|
|
|
|
|
x**********2 发帖数: 14 | 1 华盛顿邮报上的, 说是不填middle name,不填apt号码,统统都要据。
求核实这篇报道的真实性。
http://t.ly/i2ac
Last fall, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services introduced perhaps its
most arbitrary, absurd modification yet to the immigration system: It began
rejecting applications unless every single field was filled in, even those
that obviously did not pertain to the applicant.
“Middle name” field left blank because the applicant does not have a
middle name? Sorry, your application gets rejected. No apartment number
because you live in a house? You’re rejected, too.
No address given for your parents because they’re dead? No siblings named
because you’re an only child? No work history dates because you’re an 8-
year-old kid?
All real cases, all rejected. | r*x 发帖数: 411 | 2 应该是只适用于I-589和I-918
【在 x**********2 的大作中提到】 : 华盛顿邮报上的, 说是不填middle name,不填apt号码,统统都要据。 : 求核实这篇报道的真实性。 : http://t.ly/i2ac : Last fall, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services introduced perhaps its : most arbitrary, absurd modification yet to the immigration system: It began : rejecting applications unless every single field was filled in, even those : that obviously did not pertain to the applicant. : “Middle name” field left blank because the applicant does not have a : middle name? Sorry, your application gets rejected. No apartment number : because you live in a house? You’re rejected, too.
| x**********2 发帖数: 14 | 3 我感觉也应该是。要是485那么搞早就鸡飞狗跳了。华邮这篇专栏作者可能不了解所有
的情况。把针对个别的表格说成是所有的移民表格了。
http://bit.ly/3a9pcxU
【在 r*x 的大作中提到】 : 应该是只适用于I-589和I-918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|