m********5
发帖数: 17667 | 1 中国对iphone的附加值贡献几乎可以忽略，从iphone获得的利润也几乎可以忽略。
China Makes Almost Nothing Out of Apple's iPads and iPhones
As you can see the two largest inputs are materials and Apple’s own profit
margin. Despite the machine being assembled in China it’s still true that
the value of that labour is trivial: 2% or so of the cost of the machine.
Here the amount that goes to Apple’s profits is even higher and China’s
labour input about the same.
The reason the profits are so much higher is really a measurement issue: the
iPhone tends to be sold through the networks, thus the sales costs are
somewhere in the networks’ accounts, not here.
If you like, the end lesson here is that you can have lots of manufacturing
jobs, sure, as Foxconn does, but they pay $400 a month maybe. And you can
have high paying manufacturing jobs like at that Samsung plant in Texas, but
you’re not going to get very many of them.
If you want lots of jobs and lots of high paying jobs then you’re not going
to find them in manufacturing. They’re where the money is, in the design,
the software and the retailing of the products, not the physical making of
them. Manufacturing is just so, you know, 20 th century.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2011/12/24/china-makes-
2011年的观点，不知道现在如何？ | m********5
发帖数: 17667 | 2 这个有一定道理，如果零件，所有材料都是在大陆采购，那么这些所谓material cost
有多少利润确实值得研究一下，但总量也不会超过iphone价格的 31%
何况，按照我的经验这种零件利润如果是批发价的10%左右已经算暴利，能达到30%的是
少之又少。因此，即便是平均30%利润，最后物料供应商也只占iphone总价的6%.
发信人: attain79 (蒙古国海军司令), 信区: Military
标 题: Re: 小将们用的是什么手机？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 26 15:49:10 2014, 美东)
你给我这一堆垃圾新闻有什么用？几个连工厂长什么样都不知道的美国文科生拍脑袋出
来的垃圾blog文章，没有任何信息量。
究竟苹果的零部件供应商都是谁，哪个零件是哪个厂商，各个厂商利润率是多少？一级
和二级供应商里中国厂商究竟有哪些？你和这些报道的作者除了认识一个富士康之外，
说得出半个字么？
不用我在这忽悠，你不信就自己去搜iphone的电池模、触摸屏、发声单元、mems
microphone、电芯、天线……反正你就把你的iphone拆开了看，部件上打的供应商标签
都是些啥，上面白纸黑字的到处有。
当然 劝你还是不要搜 太悲愤了 折寿的
profit
the
【在 m********5 的大作中提到】
: 中国对iphone的附加值贡献几乎可以忽略，从iphone获得的利润也几乎可以忽略。
: China Makes Almost Nothing Out of Apple's iPads and iPhones
: As you can see the two largest inputs are materials and Apple’s own profit
: margin. Despite the machine being assembled in China it’s still true that
: the value of that labour is trivial: 2% or so of the cost of the machine.
: Here the amount that goes to Apple’s profits is even higher and China’s
: labour input about the same.
: The reason the profits are so much higher is really a measurement issue: the
: iPhone tends to be sold through the networks, thus the sales costs are
: somewhere in the networks’ accounts, not here.
| l*****o
发帖数: 9235 | 3 呆弯和日本也很少啊，倒是南朝鲜比较多。
组装厂提供就业，对于没有任何一技之长的年轻人，不是唯一选择？ | s*x
发帖数: 8041 | | h*******u
发帖数: 15326 | 5 别说零件利润了，如果彻底从原料到成品完全中国生产，那么对于中国是100%利润.
所以你算的这个6%扯淡
cost
【在 m********5 的大作中提到】
: 这个有一定道理，如果零件，所有材料都是在大陆采购，那么这些所谓material cost
: 有多少利润确实值得研究一下，但总量也不会超过iphone价格的 31%
: 何况，按照我的经验这种零件利润如果是批发价的10%左右已经算暴利，能达到30%的是
: 少之又少。因此，即便是平均30%利润，最后物料供应商也只占iphone总价的6%.
: 发信人: attain79 (蒙古国海军司令), 信区: Military
: 标 题: Re: 小将们用的是什么手机？
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 26 15:49:10 2014, 美东)
: 你给我这一堆垃圾新闻有什么用？几个连工厂长什么样都不知道的美国文科生拍脑袋出
: 来的垃圾blog文章，没有任何信息量。
: 究竟苹果的零部件供应商都是谁，哪个零件是哪个厂商，各个厂商利润率是多少？一级
| Y******d
发帖数: 1938 | 6 apple肯定大头，你个帮人打工的还想拿大头
【在 h*******u 的大作中提到】
: 别说零件利润了，如果彻底从原料到成品完全中国生产，那么对于中国是100%利润.
: 所以你算的这个6%扯淡
:
: cost
| d****n
发帖数: 2276 | 7 这个 我信，
咱们换 华为吧
profit
the
【在 m********5 的大作中提到】
: 中国对iphone的附加值贡献几乎可以忽略，从iphone获得的利润也几乎可以忽略。
: China Makes Almost Nothing Out of Apple's iPads and iPhones
: As you can see the two largest inputs are materials and Apple’s own profit
: margin. Despite the machine being assembled in China it’s still true that
: the value of that labour is trivial: 2% or so of the cost of the machine.
: Here the amount that goes to Apple’s profits is even higher and China’s
: labour input about the same.
: The reason the profits are so much higher is really a measurement issue: the
: iPhone tends to be sold through the networks, thus the sales costs are
: somewhere in the networks’ accounts, not here.
| t****x
发帖数: 9441 | 8 没有替爱疯打工，哪有今天的华为和小米。老美就继续自我感觉良好醉生梦死吧， |
|
