a*o
发帖数: 25262 | 1 http://ny.worldjournal.com/view/full_nynews/9512026/article-%E5%85%A9%E6%AC%A1%E6%BC%B2%E5%83%B9-MTA%E8%87%AA%E7%A8%B1%E5%90%88%E7%90%86?instance=nymain
大都會運輸署(MTA)政府事務主管Hilary D. Ring13日在市議會交通委員會舉行的公聽
會上表示，MTA面臨巨額的財政赤字，2011和2013年將進行的兩次幅度為7.5%的漲價是
合理的。他也承認MTA員工的福利和收入遠高於市府員工。顧雅明等市議員、乘客權益
組織(Straphangers Campaign)和交通替代方案(Transportation Alternative)等維權
組織向Ring提出了一系列開源節流的建議，Ring表示願意考慮。
MTA今年7月通過的調價計畫中，無限次的一天票和14天票都將被取消。七天票有兩種選
擇，一是無限次乘坐的29元，另一種是最多坐22次的28元。月票的兩種選擇分別為無限
次乘坐的 104元，最多坐90次的99元。獎勵(bonus)票 |
k***a
发帖数: 2258 | 2 The gov should take over MTA. it's not just the MTA problem, public transit
should be gov owned, cuz they should not make money fromn public transit!.
what are all the taxes that we paid for? we can't even get a discount on
public transit? |
a*o
发帖数: 25262 | 3 "MTA的運行預算中有三分之二都是在支付員工的薪水、醫療保險和退休金，他們試
圖與工會代表談判。"
The biggest problem is the union which becomes a lot more powerful. Many of
those Union officials are connected to politicians. The elected officials
need votes, and unions control most of the votes. The candidate whoever wins
the support from unions will be elected.
On the other hand, the MTA management team members are also connected to the
elected officials....Things are more complicated...it's a system involved
many parts/interests, but not
【在 k***a 的大作中提到】
: The gov should take over MTA. it's not just the MTA problem, public transit
: should be gov owned, cuz they should not make money fromn public transit!.
: what are all the taxes that we paid for? we can't even get a discount on
: public transit?
|
n****1
发帖数: 4251 | |
a*o
发帖数: 25262 | 5 好主意.....买了....哈哈.....或者小绵羊也不错.......
【在 n****1 的大作中提到】
: 买自行车吧
|
g*******a
发帖数: 31586 | |
V*****8
发帖数: 33122 | |
