c****t
发帖数: 5452 | 1 就是那个说文章fair,stand by the article的，这回得notes是主编署名的，应该是煽
脸成功了 |
d*****t
发帖数: 7903 | 2 我呼吁为这次nature事件专门做一个wiki专题，所有的细节都要有。
包括编辑的几次删改。 |
g*********o
发帖数: 4653 | 3 早有人做了
马上就被删除了
【在 d*****t 的大作中提到】
: 我呼吁为这次nature事件专门做一个wiki专题，所有的细节都要有。
: 包括编辑的几次删改。
|
L**********r
发帖数: 143 | 4 被谁删除了?
【在 g*********o 的大作中提到】
: 早有人做了
: 马上就被删除了
|
Q*****n
发帖数: 4546 | 5 是删掉了。也解释了改标题和承认系统缺陷；感觉现在的态度比较对了，不象一上来那
么的横，相信这也和各方面持续施加的压力有关。接下来就期待那几个笨蛋付出点代价了
This article has drawn an extraordinary level of outraged response. The
volume of comments has been so great that our online commenting system is
unable to cope: it deletes earlier posts as new ones arrive. We much regret
this ongoing problem. The disappearance of some cogent responses to the
story has fuelled suspicions that Nature is deliberately censoring the
strongest criticisms. This is absolutely not the case: Nature welcomes
critically minded discussion of our content. (We intentionally removed only
a few comments that violated our Community Guidelines by being abusive or
defamatory, including several that offensively stereotyped the many Chinese
readers who commented on the story.)
Many of the commenters have questioned why we changed the original subtitle
of the story from “‘Performance profiling’ could help catch sports cheats
” to “‘Performance profiling’ could help dispel doubts”. The original
version of the title was unfair to the swimmer Ye Shiwen and did not reflect
the substance of the story. We regret that the original appeared in the
first place. We also regret that the original story included an error about
the improvement in Ye’s time for the 400-metre individual medley: she
improved by 7 seconds since July 2011, not July 2012. We have corrected the
error.
We apologize to our readers for these errors, and for the unintended removal
of comments because of technical issues with our commenting system. Below
we reproduce one of the most thorough and thoughtful of the hundreds of
responses we received. Beneath it, we continue with our response. |
c*h
发帖数: 2598 | |
B****A
发帖数: 816 | 7 这个要做
【在 d*****t 的大作中提到】
: 我呼吁为这次nature事件专门做一个wiki专题，所有的细节都要有。
: 包括编辑的几次删改。
|
Q*****n
发帖数: 4546 | 8 也是他们家的，一个女的好象
We are sorry that our news article has offended so many readers. We stand by
the piece and reject suggestions that it was motivated by bias; our
intention was to investigate the science behind a controversy arising from
the current Olympic Games. The first paragraph emphasizes that Ye has never
had a positive drug test and notes that much of the discussion of her win "
has been tinged with racial and political undertones". The last paragraph
quotes an expert saying "When we look at this young swimmer from China who
breaks a world record, that's not proof of anything. It asks a question or
two."
The article is a fair-minded look at a controversy that we did not initiate.
It asks whether new developments in performance monitoring could dispel the
unfortunate suspicions that, these days, the most extraordinary athletic
performance raise, whatever the nationality of the athlete.
Best,
Roseann Campbell
nature
【在 c*h 的大作中提到】
: 最初的editor's note 是谁署名的？
|
g*********o
发帖数: 4653 | 9 wiki的编辑人员贝
后来有人说，wiki得很多编辑人员都是犹太人
他们有段时间专门到以色列招聘鼓励他们做编辑人员
这个世界的媒体，包括美国整个国家，基本上控制在犹太人手里
最近根据一些帖子研究了一下他们这个奥运会的标识和吉祥物
怪异的设计和独眼吉祥物确实反映了Zion锡安长老会（共济会）的主题
犹太人教义盗墨经里就有这么一句话：
The best of goyim(非犹太人） should all be killed.
也许他们的类似口交的zion标示、独眼吉祥物，
是想告诫新一代的犹太人，对所有优秀的非犹太人要赶尽杀绝。
那么善良的中国人，
面对欺负我们骑在我们头上拉屎的犹太和黄蜂，由该如何呢？！
【在 L**********r 的大作中提到】
: 被谁删除了?
|
L**********r
发帖数: 143 | 10 Wiki也能删?
【在 g*********o 的大作中提到】
: 早有人做了
: 马上就被删除了
|
|
|
g*********o
发帖数: 4653 | 11 说了，当时有网友马上跑到wiki Nature词条去编辑Controversy
一会儿就被删掉了
【在 B****A 的大作中提到】
: 这个要做
|
N*****m
发帖数: 42603 | 12 才知道？
看来这次还能教育不少人
【在 L**********r 的大作中提到】
: Wiki也能删?
|
s***e
发帖数: 1343 | 13 别说，nature还是要脸的。还要在江湖上混下去。 |
c****t
发帖数: 5452 | 14 即使没有摆在台面上的处罚，如果这两个主编是明白人的话，内部也会给点压力吧，毕
竟这几个当事人由于各方面能力上的问题给他们惹了不小麻烦
价了
regret
only
【在 Q*****n 的大作中提到】
: 是删掉了。也解释了改标题和承认系统缺陷；感觉现在的态度比较对了，不象一上来那
: 么的横，相信这也和各方面持续施加的压力有关。接下来就期待那几个笨蛋付出点代价了
: This article has drawn an extraordinary level of outraged response. The
: volume of comments has been so great that our online commenting system is
: unable to cope: it deletes earlier posts as new ones arrive. We much regret
: this ongoing problem. The disappearance of some cogent responses to the
: story has fuelled suspicions that Nature is deliberately censoring the
: strongest criticisms. This is absolutely not the case: Nature welcomes
: critically minded discussion of our content. (We intentionally removed only
: a few comments that violated our Community Guidelines by being abusive or
|
L**i
发帖数: 22365 | |
n**********1
发帖数: 1534 | 16 我觉得应该继续到wiki编辑词条，不断的删不断的添加 |
y*****r
发帖数: 1295 | 17 我看这个事件教育懂中文的人比较有价值。
想要改变非我族类的想法，暂时恐怕实现不了。
所以我看可以搞到百度百科之类的地方，把wiki反复删相关词条也放进去。
【在 d*****t 的大作中提到】
: 我呼吁为这次nature事件专门做一个wiki专题，所有的细节都要有。
: 包括编辑的几次删改。
|
g*********o
发帖数: 4653 | 18 支持
不过百度嘛。。有时候也很多公知哦
【在 y*****r 的大作中提到】
: 我看这个事件教育懂中文的人比较有价值。
: 想要改变非我族类的想法，暂时恐怕实现不了。
: 所以我看可以搞到百度百科之类的地方，把wiki反复删相关词条也放进去。
|
