g**********1
发帖数: 1 | 1 法官判决，哈佛参与本科录取的教师必须接受敏感培训以消除对小黄人的偏见，真正做
到政治正确。但使用种族作为录取因素之一本身不宪，不能因为哈佛的几个不良白皮歧
视小黄人就说整个制度违宪。case closed。 |
Y***i
发帖数: 1932 | |
b*******t
发帖数: 4756 | 3 赞！
我是黄泥，你们也都得是黄泥！你妈逼的黄疮不想当黄泥？休想！ |
z********0
发帖数: 1 | |
T*********s
发帖数: 20444 | 5 黄床有没有做成过一件事情?
除了辱骂其它小黄人很在行以外 |
h****e
发帖数: 1 | 6 租飞机支持特朗普。。。。。。
: 黄床有没有做成过一件事情?
: 除了辱骂其它小黄人很在行以外
【在 T*********s 的大作中提到】
: 黄床有没有做成过一件事情?
: 除了辱骂其它小黄人很在行以外
|
x******g
发帖数: 33885 | 7 属实
尼玛都想挤进哈佛，就是为了能在亲戚朋友前吹牛。
纯傻逼
【在 Y***i 的大作中提到】
: 黄疮都是傻逼。
: 这是不容争议的事实。
|
g**********1
发帖数: 1 | |
a*****y
发帖数: 33185 | 9 说实话，本科进不来哈佛，还可以可以博士或者博士后进嘛，实在不行花钱去哈佛读个
MBA |
g**********1
发帖数: 1 | 10 看了一下这个案子，越看越觉得黄疮傻逼。
其实如果只是告哈佛录取存在歧视和不公平，要求赔钱，胜诉的机会还是有的。但这帮
傻逼被一个白皮犹右逼当枪屎，非要诉哈佛用AA违宪，傻逼了。 |
|
|
f******d
发帖数: 2394 | 11 你把小将绕糊涂了。到底黄皮疮是反美的还是汉奸？
: 看了一下这个案子，越看越觉得黄疮傻逼。
: 其实如果只是告哈佛录取存在歧视和不公平，要求赔钱，胜诉的机会还是有的。
但这帮
: 傻逼被一个白皮犹右逼当枪屎，非要诉哈佛用AA违宪，傻逼了。
【在 g**********1 的大作中提到】
: 看了一下这个案子，越看越觉得黄疮傻逼。
: 其实如果只是告哈佛录取存在歧视和不公平，要求赔钱，胜诉的机会还是有的。但这帮
: 傻逼被一个白皮犹右逼当枪屎，非要诉哈佛用AA违宪，傻逼了。
|
W*****B
发帖数: 4796 | 12 这个判决的正负票数各多少，都是谁投的
【在 g**********1 的大作中提到】
: 法官判决，哈佛参与本科录取的教师必须接受敏感培训以消除对小黄人的偏见，真正做
: 到政治正确。但使用种族作为录取因素之一本身不宪，不能因为哈佛的几个不良白皮歧
: 视小黄人就说整个制度违宪。case closed。
|
b*****e
发帖数: 53215 | 13 不投票 白牛一言堂 白牛峰感激涕零
【在 W*****B 的大作中提到】
: 这个判决的正负票数各多少，都是谁投的
|
W*****B
发帖数: 4796 | 14 原来是联邦法庭，还没到高院
U.S.
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
Federal judge finds university doesn’t intentionally discriminate based on
race in admissions
Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t
intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal
judge ruled, a victory for the university that is expected to be appealed as
high as the Supreme Court.
In a 130-page ruling on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs found
that Harvard’s practices were “not perfect” and could use improvements,
including bias training for admissions officers, but “the Court will not
dismantle a very fine admissions program that passes constitutional muster,
solely because it could do better.”
The school’s admissions process is in line with Supreme Court precedents
and doesn’t violate federal civil rights law, the judge found.
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of
trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses
defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a
penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard
than applicants of other races.
The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair
Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and
limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group
is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a
similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme
Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill.
Write to Melissa Korn at [email protected]
【在 W*****B 的大作中提到】
: 这个判决的正负票数各多少，都是谁投的
|
g**********1
发帖数: 1 | 15 到高院也没戏。布鲁闷骚已经去过好几次了，全部铩羽而还，应该有20年了吧。 这个
傻逼钱多，吃饱了撑的咬AA为生，黄疮拿自己的生命跟着一起耗。哈哈。
on
as
found
【在 W*****B 的大作中提到】
: 原来是联邦法庭，还没到高院
: U.S.
: Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
: Federal judge finds university doesn’t intentionally discriminate based on
: race in admissions
: Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t
: intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal
: judge ruled, a victory for the university that is expected to be appealed as
: high as the Supreme Court.
: In a 130-page ruling on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs found
|
