u****d
发帖数: 23938 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Stock 讨论区 】
发信人: tooearly (郎教授不炒股), 信区: Stock
标 题: U.S. law to restrict government purchases of Chinese IT equipment
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Mar 28 10:48:52 2013, 美东)
这个其实值得大家在股版讨论一下。看的我老很气愤，写作风格相当的，贱。
Congress quietly tucked in a new cyber-espionage review process for U.S.
government technology purchases into the funding law signed this week by
President Barack Obama, reflecting growing U.S. concern over Chinese cyber
attacks.
The law prevents NASA, and the Justice and Commerce Departments from buying
information technology systems unless federal law enforcement officials give
their OK.
A provision in the 240-page spending law requires the agencies to make a
formal assessment of "cyber-espionage or sabotage" risk in consultation with
law enforcement authorities when considering buying information technology
systems.
The assessment must include "any risk associated with such system being
produced, manufactured or assembled by one or more entities that are owned,
directed or subsidized" by China.
The U.S. imports a total of about $129 billion worth of "advanced technology
products" from China, according to a May, 2012 report by the Congressional
Research Service.
The amendment to the so-called "continuing resolution" to fund the
government through September 30 originated in the Commerce, Justice and
Science subcommittee of the House of Representatives, chaired by Virginia
Republican Representative Frank Wolf.
It had gotten little attention until a blog post this week by Stewart A.
Baker, a partner in the Washington office of Steptoe & Johhson and a former
Assistant Secretary in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Writing in the Volokh Conspiracy, one of the country's most prominent legal
blogs, Baker wrote on Monday that the measure "could turn out to be a harsh
blow" for Chinese computer-maker Lenovo and also "bring some surprises for
American companies selling commercial IT gear to the government."
U.S. concern about Chinese cyber-attacks has mounted in recent months, with
top officials - including President Barack Obama - vocally condemning the
practice.
Obama raised the issue in a phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping
earlier this month, and told ABC news in an interview that some cyber
security threats are "absolutely" sponsored by governments.
"We've made it very clear to China and some other of the state actors that,
you know, we expect them to follow international norms and abide by
international rules," he said.
Xi said the United States and China should avoid making "groundless
accusations" against each other about cyber-security and work together on
the problem.
The exchange came after U.S. computer security company Mandiant said a
secret Chinese military unit based in Shanghai was the most likely driving
force behind a series of hacking attacks on the United States.
Last year, the House Intelligence Committee released a report urging U.S.
telecommunication companies not to do business with Huawei Technologies Co
Ltd and ZTE Corp because it said potential Chinese state influence on the
companies posed a threat to U.S. security.
Both companies took issue with the report, which Huawei spokesman William
Plummer called "baseless."
Plummer said in an email their reading of the bill is that it "does not
apply to Huawei based on the description of covered entities."
Baker, a technology security lawyer, said he believed the language would
live on in future appropriations bills and possibly get tougher over time.
"Once a provision ends up in the appropriations bill ... it tends to stay
there unless there's a good reason to take it out," Baker said. "We could
easily see (the appropriation committees) tighten up some of the language in
the future."
China could challenge the measure as a violation of World Trade Organization
rules, but may have a tough time making that case because it is not a
member of the WTO agreement setting international rules for government
procurement.
A Chinese government spokesman was not immediately available for comment.
The agreement also contains a national security exemption that would be
another U.S. line of defense against a possible Chinese challenge, Baker
said.
It is possible other countries could raise objections because of the
potential for the provision to prevent purchases of Lenovo computers
manufactured in Germany or Huawei handsets designed in Britain, he said.
But they may decide to tolerate it because of their own concerns about
Chinese hacking, Baker said.
"The goal is not to hurt American and European companies that have
operations in China," said a congressional aide who worked on the House bill
where the wording originated. "It was really targeting entities that are
directed by Beijing," said the aide, who asked not to be identified.
The federal government's purchases, which are funded by taxpayers' money,
are often urged to give preference to vendors that offer the cheapest
services.
The congressional aide said China may heavily subsidize some companies to
present the U.S. market with a much lower price.
"It's a helpful reminder to look at the supply chain" of U.S. firms, the
aide said. "The cheap option may be artificially lowered because potentially
there are ulterior motives."
(Reporting by Alina Selyukh; Editing by Fred Barbash, Bernard Orr) | F********y
发帖数: 7139 | 2 唉，买的那样东西不是美国核心技术然后中国就是装配一下？
这帮人成天吃饱了撑的 | u****d
发帖数: 23938 | 3 对CSCO, DELL利好；
对AAPL,lenovo, Huawei利空。 | r*********n
发帖数: 4553 | 4 TG应该搞思科，不过你想想连great firewall都是思科帮着建的，这要搞谈何容易。 | g*******t
发帖数: 7704 | | d*****0
发帖数: 68029 | 6 我国现在主要搞apple
【在 r*********n 的大作中提到】
: TG应该搞思科，不过你想想连great firewall都是思科帮着建的，这要搞谈何容易。
| T****n
发帖数: 6187 | 7 你装配多了就能自己创新了。老美这是把一切可能的苗头都杀死
【在 F********y 的大作中提到】
: 唉，买的那样东西不是美国核心技术然后中国就是装配一下？
: 这帮人成天吃饱了撑的
| u****d
发帖数: 23938 | 8 思科在中国都不是华为的对手，中国没兴趣；
【在 r*********n 的大作中提到】
: TG应该搞思科，不过你想想连great firewall都是思科帮着建的，这要搞谈何容易。
| g****r
发帖数: 1589 | 9 老美真他妈欺负人啊
没事就说中国攻击美国网络，华为搞间谍活动
尼玛的要是有证据也行，全莫须有、似是而非的结论 | D****X
发帖数: 188 | 10 太好了，我支持美帝全面从印度采购软件、硬件。
【在 g****r 的大作中提到】
: 老美真他妈欺负人啊
: 没事就说中国攻击美国网络，华为搞间谍活动
: 尼玛的要是有证据也行，全莫须有、似是而非的结论
|
|
