由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Military版 - Princeton Study: U.S. No Longer An Actual Democracy
相关主题
藤校打老将脸了: 美国政治制度是寡头政治,不是民主政治今天和一个老美聊美国选举,他极端失望
当精英向美国开战,这是他们的做法每次叔听老将说美国是民主国家,叔就想笑
最新研究显示美国选民对政策的影响力近乎零经济学人宣布: 美国已不再是完全民主国家
加拿大将与印度开始自由贸易谈判给华尔街吸血鬼打工的老中们,醒醒吧
凡是说“中式民主” 的都是五毛你站哪一方?
美国的开国先驱论民主英国贵族已经被同化了
虽然台湾民主很可笑,但台湾的民主确实是一人一票中國現象: 不貪不是個好東西
民主大师:现在民主背运呀根据普林市顿,美帝真正的制度是
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: democracy话题: princeton话题: study话题: longer话题: actual
进入Military版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
z**k
发帖数: 945
1
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/princeton-experts-say-us-
A new study from Princeton spells bad news for American democracy—namely,
that it no longer exists.
Asking "[w]ho really rules?" researchers Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page
argue that over the past few decades America's political system has slowly
transformed from a democracy into an oligarchy, where wealthy elites wield
most power.
Using data drawn from over 1,800 different policy initiatives from 1981 to
2002, the two conclude that rich, well-connected individuals on the
political scene now steer the direction of the country, regardless of or
even against the will of the majority of voters.
TPM Interview: Scholar Behind Viral 'Oligarchy' Study Tells You What It
Means
"The central point that emerges from our research is that economic elites
and organized groups representing business interests have substantial
independent impacts on U.S. government policy," they write, "while mass-
based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent
influence."
As one illustration, Gilens and Page compare the political preferences of
Americans at the 50th income percentile to preferences of Americans at the
90th percentile as well as major lobbying or business groups. They find that
the government—whether Republican or Democratic—more often follows the
preferences of the latter group rather than the first.
The researches note that this is not a new development caused by, say,
recent Supreme Court decisions allowing more money in politics, such as
Citizens United or this month's ruling on McCutcheon v. FEC. As the data
stretching back to the 1980s suggests, this has been a long term trend, and
is therefore harder for most people to perceive, let alone reverse.
"Ordinary citizens," they write, "might often be observed to 'win' (that is,
to get their preferred policy outcomes) even if they had no independent
effect whatsoever on policy making, if elites (with whom they often agree)
actually prevail."
1 (共1页)
进入Military版参与讨论
相关主题
根据普林市顿,美帝真正的制度是凡是说“中式民主” 的都是五毛
共党必须直面资本的挑战美国的开国先驱论民主
住美国城市不好的地方就是满街都是乞丐和无家可归的人虽然台湾民主很可笑,但台湾的民主确实是一人一票
老将不用再舔了,我帝前总统都说美国是寡头统治和政治贿赂民主大师:现在民主背运呀
藤校打老将脸了: 美国政治制度是寡头政治,不是民主政治今天和一个老美聊美国选举,他极端失望
当精英向美国开战,这是他们的做法每次叔听老将说美国是民主国家,叔就想笑
最新研究显示美国选民对政策的影响力近乎零经济学人宣布: 美国已不再是完全民主国家
加拿大将与印度开始自由贸易谈判给华尔街吸血鬼打工的老中们,醒醒吧
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: democracy话题: princeton话题: study话题: longer话题: actual