b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 1 http://www.shtfplan.com/ron-paul/ron-pauls-farewell-to-congress
The Proliferation of Federal Crimes
The Constitution established four federal crimes. Today the experts can’t
even agree on how many federal crimes are now on the books – they number
into the thousands. No one person can comprehend the enormity of the legal
system – especially the tax code. Due to the ill-advised drug war and the
endless federal expansion of the criminal code we have over 6 million people
under correctional suspension, more than the Soviets ever had, and more
than any other nation today, including China. I don’t understand the
complacency of the Congress and the willingness to continue their obsession
with passing more Federal laws. Mandatory sentencing laws associated with
drug laws have compounded our prison problems.
The federal register is now 75,000 pages long and the tax code has 72,000
pages, and expands every year. When will the people start shouting, “enough
is enough,” and demand Congress cease and desist. | b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 2 comments:
"Ron Paul was our last vestige of a glimmer of any hope whatsoever.
A true statesman indeed.
We are now well into a morass of vile corrupt self serving plutocrats who
WILL finalize the final death blow to this nation..as it is well underway.
The Constitution and Bill of Rights are mere pieces of paper to these
scumbags left in the rat infested hellhole of D.C…and all are beholden to
their masters on Wall Street and moreover the spider nest itself the Federal
Reserve..
All of them,and surely nearly a one paid heed to his departure nor
congratulated him on his service..
Lock and load..prepare.. and prep like never before..
" | b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 3 "Years from now people will look back (post shtf) and revere Paul as a
prophet" | b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 4 "Good man.
A pity that the Parliament of Whores that he was speaking to will never
listen to his words…
Ah, well – so goeth the Republic, methinks. Good to have you there as long
as you were, Mr. Paul.
" | b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 5 "Two hundred years from now, after the fall of the United States, historians
will write "they should have listened to Ron Paul."
The same will not be said of Karl Rove, Mitt Romney, etc. " | b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 6 "I found in the debates I agreed wholeheartedly with Paul about 80% of the
time. Even on a portion of his foreign policy, more often then not. Then,
when he hit the other 20%, he went way off the reservation.
If the Republicans were not such arrogant bast@rds, they would have welcomed
this wing into the race and given Paul fans a few items to be excited about
in reduction of government. Arrogance really seems to be the strongest
trait among beltway RNC insiders.
" | b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 7 "If Romney gave speeches .00005% as real as this he would have won." | a**********y
发帖数: 2367 | 8 惨
最后的斗士，老去了
他的发言实在是老人的无奈，沮丧和抱怨
下面连掌声都没有
其实他的观点是从70年代起就是这么consistent
一点一点印证，还是没人信他 | b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 9 his questions
Questions
Excessive government has created such a mess it prompts many questions:
■Why are sick people who use medical marijuana put in prison?
■Why does the federal government restrict the drinking of raw milk?
■Why can’t Americans manufacturer rope and other products from hemp?
■Why are Americans not allowed to use gold and silver as legal tender as
mandated by the Constitution?
■Why is Germany concerned enough to consider repatriating their gold held
by the FED for her in New York? Is it that the trust in the U.S. and dollar
supremacy beginning to wane?
■Why do our political leaders believe it’s unnecessary to thoroughly
audit our own gold?
■Why can’t Americans decide which type of light bulbs they can buy?
■Why is the TSA permitted to abuse the rights of any American traveling by
air?
■Why should there be mandatory sentences – even up to life for crimes
without victims – as our drug laws require?
■Why have we allowed the federal government to regulate commodes in our
homes?
■Why is it political suicide for anyone to criticize AIPAC ?
■Why haven’t we given up on the drug war since it’s an obvious failure
and violates the people’s rights? Has nobody noticed that the authorities
can’t even keep drugs out of the prisons? How can making our entire society
a prison solve the problem?
■Why do we sacrifice so much getting needlessly involved in border
disputes and civil strife around the world and ignore the root cause of the
most deadly border in the world-the one between Mexico and the US?
■Why does Congress willingly give up its prerogatives to the Executive
Branch?
■Why does changing the party in power never change policy? Could it be
that the views of both parties are essentially the same?
■Why did the big banks, the large corporations, and foreign banks and
foreign central banks get bailed out in 2008 and the middle class lost their
jobs and their homes?
■Why do so many in the government and the federal officials believe that
creating money out of thin air creates wealth?
■Why do so many accept the deeply flawed principle that government
bureaucrats and politicians can protect us from ourselves without totally
destroying the principle of liberty?
■Why can’t people understand that war always destroys wealth and liberty?
■Why is there so little concern for the Executive Order that gives the
President authority to establish a “kill list,” including American
citizens, of those targeted for assassination?
■Why is patriotism thought to be blind loyalty to the government and the
politicians who run it, rather than loyalty to the principles of liberty and
support for the people? Real patriotism is a willingness to challenge the
government when it’s wrong.
■Why is it is claimed that if people won’t or can’t take care of their
own needs, that people in government can do it for them?
■Why did we ever give the government a safe haven for initiating violence
against the people?
■Why do some members defend free markets, but not civil liberties?
■Why do some members defend civil liberties but not free markets? Aren’t
they the same?
■Why don’t more defend both economic liberty and personal liberty?
■Why are there not more individuals who seek to intellectually influence
others to bring about positive changes than those who seek power to force
others to obey their commands?
■Why does the use of religion to support a social gospel and preemptive
wars, both of which requires authoritarians to use violence, or the threat
of violence, go unchallenged? Aggression and forced redistribution of wealth
has nothing to do with the teachings of the world great religions.
■Why do we allow the government and the Federal Reserve to disseminate
false information dealing with both economic and foreign policy?
■Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the
minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority?
■Why should anyone be surprised that Congress has no credibility, since
there’s such a disconnect between what politicians say and what they do?
■Is there any explanation for all the deception, the unhappiness, the fear
of the future, the loss of confidence in our leaders, the distrust, the
anger and frustration? Yes there is, and there’s a way to reverse these
attitudes. The negative perceptions are logical and a consequence of bad
policies bringing about our problems. Identification of the problems and
recognizing the cause allow the proper changes to come easy.
【在 a**********y 的大作中提到】
: 惨
: 最后的斗士，老去了
: 他的发言实在是老人的无奈，沮丧和抱怨
: 下面连掌声都没有
: 其实他的观点是从70年代起就是这么consistent
: 一点一点印证，还是没人信他
| f*******l
发帖数: 828 | | I******a
发帖数: 3812 | 11 米国政界少有的正常人。致敬。
people
【在 b********n 的大作中提到】
: http://www.shtfplan.com/ron-paul/ron-pauls-farewell-to-congress
: The Proliferation of Federal Crimes
: The Constitution established four federal crimes. Today the experts can’t
: even agree on how many federal crimes are now on the books – they number
: into the thousands. No one person can comprehend the enormity of the legal
: system – especially the tax code. Due to the ill-advised drug war and the
: endless federal expansion of the criminal code we have over 6 million people
: under correctional suspension, more than the Soviets ever had, and more
: than any other nation today, including China. I don’t understand the
: complacency of the Congress and the willingness to continue their obsession
|
|
