z**h
发帖数: 153 | 1 原来一个Senior对我讲过，你在面试前会有一个自己prefer的Ranking list。实际上面
试对改变你原先的Ranking list作用不大。事实的确如此，面试后大部分program的印
象改变不大。Hopkins是少数几个面试改变了我的印象的program之一。去之前，听说过
很多负面news，例如Baltimore多么危险，Hopkins的training多么累，太多的
inpatient的training，outpatient training不够（Oncology绝大部分的临床工作是
Outpatient）等等。去了，看了，觉得Hopkins事实并非如此。
Interview process: 跟大多数面试一样，先是PD介绍，然后见了4个faculty member，
三个senior的physician scientists， 一个3年级的fellow。没有刁钻问题，4个人中3
个人在大力推荐program，推荐Baltimore没有大家说的那么差，基本上没问什么问题就
结束了。PD问的问题主要是对5-10年后的计划，对什么肿瘤感兴趣，对什么科研感兴趣
。然后问我对 |
c******k
发帖数: 237 | 2 赞！崇拜中！好长一段时间没见到如此振奋人心的帖子了。 |
t****o
发帖数: 342 | |
d******a
发帖数: 127 | 4 >> Hopkins的工作量非常大。
半年多的inpatient care，两个月oncology，Q2 call (not overnight);
3个月的BMT，leukemia，病人非常多，非常重，病房是ICU配置.
Support system也有待提高，像是给refer来的病人的PMD打电话、要病例、自己病人
refill meds等事情很多事情还是要自己处理。因为忙，所以看书时间少。
Now I understand Hopkins的工作量:
Hem/Onc fellow in inpatient Hem/Onc floor = 1st year intern/4th yr med
student.
3个月的BMT! That is too much if you don't go to Hematology eventually. The
mortality of BMT (allo) is 15-20% (not from leukemia or MM). I want to say
the workload of allo BMT is >> MICU. I wish |
k*******n
发帖数: 8891 | |
yf
发帖数: 272 | 6 It's not necessary to do 3 month BMT if you final goal is not into that.
That's too much! |
c******b
发帖数: 66 | |
c******b
发帖数: 66 | |
|
d******a
发帖数: 127 | 9 Johns Hopkins but who cares? |
f****b
发帖数: 2410 | 10 感谢二丙医生细心教导，
【在 d******a 的大作中提到】
: Johns Hopkins but who cares?
|
|
|
a*********d
发帖数: 2763 | |
z**h
发帖数: 153 | 12 多谢指正。
【在 c******b 的大作中提到】
: 学校名字也拼错了...自己看看少了个什么字母?
|
z**h
发帖数: 153 | 13 真是内行看门道!佩服二饼兄。关于allo还是auto没问。还是不入门，不知道。
另外，leukemia和BMT一共三个月，可能是一个月BMT，两个月leukemia或者相反。
【在 d******a 的大作中提到】
: >> Hopkins的工作量非常大。
: 半年多的inpatient care，两个月oncology，Q2 call (not overnight);
: 3个月的BMT，leukemia，病人非常多，非常重，病房是ICU配置.
: Support system也有待提高，像是给refer来的病人的PMD打电话、要病例、自己病人
: refill meds等事情很多事情还是要自己处理。因为忙，所以看书时间少。
: Now I understand Hopkins的工作量:
: Hem/Onc fellow in inpatient Hem/Onc floor = 1st year intern/4th yr med
: student.
: 3个月的BMT! That is too much if you don't go to Hematology eventually. The
: mortality of BMT (allo) is 15-20% (not from leukemia or MM). I want to say
|
s*****e
发帖数: 404 | 14 Congrats on so many good interviews. John Hopkins has a big name. However,
they want fellows to be on academic. When I interviewed there a year ago,
the PD told us "if you want to do private practice, this is not a place for
you. We prefer single board". If you have decided to do academic after your
training, it is a great place. |
s*****e
发帖数: 404 | 15 Congrats on so many good interviews. John Hopkins has a big name. However,
they want fellows to be on academic. When I interviewed there a year ago,
the PD told us "if you want to do private practice, this is not a place for
you. We prefer single board". If you have decided to do academic after your
training, it is a great place. |
z**h
发帖数: 153 | 16 Very true! It is actually the case for almost all big names. The goal of all
top programs is to "train future leaders". The "best" program is not
necessarily the best for you.
That being said, a lot of graduates from top academic programs end up in
pratice later and actually it is easy to find job even in pratice because of
the program's reputation.
for
your
【在 s*****e 的大作中提到】
: Congrats on so many good interviews. John Hopkins has a big name. However,
: they want fellows to be on academic. When I interviewed there a year ago,
: the PD told us "if you want to do private practice, this is not a place for
: you. We prefer single board". If you have decided to do academic after your
: training, it is a great place.
|
