j******n
发帖数: 21641 | 1 这个可以作为现代判断抄袭的一个范本
Zakaria's column about gun laws for Time's August 20 issue includes a
paragraph that is remarkably similar to one Jill Lepore wrote in April for a
New Yorker article about the National Rifle Association. (The similarities
were first flagged by NRANews.com and first reported by Tim Graham of the
conservative watchdog group Newsbusters, who leveled the plagiarism charge.)
From Lepore's New Yorker article:
As Adam Winkler, a constitutional-law scholar at U.C.L.A., demonstrates in a
remarkably nuanced new book, “Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear
Arms in America,” firearms have been regulated in the United States from
the start. Laws banning the carrying of concealed weapons were passed in
Kentucky and Louisiana in 1813, and other states soon followed: Indiana (
1820), Tennessee and Virginia (1838), Alabama (1839), and Ohio (1859).
Similar laws were passed in Texas, Florida, and Oklahoma. As the governor of
Texas explained in 1893, the “mission of the concealed deadly weapon is
murder. To check it is the duty of every self-respecting, law-abiding man.
From Zakaria's Time Magazine column:
Adam Winkler, a professor of constitutional law at UCLA, documents the
actual history in Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in
America. Guns were regulated in the U.S. from the earliest years of the
Republic. Laws that banned the carrying of concealed weapons were passed in
Kentucky and Louisiana in 1813. Other states soon followed: Indiana in 1820,
Tennessee and Virginia in 1838, Alabama in 1839 and Ohio in 1859. Similar
laws were passed in Texas, Florida and Oklahoma. As the governor of Texas (
Texas!) explained in 1893, the "mission of the concealed deadly weapon is
murder. To check it is the duty of every self-respecting, law-abiding man." |
b********n
发帖数: 16354 | 2 lol，这小段文字信息量这么丰富，怎么界定是抄袭呢～～几乎类似于编年表啊～～ |
n***y
发帖数: 33 | 3 It is too similar. especially in the sequence in which the author mentioning
names of states, for example, "Texas, Florida and Oklahoma."
In any case, any writer is expected to be aware of recent articles on the
same topic. |
b********n
发帖数: 16354 | 4 lol，原来如此啊～
mentioning
【在 n***y 的大作中提到】
: It is too similar. especially in the sequence in which the author mentioning
: names of states, for example, "Texas, Florida and Oklahoma."
: In any case, any writer is expected to be aware of recent articles on the
: same topic.
|
w***s
发帖数: 15642 | 5 会不会他们都是抄那本书的
【在 b********n 的大作中提到】
: lol，原来如此啊～
:
: mentioning
|
b*s
发帖数: 82482 | 6 但是summary都那么类似就不应该了
会不会他们都是抄那本书的
【在 w***s 的大作中提到】
: 会不会他们都是抄那本书的
|
T*******n
发帖数: 3229 | 7 两个都抄同一个summary。。。
subjective的比较容易判断，objective的比如都从某人的简历上扒一块，该怎么说？
【在 b*s 的大作中提到】
: 但是summary都那么类似就不应该了
:
: 会不会他们都是抄那本书的
|
l*r
发帖数: 79569 | 8 找到source就可以
【在 T*******n 的大作中提到】
: 两个都抄同一个summary。。。
: subjective的比较容易判断，objective的比如都从某人的简历上扒一块，该怎么说？
|
T*******n
发帖数: 3229 | 9 周末要把结网省的水补回来？
【在 l*r 的大作中提到】
: 找到source就可以
|
b*s
发帖数: 82482 | 10 两个人都是引用的同一本书，而不是同一本摘要。摘要写得太类似了。如果摘要简短的
话，完全照抄要打引号的，或者用缩进格式。
两个都抄同一个summary。。。
subjective的比较容易判断，objective的比如都从某人的简历上扒一块，该怎么说？
【在 T*******n 的大作中提到】
: 两个都抄同一个summary。。。
: subjective的比较容易判断，objective的比如都从某人的简历上扒一块，该怎么说？
|
|
|
j******n
发帖数: 21641 | 11 中国人在文章中用古诗渐渐学会加引号了
a
similarities
.)
a
Bear
【在 j******n 的大作中提到】
: 这个可以作为现代判断抄袭的一个范本
: Zakaria's column about gun laws for Time's August 20 issue includes a
: paragraph that is remarkably similar to one Jill Lepore wrote in April for a
: New Yorker article about the National Rifle Association. (The similarities
: were first flagged by NRANews.com and first reported by Tim Graham of the
: conservative watchdog group Newsbusters, who leveled the plagiarism charge.)
: From Lepore's New Yorker article:
: As Adam Winkler, a constitutional-law scholar at U.C.L.A., demonstrates in a
: remarkably nuanced new book, “Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear
: Arms in America,” firearms have been regulated in the United States from
|
j******n
发帖数: 21641 | 12 塔木附近又出枪击案
昨天看了zakaria的文章，虽然两段极度相似，但说是抄袭乃至受处分，似乎过了点
a
similarities
.)
a
Bear
【在 j******n 的大作中提到】
: 这个可以作为现代判断抄袭的一个范本
: Zakaria's column about gun laws for Time's August 20 issue includes a
: paragraph that is remarkably similar to one Jill Lepore wrote in April for a
: New Yorker article about the National Rifle Association. (The similarities
: were first flagged by NRANews.com and first reported by Tim Graham of the
: conservative watchdog group Newsbusters, who leveled the plagiarism charge.)
: From Lepore's New Yorker article:
: As Adam Winkler, a constitutional-law scholar at U.C.L.A., demonstrates in a
: remarkably nuanced new book, “Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear
: Arms in America,” firearms have been regulated in the United States from
|
s**********y
发帖数: 8135 | 13 消息传的好快啊
【在 j******n 的大作中提到】
: 塔木附近又出枪击案
: 昨天看了zakaria的文章，虽然两段极度相似，但说是抄袭乃至受处分，似乎过了点
:
: a
: similarities
: .)
: a
: Bear
|
j******n
发帖数: 21641 | 14 德州农机的留学生春晚很有名啊
【在 s**********y 的大作中提到】
: 消息传的好快啊
|
j********1
发帖数: 628 | 15 这位爷的东东怎么会有人去看？都是些屁话加空话，还经常在电视上舌璨莲花，结果是
什么内容都没有。花又说回来，大多数columnist的东东都是屁话加空话，尤其是NYT的
专栏作者们，像什么猫琳道德，唾骂斯福利德慢之类的。 |
z*i
发帖数: 58873 | 16 恩，同意。
其实，慢慢的相对的我倒觉得越来越觉得david brooks的东西越来越对胃口了。
【在 j********1 的大作中提到】
: 这位爷的东东怎么会有人去看？都是些屁话加空话，还经常在电视上舌璨莲花，结果是
: 什么内容都没有。花又说回来，大多数columnist的东东都是屁话加空话，尤其是NYT的
: 专栏作者们，像什么猫琳道德，唾骂斯福利德慢之类的。
|
j******n
发帖数: 21641 | 17 文科能做到大报刊的专栏写手都算很成功了吧
【在 j********1 的大作中提到】
: 这位爷的东东怎么会有人去看？都是些屁话加空话，还经常在电视上舌璨莲花，结果是
: 什么内容都没有。花又说回来，大多数columnist的东东都是屁话加空话，尤其是NYT的
: 专栏作者们，像什么猫琳道德，唾骂斯福利德慢之类的。
|
j********1
发帖数: 628 | 18 He is reinstated by Time and CNN so readers can continue to enjoy him
plagiarizing himself and others. |
