由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Law版 - 蚁力神事件
相关主题
弱问: 拿了理科PHD再申请law school的时候看哪个GPA呢?got acceptance from Georgetown Law
Law School Is A Ponzi Scheme在美国成立公司
Good Suggestion for PHD->JD (zt)纽约的移民律师事务所
请教美国公司破产的问题what is Early Decision?
Who's applying this year?One question about practicing IP law
不知LIABILITY是否COVER 路灯?xdjm请进来看,LL.M毕业的那个方向好啊?
60天grace period的问题Chinese做的了civil rights吗?
毕业了有点困惑 求助,车在公司的地下停车场被撬了!
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: government话题: investment话题: china话题: medical
进入Law版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
c**d
发帖数: 3888
1
If this happened in the US, the scheme would likely have been an "investment
contract" and subject to the tough federal securities laws.
From reading the news, it seems that the company faces no security law
liabilities in China. The investors are screwed.
Anyone would like to chime in?
This is not legal advice. You're not my client and your problem is not mine.
W*********r
发帖数: 98
2
W*********r
发帖数: 98
3
There are no securities liabilities in China. Practically, investors made
their business decisions based on government's certification of 蚁力神's
medical effect. That trust is the assumption of their conclusion -- because
government cannot certify something that's unfounded.
It is beyond our knowledge whether 蚁力神 tricked
government or simply conspired with government in this scheme. THe gist
is, government shall be aware of the fact that people WILL base their
business decisions on governm

【在 c**d 的大作中提到】
: If this happened in the US, the scheme would likely have been an "investment
: contract" and subject to the tough federal securities laws.
: From reading the news, it seems that the company faces no security law
: liabilities in China. The investors are screwed.
: Anyone would like to chime in?
: This is not legal advice. You're not my client and your problem is not mine.

c**d
发帖数: 3888
4
This was a ill-conceived investment vehicle to start with. The soundness of
medical-effect certification seems of little relevance to me.
In other words, the government certified that "we think this product has
positive medical effect," not "we think you should invest in this company."
Of course, one will base investment decisions based on this medical-effect
certification, but one should also take into account all the investment
risks, including the risk that the medical certification was flawe

【在 W*********r 的大作中提到】
: There are no securities liabilities in China. Practically, investors made
: their business decisions based on government's certification of 蚁力神's
: medical effect. That trust is the assumption of their conclusion -- because
: government cannot certify something that's unfounded.
: It is beyond our knowledge whether 蚁力神 tricked
: government or simply conspired with government in this scheme. THe gist
: is, government shall be aware of the fact that people WILL base their
: business decisions on governm

1 (共1页)
进入Law版参与讨论
相关主题
求助,车在公司的地下停车场被撬了!Who's applying this year?
The Curmudgeon’s Guide to Practicing Law不知LIABILITY是否COVER 路灯?
申请LLM求教60天grace period的问题
交通工程MS 去法学院前景怎么样?毕业了有点困惑
弱问: 拿了理科PHD再申请law school的时候看哪个GPA呢?got acceptance from Georgetown Law
Law School Is A Ponzi Scheme在美国成立公司
Good Suggestion for PHD->JD (zt)纽约的移民律师事务所
请教美国公司破产的问题what is Early Decision?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: government话题: investment话题: china话题: medical