m***8
发帖数: 204 | 1 According to the Boston Consulting Group. In China, where nearly half the
population is still rural, just under 1% of households control more than 70%
of the nation's private financial wealth.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000087239639044423310457759357
Entrepreneurs who make it big and land on well-publicized rich lists in
China are more likely to draw government scrutiny, some new research shows.
That can be costly—to the business and the entrepreneur. And while plenty
of highfliers in the business elite still easily avoid this sort of problem,
the finding highlights the troubling forces at work in China's complex, and
evolving, business culture.
The unleashing of capitalist animal spirits transformed China in a single
generation, enfranchising hundreds of millions with new economic power. It
also gave rise to widespread corruption, expanded income inequality and
deepened suspicion among the masses toward the newly rich.
Just under 1% of households globally control nearly 40% of the world's
private financial wealth, according to the Boston Consulting Group. In China
, where nearly half the population is still rural, just under 1% of
households control more than 70% of the nation's private financial wealth,
BCG estimated in 2008. Surveys of public opinion regularly place corruption
and income inequality at the top of Chinese concerns.
Two factors especially feed the problem. Chinese state-owned and affiliated
enterprises—the moneymaking machinery of the Communist Party—account for
about half of China's nonagricultural GDP. That concentration of commercial
power keeps business and markets from behaving normally. Instead, the
leaders of nonstate companies often do the logical thing: They seek out
officials to trade favors.
Enlarge Image
Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
Entrepreneurs who land on well-publicized rich lists in China are more
likely to draw government scrutiny.
Or they're connected to begin with. The Hurun Report, based in Shanghai,
tracks the nation's wealthy and calculates that there were a record 271
billionaires (in U.S. dollars) in China in 2011. A third of the top 50 and
five of the top 10 hold official political positions, the report says. "The
richer they are, the more political positions they have," it adds.
And, at times, vice versa.
"State intervention and government ownership are the causes of China's
inequality," writes Zhang Weiying, an economist at Peking University. It
encourages "official corruption and the collusion between the government and
business."
Another problem: The well-known difficulty of getting recourse through
Chinese law.
Two professors from the City University of Hong Kong and University of
California at Irvine examined decisions made by the Shanghai Courts. When a
Chinese government agency took on a farmer, individual or company, it won
100%, 92%, and 94% of the time, respectively. When a government company
tangled with an individual or company, it won 90% and 86% of the time.
"Many entrepreneurs have given up on gaining wealth from normal business
activities," writes Andy Xie, a former Morgan Stanley economist. "Instead
they rely on cultivating special relationships with government agencies or
state-owned enterprises to gain special advantages."
Public dissatisfaction "is not about who is rich, but about how one becomes
rich," he continues. "Chinese people suspect that most riches in China are
ill-gotten." | p******u
发帖数: 14642 | 2 洗煤想转移自家矛盾就只想出这挫招而已？
70%
.
problem,
and
【在 m***8 的大作中提到】
: According to the Boston Consulting Group. In China, where nearly half the
: population is still rural, just under 1% of households control more than 70%
: of the nation's private financial wealth.
: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000087239639044423310457759357
: Entrepreneurs who make it big and land on well-publicized rich lists in
: China are more likely to draw government scrutiny, some new research shows.
: That can be costly—to the business and the entrepreneur. And while plenty
: of highfliers in the business elite still easily avoid this sort of problem,
: the finding highlights the troubling forces at work in China's complex, and
: evolving, business culture.
| T*******a
发帖数: 23033 | 3
尼玛，美帝不也是这样的？
【在 m***8 的大作中提到】
: According to the Boston Consulting Group. In China, where nearly half the
: population is still rural, just under 1% of households control more than 70%
: of the nation's private financial wealth.
: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000087239639044423310457759357
: Entrepreneurs who make it big and land on well-publicized rich lists in
: China are more likely to draw government scrutiny, some new research shows.
: That can be costly—to the business and the entrepreneur. And while plenty
: of highfliers in the business elite still easily avoid this sort of problem,
: the finding highlights the troubling forces at work in China's complex, and
: evolving, business culture.
| m******e
发帖数: 2515 | 4 美国人吹牛前应该先掌握简单算术。
如果“中国1% 的家庭拥有70%的财富”，那么那1% 的家庭平均财富是其他70%家庭的平
均财富的210倍。如果其他70%家庭的平均财富是50万的话，中国1% 的家庭平均财富超
过10亿！
中国1%的家庭财富超过10亿！中国太富了？乃宇宙第一富国也！！！ | N8
发帖数: 110 | 5 美的 1%的人有99%的财富吧
70%
.
problem,
and
【在 m***8 的大作中提到】
: According to the Boston Consulting Group. In China, where nearly half the
: population is still rural, just under 1% of households control more than 70%
: of the nation's private financial wealth.
: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000087239639044423310457759357
: Entrepreneurs who make it big and land on well-publicized rich lists in
: China are more likely to draw government scrutiny, some new research shows.
: That can be costly—to the business and the entrepreneur. And while plenty
: of highfliers in the business elite still easily avoid this sort of problem,
: the finding highlights the troubling forces at work in China's complex, and
: evolving, business culture.
| H****g
发帖数: 14447 | 6 中国有2.5亿农民工，这就占到全国人口的近五分之一了。
还有几亿呆在农村的农民，所以”70%家庭平均财富50万“，显然是高估了。
【在 m******e 的大作中提到】
: 美国人吹牛前应该先掌握简单算术。
: 如果“中国1% 的家庭拥有70%的财富”，那么那1% 的家庭平均财富是其他70%家庭的平
: 均财富的210倍。如果其他70%家庭的平均财富是50万的话，中国1% 的家庭平均财富超
: 过10亿！
: 中国1%的家庭财富超过10亿！中国太富了？乃宇宙第一富国也！！！
| z*m
发帖数: 3227 | 7 文科生又出来展示逻辑性了,LOL
【在 m******e 的大作中提到】
: 美国人吹牛前应该先掌握简单算术。
: 如果“中国1% 的家庭拥有70%的财富”，那么那1% 的家庭平均财富是其他70%家庭的平
: 均财富的210倍。如果其他70%家庭的平均财富是50万的话，中国1% 的家庭平均财富超
: 过10亿！
: 中国1%的家庭财富超过10亿！中国太富了？乃宇宙第一富国也！！！
| j****n
发帖数: 7636 | 8 "其他70%家庭的平均财富是50万的话"
您能有点常识吗?
下面说的是美国
The median net worth, which is the value of assets minus debt, plunged to $
77,300 in 2010 from $126,400 in 2007.
【在 m******e 的大作中提到】
: 美国人吹牛前应该先掌握简单算术。
: 如果“中国1% 的家庭拥有70%的财富”，那么那1% 的家庭平均财富是其他70%家庭的平
: 均财富的210倍。如果其他70%家庭的平均财富是50万的话，中国1% 的家庭平均财富超
: 过10亿！
: 中国1%的家庭财富超过10亿！中国太富了？乃宇宙第一富国也！！！
| s******s
发帖数: 13035 | 9 hahaha
【在 j****n 的大作中提到】
: "其他70%家庭的平均财富是50万的话"
: 您能有点常识吗?
: 下面说的是美国
: The median net worth, which is the value of assets minus debt, plunged to $
: 77,300 in 2010 from $126,400 in 2007.
| m******e
发帖数: 2515 | 10 中国除了少数外地工作的80后，谁家没有房子？三线城市一套房子多少钱？
即使中国99%的家庭平均财富只有10万，那1%的家庭平均收入能有2.1亿，可能吗？
美国人借钱花已经成了习惯，家庭平均财富还能有$77,300? 够不错了！
【在 j****n 的大作中提到】
: "其他70%家庭的平均财富是50万的话"
: 您能有点常识吗?
: 下面说的是美国
: The median net worth, which is the value of assets minus debt, plunged to $
: 77,300 in 2010 from $126,400 in 2007.
| j****n
发帖数: 7636 | 11 跟乘法都不会算的你，我说啥好呢？你们家可能是那1%，留点神，别败光了。
【在 m******e 的大作中提到】
: 中国除了少数外地工作的80后，谁家没有房子？三线城市一套房子多少钱？
: 即使中国99%的家庭平均财富只有10万，那1%的家庭平均收入能有2.1亿，可能吗？
: 美国人借钱花已经成了习惯，家庭平均财富还能有$77,300? 够不错了！
| M*****8
发帖数: 17722 | 12
...................
我看差不多了，
尤其最近几年。
当然盗魔教徒掌控的纽约时报绝不会报告盗魔族裔的财富垄断。
就像大学入学里盗魔族裔比例最高，但故意提亚裔来转移焦点。
当然，国内的贫富悬殊太厉害了，早该调整，并且非常容易做。
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Military/38257933.html
【在 N8 的大作中提到】
: 美的 1%的人有99%的财富吧
:
: 70%
: .
: problem,
: and
| j******h
发帖数: 3904 | 13 美国不一样么
可能还更严重
怎不见这些寡头养的媒体吭声？ | L*******r
发帖数: 8961 | 14 这个和CEO们把银行搞倒闭拿天额奖金有什么关系？ |
|
