t***s
发帖数: 163 | 1 Science 13 March 2009:
Vol. 323. no. 5920, p. 1429
DOI: 10.1126/science.1155416
Prev | Table of Contents | Next
Technical Comments
Comment on "Detection, Stimulation, and Inhibition of Neuronal Signals with
High-Density Nanowire Transistor Arrays"
Peter Fromherz* and Moritz Voelker
Patolsky et al. (Reports, 25 August 2006, p. 1100) used silicon nanowires to
record action potentials in rat neuronal axons and found increases in
conductance of about 85 nanosiemens. We point out that the data co |
m*******r
发帖数: 481 | 2 Eventually somebody comes out to point out Lieber's problem. Hehe. Many of
the Science Nature paper on nanowire devices are bull shit.
with
to
【在 t***s 的大作中提到】
: Science 13 March 2009:
: Vol. 323. no. 5920, p. 1429
: DOI: 10.1126/science.1155416
:
: Prev | Table of Contents | Next
: Technical Comments
: Comment on "Detection, Stimulation, and Inhibition of Neuronal Signals with
: High-Density Nanowire Transistor Arrays"
: Peter Fromherz* and Moritz Voelker
: Patolsky et al. (Reports, 25 August 2006, p. 1100) used silicon nanowires to
|
z*****j
发帖数: 9 | 3 那篇science是把好多人的想法实现了，有条件做这种实验的地方真的不多。开创性大
于实质的意义。 |
t***s
发帖数: 163 | 4 I do not know they are shit or not.
Only hope people working on the field (neuronal signal detected by
semiconductor device) have more discussions.
【在 m*******r 的大作中提到】
: Eventually somebody comes out to point out Lieber's problem. Hehe. Many of
: the Science Nature paper on nanowire devices are bull shit.
:
: with
: to
|
m*******r
发帖数: 481 | 5 NO Wonder. Many Lieber's paper can not be repeated. |
