j****a
发帖数: 1 | 1 【1】关于绝对人权的认识误区
很多人误认为，人权是一个绝对观念，人人都具有绝对人权。一个人的自由神圣不可侵
犯。一个人的人权也是神圣不可侵犯。所以，人权绝对人人平等。
特别是在民主国家 每一个人的人权是绝对平等的。 无论什么人，无论肤色，族裔，性
别，罪犯，纵火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子的人权也是绝对平等。
在现代文明国家中，侵犯人权的只有国家机器，警察和军队。 而只有罪犯，劫匪，纵
火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子的人权保障的国家。
人人无论肤色，族裔，性别的人权，就自然而然得到保障。
有这种认知的人认为，罪犯，纵火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子是西方文明国家的最底层（黑
人也是），只要罪犯，纵火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子（黑人）的人权得到保障，黑命贵以
后，所有人的命就贵。人人的人权就得到了保障。
【2】公民的权利不来源于“政府”。 认为公民权利来源于政府？有这种认知的人是大
错特错！首先，我们每一个人的人权不是来源于“政府”。在民主宪政国家 任何一个
公民的人权与自由来源于在宪法和国家法律框架中，得到规范和保障。
如果没有在宪法和国家法律框架中被规范和保障的权利，任何人就可能没有自由，谁都
可以被“政府”或者“他人”任意践踏和侵犯。社会就会无序，就会是丛林法则的弱肉
强食。
与专制独裁的王权根本不同。在专制社会的王权中，每一个人的人权来源于“恩赐”。
公民的权力与政府的权力是根本对立的。
在民主宪政国家，完全不同！我们公民社会中， 人权被侵犯，受到威胁来源于两个方
面，一个是没有受到监督的政权。另外一个方面，是来源于其他违法乱纪，为非作歹的
罪犯，劫匪，强奸犯，杀人犯，纵火犯。所以，每一个人公民的自由与人权的威胁不一
定是来源于“政府”。很可大可能性是为非作歹的罪犯，劫匪。
所以， 在这种情况下， 每一个公民的人权与侵犯公民自由的为非作歹的罪犯，劫匪的
“人权”是根本对立的。 而不是说，首先要保障了罪犯，纵火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子
的人权，遵纪守法公民的人权就自然而然有保障了。
事情没有那么简单!
所以，这一个认识误区一定要改变。在民主宪政国家，只有政府遵纪守法，每一个公民
也都遵纪守法，在这样的宪法和国家法律框架中，公民人权与自由得到规范和保障。
违法乱纪，为非作歹的罪犯，劫匪，与违法乱纪为非作歹的政府一样危害遵纪守法公民
的人权与自由。
【3】所以，结论是根本不是保障了罪犯，纵火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子的人权，遵纪守
法公民的人权就自然而然有保障了。不是先黑命贵，然后其他人自然而然就命贵了。罪
犯，纵火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子，非法移民权利得到保障，遵纪守法公民的人权就自然
而然有就保障了。不是！！！不一定！！
一定要看清楚谁在违法乱纪？ 是罪犯，纵火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子，非法移民？
还是政府？无论是谁违法乱纪，为非作歹，都事实上侵犯和威胁了遵纪守法公民的自由
与人权。
【4】美国大法官金斯伯格是女权卫道士吗？从表面来看，早期她确实为“妇女”在社
会中的平等权利做了一些努力。如果她一生“单纯”仅仅是为了保护“妇女”和“儿童
”的权益？她为什么在晚年不遗余力地推动有利于“恋童癖”，“强奸犯”的权益，而
不是保护“妇女”和“儿童”的权益呢？例如：众所周知，儿童在16岁以前性发育并没
有完全成熟。特别是16岁以下（同意性交年龄12岁）的少女，要承担妊娠，产褥，哺乳
，教育婴孩的家庭责任为时过早。不利于少女生理，心理，学习与事业的进取与成长（
特别是现代文明社会，需要青少年更多的学习知识与技能，未来成功走向社会）。
为什么在做这一件事请与她关心“妇女”“儿童”权益的追求“南辕北辙”呢？
答案只有一个“她一生追求关心与提升“妇女”“儿童”权益是“虚假”的！？
她一生通过“同性恋”，“毒品合法”“男女共厕共浴”难道不是为了满足“强奸犯”
，“恋童癖”“偷窥欲”，毒犯的立场上？保障罪犯的人权，而侵犯遵纪守法公民的人
权为目的。
她为了那些人而立法呢？ 答案如下：（为的是美国达官贵人，地位显赫，有权有势有
钱的人为非作歹，违法乱纪）
例如：拜登， 拜登儿子，奥巴马，克林顿， 爱泼斯坦，他们的人权！! 为他们强奸幼
女，同性恋少年，随意吸食毒品而立法！因为，她们长期以来狼狈为奸，蛇鼠一窝。如
果，金斯伯格的所有立法都成功。拜登，克林顿，爱泼斯坦还有罪吗？没有！他们还需
要神神秘秘，偷偷摸摸的地下俱乐部吗？不需要了，公开化，堂而皇之的登堂入室。因
为已经无罪化了！他们今天为什么如此抗拒，恐惧失去权力？因为金斯伯格的立法并没
有完成。他们恐惧罪行被暴露，被揭发，被调查的那一天。
所以，他们惶惶不可终日，只有民主党的“权力”才能够让他们“脱罪”，成功“立法
”合法化，让他们就没有“负罪感”！他们想象力很丰富，很天真！因为，天网恢恢疏
而不漏，就是民主党立法？造物主的末日审判这些人也难辞其咎。如果是早一天悔改，
很可能才是最佳出路。简单地说，你今天能够逃脱共和党与川普这一关，也逃脱不了上
帝那一关。
【5】他们所谓“黑命贵”是“黑人罪犯的命贵”，而不是黑人警察的命贵，也不是居
住在黑人社区的黑人命贵。他们要保护的“弱势群体”是“弱势中的违法乱纪群体”，
因为他们是“统一战线”“同病相怜”。但是，他们不好“直白”的说，只能够把所有
“黑人”“弱势群体”都包括进来。这样就名正言顺，政治正确了。
同意性交年龄12岁（毒品合法化）有利于青少年，少女生理，心理，学习与事业的进取
与成长（需要青少年更多的学习知识与技能，未来成功走向社会），在斯伯格的视野中
？是他们考虑的因数吗？我根本看不出来。
本站合作媒体： abc94536 留园网 | m*******n
发帖数: 4186 | 2 屬實
【在 j****a 的大作中提到】
: 【1】关于绝对人权的认识误区
: 很多人误认为，人权是一个绝对观念，人人都具有绝对人权。一个人的自由神圣不可侵
: 犯。一个人的人权也是神圣不可侵犯。所以，人权绝对人人平等。
: 特别是在民主国家 每一个人的人权是绝对平等的。 无论什么人，无论肤色，族裔，性
: 别，罪犯，纵火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子的人权也是绝对平等。
: 在现代文明国家中，侵犯人权的只有国家机器，警察和军队。 而只有罪犯，劫匪，纵
: 火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子的人权保障的国家。
: 人人无论肤色，族裔，性别的人权，就自然而然得到保障。
: 有这种认知的人认为，罪犯，纵火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子是西方文明国家的最底层（黑
: 人也是），只要罪犯，纵火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子（黑人）的人权得到保障，黑命贵以
| D**********N
发帖数: 290 | 3 最近看了留园不少挺川文章，都有一样的偏执问题。
“答案只有一个“她一生追求关心与提升“妇女”“儿童”权益是“虚假”的！？
她一生通过“同性恋”，“毒品合法”“男女共厕共浴”难道不是为了满足“强奸犯”
，“恋童癖”“偷窥欲”，毒犯的立场上？保障罪犯的人权，而侵犯遵纪守法公民的人
权为目的。”
精神健康很重要。 | p*******k
发帖数: 488 | 4 说得没错！一个政治投机分子而已，背后的犹太势力推上去代表犹太人利益的。
看多了这些虚伪的投机分子阴私，对各种高大上的玩意一概嗤之以鼻！
记得印度那个得诺贝尔奖的修女特蕾莎么？也是说得圣母无比，后来一个印度医生揭穿
了背后一切谎言：修女拼命到处收集慈善捐款后进贡给梵蒂冈的娈童癖。她所谓的穷人
医院，完全都是骗人的，那些医院里甚至都没有合格的医生！ | l*******g
发帖数: 27064 | 5 到底谁偏执？
麻痹的坚持事实和正义叫偏执？
你们左叉的垃圾一心一意，毫无顾忌的搞些全他妈的毫无逻辑和常识的玩意，反而不叫
偏执？
【在 D**********N 的大作中提到】
: 最近看了留园不少挺川文章，都有一样的偏执问题。
: “答案只有一个“她一生追求关心与提升“妇女”“儿童”权益是“虚假”的！？
: 她一生通过“同性恋”，“毒品合法”“男女共厕共浴”难道不是为了满足“强奸犯”
: ，“恋童癖”“偷窥欲”，毒犯的立场上？保障罪犯的人权，而侵犯遵纪守法公民的人
: 权为目的。”
: 精神健康很重要。
| t**i
发帖数: 511 | 6 偏执的一塌糊涂， 你自己看看Ginsburg的简历
【在 l*******g 的大作中提到】
: 到底谁偏执？
: 麻痹的坚持事实和正义叫偏执？
: 你们左叉的垃圾一心一意，毫无顾忌的搞些全他妈的毫无逻辑和常识的玩意，反而不叫
: 偏执？
| t**i
发帖数: 511 | 7 I graduated high school in 1965. Abortion was outlawed then, of course. But
even though birth control pills were starting to become available, only
married women could get them, and only with written permission from their
husbands. Many doctors refused to prescribe them. Taking them was a moral
offense that would get you excommunicated from most religions. Many
pharmacists would not fill the prescription. And when they did, whispers
went around the drug store, and the pharmacist and the clerks would treat
you with contempt. It was a big freaking intimidating deal.
If a girl or woman got groped or raped, she usually kept it to herself. She
would be blamed, always, for wearing the wrong thing, being in the wrong
place, and acting the wrong way. Always.
Even if she was a minor, and the offender was an older relative. Men were
praised for being sexual. Women were shamed. Even married women could expect
leers and slurs about her condition if she was pregnant. That's why
maternity wear was so concealing and prudish then. It was considered
disgusting for a very pregnant woman to be out in public. In most jobs women
quit immediately when they found out they were pregnant. Or they would be
fired. And there would be no unemployment benefits.
Women had to take the oath in the marriage service that she would "love,
honor, and Obey". It was even in secular marriages by Justices of the Peace.
It was taken for granted. Women had the relationship to her husband that a
child had to his mother. Subordinate. Obedient. There were laws, but "
slapping around" or spanking a wife who "got out of line", "forgot her place
", and "tried to wear the pants in the family", was actually regarded as
appropriate by most people. And even when a wife was beaten to the point of
needing hospitalization, usually, her husband was merely warned by police to
"take it easy on her", and it was the wife who faced interrogation by her
clergy, the police, and the hospital about what SHE did to "set him off",
and was counseled to change her attitude. She was NEVER to deny a husband
his conjugal rights to her body.
Because women could not control pregnancy, even by choosing to abstain, she
had no control of her life. The fact that her employment depended on it,
meant that no financial institution could take a chance on her being to
repay loans. She could not get credit, buy a house or a car, or take out a
student loan, unless her husband or her father, somebody legally "
responsible" for her, co-signed the loan.
Because she could not control pregnancy, she was denied most jobs in
management or training. Companies did not want to invest in temporary
employees. They did not want to have to rebuild organizations when key
people left.
Colleges denied most applications from female high school graduates. The
attitude was that girls were only there to find a husband, and that they
would drop out when they married and had babies. (And girls and women who
became pregnant out of wedlock were expelled from high school and college
immediately). Colleges felt that every time they accepted a female, she was
taking the place of a future male breadwinner. It was considered almost
immoral in their eyes.
Besides, "everyone knew" that women were not as smart as men, anyway. The
silly things had no common sense. They needed to be guided and protected.
They were the weaker sex, both physically and mentally. Television and
movies made constant fun of them, especially of women who were clever and
tried to rise to the level of men, and do their jobs. Those who succeeded
were called horrible names, and came to bad ends. Unless, of course, a man
came along to put her back in her place and she smiled and went happily back
to it. Ah, true love!
Because of all that, her temporary availability, her subordinate status. it
was simply unthinkable to see women in positions of authority. Women in the
police and the military wore skirts and heels and did not carry weapons, and
mostly did secretarial work, or support work as drivers, communication
messengers, crossing guards, etc. Women did not appear on media as experts,
or host the nightly news. In business, women did not appear in the board
room, except as secretaries, serving coffee, passing out papers, and getting
touched inappropriately. "Working girls" were fair game.
Look at old video and you do not see any women in orchestras, except as the
singer, or on any film crews except as the script girl, or on any newscasts
except as the weather girl, in a perky revealing outfit to reflect the
weather of the day.
This was the world I grew up in. Where little girls were admonished to
pretend to be weak and clumsy and stupid so the boys would feel big and
strong. So they would LIKE us. So that someday, one of them would choose us,
and marry us.
Our only goal in life was to be a housewife and mother, after a temporary
stint as a nurse, teacher, telephone operator, store clerk, waitress or
secretary. We were discouraged from "racy" choices like airline stewardess,
model, actress or musician, because people would get the "wrong idea" about
us. (A girl who became a cocktail waitress or nightclub singer might as well
just put a scarlet A on her chest.)
So when Ruth Bader Ginsburg graduated high school in 1951 and was accepted
at Cornell University, that was a big deal. When she got accepted at Harvard
University after marrying and becoming a mother, that was a HUGE deal. When
she graduated TOP of her class at Columbia Law School, that was nothing
less than astounding. And THEN, she became a PROFESSOR at Rutgers Law School
in 1963 (where she was told she would be paid less because her husband had
a good paying job). She was one of only 20 female law professors in the
entire country.
She was also a volunteer attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union. In
1972, Ginsburg co-founded the Women's Rights Project at the ACLU, and
participated in more than 300 gender discrimination cases, and argued six
gender discrimination cases before the Supreme Court between 1973 and 1976,
winning five of them. She joined the ACLU board of directors and in 1980,
President Jimmy Carter appointed her to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit, where she served until her appointment to the
Supreme Court by President Bill Clinton in 1993.
In the 54 years since I graduated high school, the social role, the
opportunities, and the rights of women changed, thanks to Ruth Bader
Ginsburg, and other pioneers like her, from basically that of a child to
that of an adult human being. We have almost gained equality to men in
business and so many other fields. We still have a ways to go to be equal in
pay. (And of course, women of color still are kept back at a much lower
level than white women). We have only a tenuous hold on control of our own
bodies. The same men who claim a mask is a violation of their civil rights
to govern their own bodies, have no problem claiming the right to decide
every aspect of ours.
The primary goal of McConnell and Trump, and the religious organizations
that back them, is to overturn Roe v Wade, and LGBTQ rights, and then every
advancement we have made in Civil Rights, Women's Rights, and Voting Rights
in the Courts. They want to roll back the clock and re-establish white
supremacy and religious authority to where they were in my day. In Ruth
Bader Ginsburg's day.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg showed us that anything is possible if we are willing to
put the will, the time, the effort, and the work into it. This tiny woman
overcame every obstacle and achieved something for ALL of us living in this
country today. We ALL need to step up now, and carry her torch forward. We
stood on giant's shoulders. We must not fail her. We will not fall, but
climb higher, to the place she led us to, the place she wanted us to go.
VOTE. Get everyone you know to vote. Everything we ever fought for and won,
is on the line.
From the class of 65.
【在 j****a 的大作中提到】
: 【1】关于绝对人权的认识误区
: 很多人误认为，人权是一个绝对观念，人人都具有绝对人权。一个人的自由神圣不可侵
: 犯。一个人的人权也是神圣不可侵犯。所以，人权绝对人人平等。
: 特别是在民主国家 每一个人的人权是绝对平等的。 无论什么人，无论肤色，族裔，性
: 别，罪犯，纵火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子的人权也是绝对平等。
: 在现代文明国家中，侵犯人权的只有国家机器，警察和军队。 而只有罪犯，劫匪，纵
: 火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子的人权保障的国家。
: 人人无论肤色，族裔，性别的人权，就自然而然得到保障。
: 有这种认知的人认为，罪犯，纵火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子是西方文明国家的最底层（黑
: 人也是），只要罪犯，纵火犯，强奸犯，恐怖分子（黑人）的人权得到保障，黑命贵以
|
|
