由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Pharmaceutical版 - 做biosimilar的怎么知道一个蛋白的具体的gene序列呢?
相关主题
请教一下Mab的质谱分析国内仿制药的投资计划----止增笑尔
包子请教几个Mab糖分析的问题讨论protein engineering在业界的前景
国内制药企业无法进入美国市场的根本原因到底是什么?biostat offer求比较 (转载)
请教一下关于fda批准要新药的事情.大牛小牛们对未来20年有什么看法-大分子 vs 小分子?
做NGS分析在药厂的前景biosimilar in China?
求推荐工作:sicientist @ pharma/biotech (转载)中国特色-先声药业聘臧敬五为首席科学官
Can anybody chat about Biosimilar program at GSK?请高人介绍一下 Process Development
有贵人在Momenta Pharm. 工作么? (转载)欢迎参加华人抗体协会第二届年会
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: biosimilar话题: sequence话题: gene话题: fda话题: 序列
进入Pharmaceutical版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
w*****q
发帖数: 2
1
做biosimilar的公司怎么知道一个蛋白的具体gene序列呢?专利上里有吗?如果有,那
做biosimilar的公司真是拣一大便宜啊。
查了几个,发现paper里的序列上都多少有点出入,到底以什么为准呢?
b******e
发帖数: 3348
2
知道同样的序列和做出同样的蛋白是完全不同的事。

【在 w*****q 的大作中提到】
: 做biosimilar的公司怎么知道一个蛋白的具体gene序列呢?专利上里有吗?如果有,那
: 做biosimilar的公司真是拣一大便宜啊。
: 查了几个,发现paper里的序列上都多少有点出入,到底以什么为准呢?

w*****q
发帖数: 2
3

但是不一样的序列更做不出一样的蛋白吧。

【在 b******e 的大作中提到】
: 知道同样的序列和做出同样的蛋白是完全不同的事。
b******e
发帖数: 3348
4
Are you sure?

【在 w*****q 的大作中提到】
:
: 但是不一样的序列更做不出一样的蛋白吧。

b******1
发帖数: 1116
5
For Biosimilar, process is the prodcut... slightly different gene sequence
does not matter.
A*N
发帖数: 1128
6
And even how do you confirm "the identical", not straightforward
知道同样的序列和做出同样的蛋白是完全不同的事。

【在 w*****q 的大作中提到】
: 做biosimilar的公司怎么知道一个蛋白的具体gene序列呢?专利上里有吗?如果有,那
: 做biosimilar的公司真是拣一大便宜啊。
: 查了几个,发现paper里的序列上都多少有点出入,到底以什么为准呢?

e********r
发帖数: 353
7
如果查不到,做个蛋白测序即可,

【在 w*****q 的大作中提到】
: 做biosimilar的公司怎么知道一个蛋白的具体gene序列呢?专利上里有吗?如果有,那
: 做biosimilar的公司真是拣一大便宜啊。
: 查了几个,发现paper里的序列上都多少有点出入,到底以什么为准呢?

N******o
发帖数: 25
8
The sequence should be identical to the originator's. Otherwise, don't even
think about it's a biosimilar.
Read through recently published FDA guideline draft if you are interested in
this area.

【在 w*****q 的大作中提到】
: 做biosimilar的公司怎么知道一个蛋白的具体gene序列呢?专利上里有吗?如果有,那
: 做biosimilar的公司真是拣一大便宜啊。
: 查了几个,发现paper里的序列上都多少有点出入,到底以什么为准呢?

J****a
发帖数: 553
9
By my understanding, the DNA or amino acid sequence of the biosimilar
product need not be identical to the innovator product for a finding of
biosimilarity under the statute.There may be advantages to using a different
gene sequence that encodes the same protein.
"In general, FDA expects that the expression construct for a proposed
product will encode the same primary amino acid sequence as the reference
product. However, minor modifications such as N- or C-terminal truncations
that will not affect safety and effectiveness may be justified and should be
explained by the sponsor." --Guideline page 9

even
in

【在 N******o 的大作中提到】
: The sequence should be identical to the originator's. Otherwise, don't even
: think about it's a biosimilar.
: Read through recently published FDA guideline draft if you are interested in
: this area.

N******o
发帖数: 25
10
I guess it's OK to have different gene sequence, but final protein sequence
has to be identical, as FDA mentioned. Minor mofification generally referers
to post-translation modification, including glycosylation, C-terminal Lys
truncation for mAb. FDA does gives small rooms for those known modifications
, especially glycosylation. Those have to be justifitable based on bioassay,
preclinical, even clinical data.
Overall, I believe no sequence variation acceptable in term of biosimilar.

different
be

【在 J****a 的大作中提到】
: By my understanding, the DNA or amino acid sequence of the biosimilar
: product need not be identical to the innovator product for a finding of
: biosimilarity under the statute.There may be advantages to using a different
: gene sequence that encodes the same protein.
: "In general, FDA expects that the expression construct for a proposed
: product will encode the same primary amino acid sequence as the reference
: product. However, minor modifications such as N- or C-terminal truncations
: that will not affect safety and effectiveness may be justified and should be
: explained by the sponsor." --Guideline page 9
:

e********r
发帖数: 353
11
如果用不同的基因序列去表达相同的氨基酸,还需要考虑code usage的影响。

different
be

【在 J****a 的大作中提到】
: By my understanding, the DNA or amino acid sequence of the biosimilar
: product need not be identical to the innovator product for a finding of
: biosimilarity under the statute.There may be advantages to using a different
: gene sequence that encodes the same protein.
: "In general, FDA expects that the expression construct for a proposed
: product will encode the same primary amino acid sequence as the reference
: product. However, minor modifications such as N- or C-terminal truncations
: that will not affect safety and effectiveness may be justified and should be
: explained by the sponsor." --Guideline page 9
:

1 (共1页)
进入Pharmaceutical版参与讨论
相关主题
欢迎参加华人抗体协会第二届年会做NGS分析在药厂的前景
2006,制药巨头们难捱的一年求推荐工作:sicientist @ pharma/biotech (转载)
请教,有关peptide/protein 药的几个问题Can anybody chat about Biosimilar program at GSK?
大药厂的business model 现在是什么样有贵人在Momenta Pharm. 工作么? (转载)
请教一下Mab的质谱分析国内仿制药的投资计划----止增笑尔
包子请教几个Mab糖分析的问题讨论protein engineering在业界的前景
国内制药企业无法进入美国市场的根本原因到底是什么?biostat offer求比较 (转载)
请教一下关于fda批准要新药的事情.大牛小牛们对未来20年有什么看法-大分子 vs 小分子?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: biosimilar话题: sequence话题: gene话题: fda话题: 序列