g***j
发帖数: 40861 | |
m*******l
发帖数: 12782 | 2 家属
【在 g***j 的大作中提到】
: 有法律吗
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | |
O*******d
发帖数: 20343 | 4 Possession of a Dead Body
It is a well-established principle of law that ‘there is no property in a
corpse.’ This means that the law does not regard a corpse as property
protected by rights. In other words there can be no ‘ownership’ of a dead
body. The only exception is where body parts acquire different attributes by
virtue of the application of skill, e.g. dissection and/or preservation
techniques.
However even if there is no legal ownership certain people have the right to
possess the body. In the first place, anyone who has a duty to bury the
deceased has the right to possess the body in order to bury it. In many
cases this duty will fall upon the personal representatives of the deceased
i.e. the administrator or executor of the deceased’s estate (that is, the
deceased’s property). An executor is a person appointed under the deceased
’s will to deal with the deceased’s estate. If there is no will an
administrator will be appointed by a court for the same purpose. If there is
no executor, it is arguable that the person first entitled to a grant of
administration of the estate should be also entitled to possession of the
body in order to determine how to dispose of it. This is usually the spouse,
nearest relative or next of kin or, in the case of a child, the parents.
There are other people who might also be entitled to lawful possession of
the body as a result of their duty to dispose of the body. If the body is
lying on hospital premises, the hospital authorities will be in lawful
possession of the body. If the Coroner has jurisdiction (the power to hold
an inquest) (see below: Inquests) he or she has the right to possession of
the body for the purposes of his or her enquiries. This same authority is
sufficient to permit the pathologist, as the Coroner’s agent, to have the
legal right of possession until the Coroner’s inquiry has come to an end.
http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/rights-of-the-bereaved/ |
g***j
发帖数: 40861 | |
G***G
发帖数: 16778 | 6 his relatives.
【在 g***j 的大作中提到】
: 有法律吗
|
G***G
发帖数: 16778 | 7 the earth.
【在 g***j 的大作中提到】
: 家属不要呢
|
O*******d
发帖数: 20343 | 8 估计中国没有明确的法律管这件事。 传统上是家属拥有尸体。如果没有家属，或者家
属不要，一个尸体的归属就是模糊的。 很多去了医学院了。 |
|
O*******d
发帖数: 20343 | 9 医学院对尸体的需求永远都有。 一具尸体被解剖了，就毁坏了。需要新的尸体来补充
。 |
O*******d
发帖数: 20343 | 10 几百年前，医学解剖尸体都是犯法的。 都被认为是大逆不道。 现在大家都习惯了。
这个人体展览，跟几百年前的尸体解剖一样，习惯了就好了。 |
M*****n
发帖数: 16729 | 11 不管属谁,应该立法禁止所有利用尸体的商业行为. |
O*******d
发帖数: 20343 | 12 如果没有商业行为，就不会有尸体来源了。 美国医学院的人体骨骼标本，是从印度恒
河上的浮尸来的。 印度商人收购一具完整的浮尸只付5美元，加工好的骨骼要卖1000美
元。
【在 M*****n 的大作中提到】
: 不管属谁,应该立法禁止所有利用尸体的商业行为.
|
O*******d
发帖数: 20343 | 13 尸体加工行业应该纳入法律管理，而不是简单禁止。 |
a*******t
发帖数: 10093 | 14 尸体展览没问题
如果本人和家属愿意
【在 O*******d 的大作中提到】
: 医学院对尸体的需求永远都有。 一具尸体被解剖了，就毁坏了。需要新的尸体来补充
: 。
|
