding US immigration law.
The purpose of Employment Based 4th preference (EB4) special immigrant visa
is to create a special category for Employment Based immigrants who are not
otherwise eligible for regular EB 1-3 categories, such as religious worker
and aliens with certain relationship with US government and/or military
troops. Therefore, certain criteria has to be met in order to grant an
immigration petition and consequently adjustment of status.
The original purpose for the category of special immigrant is to protect
alien dependents who are already living in the US from domestic violence and
/or other unforeseen life challenges. For instance, EB4 VAWA helped many
women and children that were brought into the US by scam marriage or even
human trafficking but faced the tragedy experience of being abused
afterwards. It was a great bipartisan move for protecting human rights.
However, since 2014, issues arose in the EB4 category. The sudden shortage
of the EB4 visa jeopardize many legal immigrants who might have faced issues
in their daily lives. Specifically, rather than its purpose of protecting
the abused family members, the EB4 special immigrant juvenile category
started to be abused by certain groups of immigrants. The otherwise unused
visa quota which should have been reserved for protecting people who really
need help are being used by people entered the country without inspection,
admission or parole and claimed that they are abandoned by foreign parents.
This is not a stand alone issue. The long lasting abuse of the sacred EB4
visa has been identified numerous of times, for instance by department of
homeland security on Feb 15 2018 with news entitled "Unaccompanied Alien
Children and Family Units Are Flooding the Border Because of Catch and
Release Loopholes" [URL REMOVED]
In order to protect the people who really need the help of EB4 visas, we
suggest that,
(1)
As an employment based immigration category, USCIS shall adapt similar rule
during I-485 adjustment of status filing for all EB categories, including
EB4 SIJ. Specifically, the petitioner/beneficiary shall provide evidence
such as I-94 entry record showing that the most recent entry to the US was
legal admittance/parole. For those who are claiming to be a victim of
domestic violence or being abandoned, they should provide evidence that
there has been no gaps in their legal status during their presence in the US
through the time they file a case through the juvenile court since the last
entry (or the gaps are within the grace period as allowed). For those who
are overstayed, they should be applying for status such as TPS. For those
who entered the US without inspection, admittance or parole, they should
apply for asylum. According to Matter of H-G-G-, Adopted Decision 2019-01 (
AAO Jul. 31, 2019), those who entered the US without legal record, even may
have lived under TPS for years, shall not be entitled to file I-485
adjustment of status under EB category.
(2) For those alien juveniles who claimed that they have been abandoned, on
top of legal entry record, they should provide evidence showing that they
have bona fide relationship to the US. This is to show that staying in the
US is of the best interest to those petitioners. In most cases, reunifying
with relatives living in the home country is the best options for abandoned
juveniles, rather than leaving them in a "foreign country" to them.
Therefore a bona fide relationship shall be established to proof that
staying in the US is to their best interest. For those who have already been
adopted, the family based category for adoption is much faster and much
more convenient to use.
(3) SIJ shall be reserved for those underaged juveniles who were legally
admitted to the country but need the greatest help. Therefore, SIJ
petitioners with ages less than ten years old shall take higher priority
than petitioners with age 18-21 without severe disabilities.
Again, we are trying to help those people who are in the greatest need of
this special visa category. All those proposed suggestions are bare minimum
requirements for all other EB categories. For the human rights of those who
were admitted to this country legally, for them to live without fear and
danger, we hope our voice can be heard.
Uploaded File(s):
No files uploaded
This information will appear on Regulations.gov:
None of the information will appear on Regulations.gov
This information will not appear on Regulations.gov:
First Name: Anonymous
Last Name: Anonymous

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 公开评论的页面在这里
: https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=USCIS-2009-0004
: 留评论请点那个"comment now"
: 本文下半部分有我写的例子
: 千万记得这个是公开的 所以大家尽量用一些"本土化"的名字 而且一定要言之有物
: 比较推荐大家自己写 这样显得不像抄袭 again 尽量言之有物 否则有副作用
: 先给大家提供几个关键点 然后我贴一下我写的文章:
: 1. 因为EB4是employment based 因此建议USCIS引入要求 不能允许非法入境的人基于
: 此adjustment of status
: 根据Matter of H-G-G-, Adopted Decision 2019-01 (AAO Jul. 31, 2019)

c*****n
发帖数: 81
9
太赞了!赞行动力!赞表达!赞逻辑!
E*****o
发帖数: 1
10
写得太好了!

only

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 建议用Safari 我用Chrome每次都不能提交成功
: 链接在这里:
: https://www.regulations.gov/comment?D=USCIS-2009-0004-0059
: 强烈建议大家自己写 看起来评论要经过审核(囧 说好的言论自由呢)
: receipt为证
: [email protected] [email protected] via gmail.com
: 10:30 PM (2 minutes ago)
: to Hierophant
: Regulations Logo
: Please do not reply to this message. This email is from a notification only

相关主题
[绿卡和移民] 图解95%的中国留学生拿不到绿卡的根本原因 (转载)最好的方案是留80%以上的名额给美国毕业的留学生
S386!你们真的都苦逼专业做一辈子,不打算转行吗?我们能否游说USCIS给I-140批准且在美国境内的申请者EAD
S386的问题是其极端性,相当于阶级专政大家注意reference letter里面不要有重复
进入Immigration版参与讨论
j*********j
发帖数: 17
11
我也提交了,希望大家都能提交评论
Agency: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
Document Type: Rulemaking
Title: Special Immigrant Juvenile Petitions; Reopening of Comment Period
Document ID: USCIS-2009-0004-0059
Comment:
See attached file(s)

only

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 建议用Safari 我用Chrome每次都不能提交成功
: 链接在这里:
: https://www.regulations.gov/comment?D=USCIS-2009-0004-0059
: 强烈建议大家自己写 看起来评论要经过审核(囧 说好的言论自由呢)
: receipt为证
: [email protected] [email protected] via gmail.com
: 10:30 PM (2 minutes ago)
: to Hierophant
: Regulations Logo
: Please do not reply to this message. This email is from a notification only

H********t
发帖数: 4
12
刚刚更新了文章内容 把要点整合到了一起 方便阅读
如果大家有兴趣的话可以直接把我主题文转发
感谢大家帮助
http://mitbbs.com/article1/Immigration/34033057_3_0.html

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 公开评论的页面在这里
: https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=USCIS-2009-0004
: 留评论请点那个"comment now"
: 本文下半部分有我写的例子
: 千万记得这个是公开的 所以大家尽量用一些"本土化"的名字 而且一定要言之有物
: 比较推荐大家自己写 这样显得不像抄袭 again 尽量言之有物 否则有副作用
: 先给大家提供几个关键点 然后我贴一下我写的文章:
: 1. 因为EB4是employment based 因此建议USCIS引入要求 不能允许非法入境的人基于
: 此adjustment of status
: 根据Matter of H-G-G-, Adopted Decision 2019-01 (AAO Jul. 31, 2019)

H********t
发帖数: 4
13
看到昨天又有两个留言了 可惜一看就是白左的废话评论。。。
请大家帮忙 继续为USCIS停止EB4 SIJ留言
这几天估计因为奥本新指示 又让大家有了不同的意见了
吵架不管用 再怎么吵 我们分到的蛋糕一点都不会变多
有这功夫 不如去给USCIS写评论 反EB4 SIJ被非法移民abuse
好歹多点蛋糕渣 也不需要我们花巨款去氪金游说
11月15号截止
严查一个SIJ 少抢一个EB1
多走一个EB1 少挤一个NIW
少挤一个NIW 少一个升降级
行千里不能一蹴而就 好歹我们可以积点跬步
多谢大家!

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 公开评论的页面在这里
: https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=USCIS-2009-0004
: 留评论请点那个"comment now"
: 本文下半部分有我写的例子
: 千万记得这个是公开的 所以大家尽量用一些"本土化"的名字 而且一定要言之有物
: 比较推荐大家自己写 这样显得不像抄袭 again 尽量言之有物 否则有副作用
: 先给大家提供几个关键点 然后我贴一下我写的文章:
: 1. 因为EB4是employment based 因此建议USCIS引入要求 不能允许非法入境的人基于
: 此adjustment of status
: 根据Matter of H-G-G-, Adopted Decision 2019-01 (AAO Jul. 31, 2019)

d******u
发帖数: 1
14
支持

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 看到昨天又有两个留言了 可惜一看就是白左的废话评论。。。
: 请大家帮忙 继续为USCIS停止EB4 SIJ留言
: 这几天估计因为奥本新指示 又让大家有了不同的意见了
: 吵架不管用 再怎么吵 我们分到的蛋糕一点都不会变多
: 有这功夫 不如去给USCIS写评论 反EB4 SIJ被非法移民abuse
: 好歹多点蛋糕渣 也不需要我们花巨款去氪金游说
: 11月15号截止
: 严查一个SIJ 少抢一个EB1
: 多走一个EB1 少挤一个NIW
: 少挤一个NIW 少一个升降级

j******j
发帖数: 8
15
我已经提交了评论了,不过我看群里回应的人很少,完全没有前一段时间s386那么疯狂。
不知道是人们不觉醒还是咱们号召力太差,比不上卡卡联盟那么能忽悠。卡卡联盟是真
行,卖了他们他们都能帮着数钞票,不知道他们怎么做到的。

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 看到昨天又有两个留言了 可惜一看就是白左的废话评论。。。
: 请大家帮忙 继续为USCIS停止EB4 SIJ留言
: 这几天估计因为奥本新指示 又让大家有了不同的意见了
: 吵架不管用 再怎么吵 我们分到的蛋糕一点都不会变多
: 有这功夫 不如去给USCIS写评论 反EB4 SIJ被非法移民abuse
: 好歹多点蛋糕渣 也不需要我们花巨款去氪金游说
: 11月15号截止
: 严查一个SIJ 少抢一个EB1
: 多走一个EB1 少挤一个NIW
: 少挤一个NIW 少一个升降级

H********t
发帖数: 4
16
非常感谢帮忙转发。。
我觉得我已经很努力写文了 不论中文版还是我那个长的评论都挺努力的了
我把我那个主题帖也尽量往吸引眼球的方向改了
比较不理解的是 严查EB4 SIJ这个事情 基本跟任何华人的利益都不冲突 基本大家都支
持这个严查的行为 但感觉依旧不入cacaa和一亩三分地的法眼 完全没多少人关注。。。
事实上发到了careerengine上 有那个评论区里的一个叫奥本的爷爷的网红站台 即便如
此 也没多少人关注。。

狂。

【在 j******j 的大作中提到】
: 我已经提交了评论了,不过我看群里回应的人很少,完全没有前一段时间s386那么疯狂。
: 不知道是人们不觉醒还是咱们号召力太差,比不上卡卡联盟那么能忽悠。卡卡联盟是真
: 行,卖了他们他们都能帮着数钞票,不知道他们怎么做到的。

j******j
发帖数: 8
17
大部分人不懂得如何操纵,所以就没人关注,即使和他们自己利益相关。
只有会操作或者炒作,即使在损害他们利益,他们也会拼了嗓子喊。充分证明大部分人
都是没脑子的。

。。

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 非常感谢帮忙转发。。
: 我觉得我已经很努力写文了 不论中文版还是我那个长的评论都挺努力的了
: 我把我那个主题帖也尽量往吸引眼球的方向改了
: 比较不理解的是 严查EB4 SIJ这个事情 基本跟任何华人的利益都不冲突 基本大家都支
: 持这个严查的行为 但感觉依旧不入cacaa和一亩三分地的法眼 完全没多少人关注。。。
: 事实上发到了careerengine上 有那个评论区里的一个叫奥本的爷爷的网红站台 即便如
: 此 也没多少人关注。。
:
: 狂。

j******j
发帖数: 8
18
我去trackiit上喊一喊找印度人帮帮忙吧

。。

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 非常感谢帮忙转发。。
: 我觉得我已经很努力写文了 不论中文版还是我那个长的评论都挺努力的了
: 我把我那个主题帖也尽量往吸引眼球的方向改了
: 比较不理解的是 严查EB4 SIJ这个事情 基本跟任何华人的利益都不冲突 基本大家都支
: 持这个严查的行为 但感觉依旧不入cacaa和一亩三分地的法眼 完全没多少人关注。。。
: 事实上发到了careerengine上 有那个评论区里的一个叫奥本的爷爷的网红站台 即便如
: 此 也没多少人关注。。
:
: 狂。

H********t
发帖数: 4
19
其实每个社会都是这样 欧洲人也是如此
比如19世纪末某著名作品"丑陋的欧洲人" (Psychologie des Foules)
但不管怎么样 多几个人看 多几个人转发 也许会多一点给USCIS的有点干货的评论
我们能做的事情有限 但能做一点是一点

【在 j******j 的大作中提到】
: 大部分人不懂得如何操纵,所以就没人关注,即使和他们自己利益相关。
: 只有会操作或者炒作,即使在损害他们利益,他们也会拼了嗓子喊。充分证明大部分人
: 都是没脑子的。
:
: 。。

H********t
发帖数: 4
20
非常感谢!!
我其实想转发到IV的 但IV这个组织也开始极端化了 所有人都要求实名 包括telegram
的群也都必须实名 感觉有点往氵去车仑工力的方法发展
严查EB4 SIJ这个事情可能会激发拉美人和亚洲人的矛盾 拉美人才不管合法违法 所以
千万记得不要写得太过分夸张 毕竟trackiit都是英语
谢谢啦!

【在 j******j 的大作中提到】
: 我去trackiit上喊一喊找印度人帮帮忙吧
:
: 。。

相关主题
我也做个作业,整理下AAO EB1A decision怎样写好推荐信 EB1A/B
恳求某 AAO 决定书 (有包子答谢)新手真心请教NIW
关于是否是第一作者文章被引:一个有用的AAO案例学习AAO的EB1B administrative decision心得
进入Immigration版参与讨论
H********t
发帖数: 4
21
哎 哥们 内斗有的是场子 但现在这个事情需要大家团结起来一致对外 合法vs非法
谢谢啦

【在 d******u 的大作中提到】
: 支持
d******u
发帖数: 1
22
填过了,不知道有没有用

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 哎 哥们 内斗有的是场子 但现在这个事情需要大家团结起来一致对外 合法vs非法
: 谢谢啦

c*****n
发帖数: 81
23
这个事情有门槛啊,没几个人能花时间写那么多有干货的回复。打电话多容易,模板都
给写好了,照着念就行了。包括我本人,这个星期还没时间弄这个,希望周末能攒点时
间去回复。另外,我也在各个群宣传了,不知道效果如何。
H********t
发帖数: 4
24
哎 这倒是 大家确实不一定能有空写长篇有内容的回复
非常感谢宣传!!!!
而且 这件事情事实上一开头还是你提醒我的
如果最后我们可以促成严查 我们也要非常感谢你提醒大家USCIS重开评论这件事。。

【在 c*****n 的大作中提到】
: 这个事情有门槛啊,没几个人能花时间写那么多有干货的回复。打电话多容易,模板都
: 给写好了,照着念就行了。包括我本人,这个星期还没时间弄这个,希望周末能攒点时
: 间去回复。另外,我也在各个群宣传了,不知道效果如何。

c*****n
发帖数: 81
25
不敢当不敢当,都是群友提醒的。

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 哎 这倒是 大家确实不一定能有空写长篇有内容的回复
: 非常感谢宣传!!!!
: 而且 这件事情事实上一开头还是你提醒我的
: 如果最后我们可以促成严查 我们也要非常感谢你提醒大家USCIS重开评论这件事。。

H********t
发帖数: 4
26
status update - 目前为止这一波征集评论收到了25个new comments
数据不一定实时 因为regulations.gov有人审核 审核过了才能发
感谢大家花时间去写评论! 写得越详细越好 但短评只要说得明白也有莫大帮助
鉴于上一波收集评论收集到了大概五六十条 我觉得至少我们要接近这个数字吧。。。
所以如果大家有心 请大家转发这个消息到其他在苦等排期的群里
还有一个建议就是: 尽量不要过多提及对中国的eb1排期的影响
逻辑上 严查EB4 SIJ可以帮到我们的EB1和间接帮到我们的EB23 但对于那些看评论的公
众来说 他们不会care我们的EB123到底排期怎么样 他们care的是移民法有没有这种明
显的把非法入境的人堂而皇之放进来迅速给绿卡的漏洞
我们需要强调的是 EB4 SIJ被abuse是一件不合规也不合法的事情
论点见文章的几个建议
11月15号截止 这是目前合法框架下 我们能迅速做到的做大蛋糕(哪怕只有一点点)的
best bet
感谢大家帮忙!

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 公开评论的页面在这里
: https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=USCIS-2009-0004
: 留评论请点那个"comment now"
: 本文下半部分有我写的例子
: 千万记得这个是公开的 所以大家尽量用一些"本土化"的名字 而且一定要言之有物
: 比较推荐大家自己写 这样显得不像抄袭 again 尽量言之有物 否则有副作用
: 先给大家提供几个关键点 然后我贴一下我写的文章:
: 1. 因为EB4是employment based 因此建议USCIS引入要求 不能允许非法入境的人基于
: 此adjustment of status
: 根据Matter of H-G-G-, Adopted Decision 2019-01 (AAO Jul. 31, 2019)

H********t
发帖数: 4
27
写了一个法律层面的解释 表达一下 我尽力了。。。
Your comment:
Comment:
According to USCIS regulation special immigrant juvenile (SIJ)
classification, it is specified that "If you committed a particular act or
violation of immigration law, you may be barred from adjusting status. If
you are classified as an SIJ, you are exempt from all bars to adjustment
except the terrorist-related adjustment bar in section 245(c)(6) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)." However, the exemptions lack
adequate laws to support its legitimacy.
According to INA § 245 (8 USC § 1255) (h) which in applying this section
to a special immigrant described in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(J), it requires
that " (1) such an immigrant shall be deemed, for purposes of subsection (a)
, to have been paroled into the United States, and (2) in determining the
alien's admissibility as an immigrant - (A) paragraphs (4), (5)(A), (6)(A),
(6)(C), (6)(D), (7)(A), and (9)(B) of section 1182(a) of this title shall
not apply; and (B) the Attorney General may waive other paragraphs of
section 1182(a) of this title (other than paragraphs (2)(A), (2)(B), (2)(C)
(except for so much of such paragraph as related to a single offense of
simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana), (3)(A), (3)(B), (3)(C),
and (3)(E)) in the case of individual aliens for humanitarian purposes,
family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest.".
Therefore, it is required that the immigrant shall be legally paroled into
the United States in the first place.
Furthermore, when determining the inadmissibility, in section 1182(a)
paragraphs (6)(A)(ii) Exception for certain battered women and children it
stated that, clause (i) (In general, an alien present in the United States
without being admitted or paroled, or who arrives in the United States at
any time or place other than as designated by the Attorney General, is
inadmissible.) shall not apply to an alien who demonstrates that-
(I) the alien is a VAWA self-petitioner;
(II)(a) the alien has been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a
spouse or parent, or by a member of the spouse's or parent's family residing
in the same household as the alien and the spouse or parent consented or
acquiesced to such battery or cruelty, or (b) the alien's child has been
battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a spouse or parent of the alien
(without the active participation of the alien in the battery or cruelty) or
by a member of the spouse's or parent's family residing in the same
household as the alien when the spouse or parent consented to or acquiesced
in such battery or cruelty and the alien did not actively participate in
such battery or cruelty, and
(III) there was a substantial connection between the battery or cruelty
described in subclause (I) or (II) and the alien's unlawful entry into the
United States.
According to the above mentioned paragraph regarding the exemption of
inadmissibility, parole is viable to be obtained in the case that the SIJ
self petitioner(s) entered the United States without inspection, admittance
or parole.
With that said, according to current immigration law, the application of of
I-485 adjustment of status shall based on legal admittance and/or parole. in
the case that SIJ self petitions entered the United States without
inspection, admittance or parole, they shall first apply for parole and re-
enter the United States in order to get the I-485 to be processed.

【在 H********t 的大作中提到】
: 公开评论的页面在这里
: https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=USCIS-2009-0004
: 留评论请点那个"comment now"
: 本文下半部分有我写的例子
: 千万记得这个是公开的 所以大家尽量用一些"本土化"的名字 而且一定要言之有物
: 比较推荐大家自己写 这样显得不像抄袭 again 尽量言之有物 否则有副作用
: 先给大家提供几个关键点 然后我贴一下我写的文章:
: 1. 因为EB4是employment based 因此建议USCIS引入要求 不能允许非法入境的人基于
: 此adjustment of status
: 根据Matter of H-G-G-, Adopted Decision 2019-01 (AAO Jul. 31, 2019)

p**********7
发帖数: 122
28
转载到了一亩三分地,不知道会不会有人关心
1 (共1页)
进入Immigration版参与讨论
相关主题
新手真心请教NIW求助: EB1这个条件怎么解释?Published material in professional publications written by others about the person
学习AAO的EB1B administrative decision心得USCIS应提高EB1的标准
Eb-1A approved after RFE-----outline posted[绿卡和移民] 图解95%的中国留学生拿不到绿卡的根本原因 (转载)
推荐信里千万别用“a rising star of ...”之类的话S386!你们真的都苦逼专业做一辈子,不打算转行吗?
现在还没386的消息 看来风头被弹劾盖过去了S386的问题是其极端性,相当于阶级专政
既然移民改革无望 给大家提几个也许可行的脑洞吧最好的方案是留80%以上的名额给美国毕业的留学生
如果我对IV语焉不详的twitter理解正确的话我们能否游说USCIS给I-140批准且在美国境内的申请者EAD
请教一个问题 关于485pending大家注意reference letter里面不要有重复
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: sij话题: us话题: eb4话题: who话题: those