u***a
发帖数: 100 | 1 http://www.law360.com/articles/378560/a-look-at-16-years-of-eea
发现一篇文章写经济间谍案16年以来的相关数据，在上面link里面，摘出其中几段：
4) Nationality of the Defendant/Purpose of the Theft
While more than a majority of the individual defendants are U.S. citizens,
there is a “China connection” in a high percentage of the prosecutions. In
particular, more than 20 percent of all of the prosecutions involved
Chinese citizens or naturalized U.S. citizens originally from China. In
addition, in slightly less than 30 percent of the total EEA prosecutions,
the defendant misappropriated the trade secrets to benefit the Chinese
government, an existing Chinese company or to start a company there.
The trend of a China connection is also increasing. Since 2008, the
government has obtained the indictment of approximately 50 cases under both
sections of the EEA and approximately 44 percent of these cases have a China
connection. In 2010, six out of the seven cases that were adjudicated under
the EEA involved a link to China. Further, seven of the nine prosecutions
that the government has brought under § 1831 involve an allegation of
Chinese government involvement.
This does not mean that an entity of the Chinese government was charged in
each case, but that the defendant(s) acted to benefit an entity associated
with the Chinese government. Indeed, as described above, in February 2012
the government unsealed an indictment charging, for the first time, a
company controlled by the Chinese government, the Panang Group, and a number
of individuals violated § 1831 by stealing and attempting to steal trade
secrets from DuPont.[6] Other than China, defendants also intended to
benefit foreign companies in India (2),[7] Dominican Republic (1),[8] Korea
(2),[9] and South Africa (1),[10] under §1832 and Israel[11] and Japan[12]
under § 1831. |
|
