由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
NCAA版 - Who is more intelligent: Human / Machine
相关主题
我早就说过了,不是不相信人俺太土了
数据分析泥瓦客不见了?
还争BCS呢这个preseason #1确实不是个好东西
谁清白,谁纯洁,谁作弊如何argue医疗费用 (转载)
今年三月疯还有点看头prin is awesome!!!
Tamu 典型SEC bias球队这回可以直接25以外了please stop arguing.
the problem of human pollNCAA版是我家,来请教个私人问题
Re: 假设一下Bo is so stupid!
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: human话题: who话题: machine话题: bias话题: ou
进入NCAA版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
w*b
发帖数: 73
1
Arguing with human bias on this last poll is just bullshit. if you have bias,
you can still put OU in #1, or #2, which some voters did. But it turns out
most people put OU at #3. That show how people think of this team at this time
of this season.
But in general, human being has bias, which only make human more human.
Statistically, In a large sample, bias will be cancelled out. Who do you want
to decide your life, human or machine? As for the college football polls, if
people get rid of the rul
1 (共1页)
进入NCAA版参与讨论
相关主题
Bo is so stupid!今年三月疯还有点看头
真是想不到啊 (转载)Tamu 典型SEC bias球队这回可以直接25以外了
你可以argue说SEC是cheat出来的,但不能说the problem of human poll
看来当教授也不能对football太沉迷了Re: 假设一下
我早就说过了,不是不相信人俺太土了
数据分析泥瓦客不见了?
还争BCS呢这个preseason #1确实不是个好东西
谁清白,谁纯洁,谁作弊如何argue医疗费用 (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: human话题: who话题: machine话题: bias话题: ou