t******h
发帖数: 519 | 1 今天和一家公司签订LEASE，其中竟然有这样一句话：
FURTHER, LANDLORD AND ITS AGENTS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO TENANT, HIS OR HER
FAMILY, GUESTS, OR INVITEES FOR INJURY TO ANY PERSON OR PET, NOR FOR LOSS OR
DAMAGE TO PROPERTY (INCLUDING PROPERTY OF TENANT) OCCURRING IN OR ABOUT THE
PREMISES FROM ANY CAUSE WHATSOEVER, EVEN IF THE DAMAGES OR INJURIES ARE
ALLEGED TO BE THE FAULT OF OR CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE, CARELESSNESS OR FAULT
OF LANDLORD AND/OR LANDLORD'S AGENTS.
这显然是不公平的。
并且我倾向于认为，这个条款是无效的，因为这种对LANDLORD的免责条款显然缺乏法理依
据。即 | f*****w
发帖数: 43 | 2 1) this clause is enforceable. It is the bargaining result and there is no
fraud or deceit. You can chose not signing the contract when you saw this
clause. Once you signed, it is presumed to be enforceable in courts.
2) The clause may be deemed unconcionable and unenforceable by courts if you
can prove that you have no any other choices when you signed the
contract.(frankly, you cannot prove that because there is a leasing market in
any city, I do not think that this company is the only company
【在 t******h 的大作中提到】
: 今天和一家公司签订LEASE，其中竟然有这样一句话：
: FURTHER, LANDLORD AND ITS AGENTS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO TENANT, HIS OR HER
: FAMILY, GUESTS, OR INVITEES FOR INJURY TO ANY PERSON OR PET, NOR FOR LOSS OR
: DAMAGE TO PROPERTY (INCLUDING PROPERTY OF TENANT) OCCURRING IN OR ABOUT THE
: PREMISES FROM ANY CAUSE WHATSOEVER, EVEN IF THE DAMAGES OR INJURIES ARE
: ALLEGED TO BE THE FAULT OF OR CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE, CARELESSNESS OR FAULT
: OF LANDLORD AND/OR LANDLORD'S AGENTS.
: 这显然是不公平的。
: 并且我倾向于认为，这个条款是无效的，因为这种对LANDLORD的免责条款显然缺乏法理依
: 据。即
|
|
