l*******r
发帖数: 39279 | |
o*******2
发帖数: 689 | 2 我没发现什么问题
这里很多锁男写出的英文一看就是中国人写的 |
l*******r
发帖数: 39279 | 3 我也没发现哪里不好
但是有人非说不好，所以来请教下，多少人觉得不好
【在 o*******2 的大作中提到】
: 我没发现什么问题
: 这里很多锁男写出的英文一看就是中国人写的
|
f*******y
发帖数: 1148 | 4 我个人觉得肯定高于平均wsn水平了吧，肯定比我好
但是有一点，感觉看起来没有native写的顺，个人感觉，不知道对不对
【在 l*******r 的大作中提到】
: 举手并说明
|
w********s
发帖数: 343 | |
L*****s
发帖数: 6046 | |
g****r
发帖数: 306 | 7 Big "no".
Read it again. Overall, the structure, grammar and wording are good, next to
perfection.
Something arguable in the statement is the twice uses of "never ... nor".
People may be assuming the construction works like "neither ... nor", as we
learned from our English textbook at school in our early days; however,
there's no requirement to pair "neither" with "nor" in real life day-to-day
uses of English as a language. The bottom line is, the construction of "
never ... nor" is at least acceptable to a native speaker.
【在 l*******r 的大作中提到】
: 举手并说明
|
g****r
发帖数: 306 | 8 Maybe the multiple uses of 'but' gives you the impression of being not "
excellent", and somehow it could be even better. I agree with you on this.
However, it's still excellent in overall in terms of language usages.
【在 f*******y 的大作中提到】
: 我个人觉得肯定高于平均wsn水平了吧，肯定比我好
: 但是有一点，感觉看起来没有native写的顺，个人感觉，不知道对不对
|
m******a
发帖数: 476 | |
b*******8
发帖数: 37364 | 10 没啥不好，意思明白就行了。现在就是要低调，写的太好了，反而被人说有钱请律师润
色。 |
|
|
I******a
发帖数: 3812 | 11 也就是OK吧。一个人写加一个人改，稍微高于老中平均水平也不至于吹成这个样子吧。
或者说，是翻译的还行。他这个写法就是个中译英的译法。
【在 l*******r 的大作中提到】
: 举手并说明
|
Q****r
发帖数: 7340 | 12 虽然是比20好几出来的人强，比起native就差了
也就是OK吧。一个人写加一个人改，稍微高于老中平均水平也不至于吹成这个样子吧。
或者说，是翻译的还行。他这个写法就是个中译英的译法。
★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs Lite 7.51
【在 I******a 的大作中提到】
: 也就是OK吧。一个人写加一个人改，稍微高于老中平均水平也不至于吹成这个样子吧。
: 或者说，是翻译的还行。他这个写法就是个中译英的译法。
|
g*******g
发帖数: 9753 | 13 就算他找人润色一下也没啥奇怪的吧
【在 b*******8 的大作中提到】
: 没啥不好，意思明白就行了。现在就是要低调，写的太好了，反而被人说有钱请律师润
: 色。
|
j****i
发帖数: 68152 | 14 说实话我都没看懂，很多词不认识。用google翻译了一下 |
b*******8
发帖数: 37364 | 15 娱乐八卦又会纠缠找他润色的人，越扯越多，现在就是多一事不如少一事
【在 g*******g 的大作中提到】
: 就算他找人润色一下也没啥奇怪的吧
|
G**L
发帖数: 22804 | 16 到底是好还是不好
to
we
day
【在 g****r 的大作中提到】
: Big "no".
: Read it again. Overall, the structure, grammar and wording are good, next to
: perfection.
: Something arguable in the statement is the twice uses of "never ... nor".
: People may be assuming the construction works like "neither ... nor", as we
: learned from our English textbook at school in our early days; however,
: there's no requirement to pair "neither" with "nor" in real life day-to-day
: uses of English as a language. The bottom line is, the construction of "
: never ... nor" is at least acceptable to a native speaker.
|
g****r
发帖数: 306 | 17 Are you kidding me? I am clearly saying "big No" to those who are
criticizing Guagua for his English writing.
Actions always speak louder than words. For those of you who think it is not
good or you could otherwise do a better job, take your pen, start to write
something,post it here and let us critique it. Or send the full text to a
professor or a colleague of native speaker and solicit opinion on the
statement from them.
【在 G**L 的大作中提到】
: 到底是好还是不好
:
: to
: we
: day
|
G*******n
发帖数: 6889 | 18 啧啧，给辩护的英文跟声明里的水平，彼此彼此吧。。。 |
G**L
发帖数: 22804 | 19 你第一贴里只说了"big No"，不知道是回答什么问题。
还以为你是saying big no to Guagua's english
not
write
【在 g****r 的大作中提到】
: Are you kidding me? I am clearly saying "big No" to those who are
: criticizing Guagua for his English writing.
: Actions always speak louder than words. For those of you who think it is not
: good or you could otherwise do a better job, take your pen, start to write
: something,post it here and let us critique it. Or send the full text to a
: professor or a colleague of native speaker and solicit opinion on the
: statement from them.
|
