s*******1
发帖数: 135 | 1 Martha's friend, who is very knowledgeable about edible flowers, told Martha
that there are no edible daisies, at least not any that are palatable.
Martha, however, reasons that since there are daisies that are a kind of
chrysanthemum and since there are edible chrysanthemums that are quite
palatable, what her friend told her must be incorrect.
Which one of the following has a flawed pattern of reasoning most like that
in Martha's reasoning?
A. Jeanne is member of the city chorus, and the city c | s*******1
发帖数: 135 | | s*******1
发帖数: 135 | | t*******s
发帖数: 17 | 4 stimulus:
Friend: Palable -> ~ Edible
Martha: Daisy <-some-> Chry
Chry <- some -> Palable -> Edible
-----------------------------------------------
Daisy <- some -> Pallable -> Edible
The flaw of Martha's argument is combining some statements. | s*******1
发帖数: 135 | 5 Ding! Thank you. I got it now. |
|
