g**********2
发帖数: 133 | 1 前段时间审了一篇APL的稿子，一审是直接拒。但编辑又发给了我修改稿让审稿，并且
附了下面一段话。请问编辑是暗示我接受这篇文章，还是说就只是套路，所有的修改稿
发过来都这么写？个人感觉该论文不够APL档次，并且还有错误。烦请有经验的指点,先
行谢过！
Recently you reviewed the manuscript referenced below for possible
publication in Applied Physics Letters. Your report indicated that revision
was necessary to make the article suitable for publication.
The author has submitted a revised version. Will you look over the revised
material and return it with your recommendation as to the manuscript's
suitability for publication? If you find it unsuitable for publication,
please indicate what further revision is required.
| m**n
发帖数: 9010 | 2 所有的修改稿发过来都这么写.
revision
【在 g**********2 的大作中提到】
: 前段时间审了一篇APL的稿子，一审是直接拒。但编辑又发给了我修改稿让审稿，并且
: 附了下面一段话。请问编辑是暗示我接受这篇文章，还是说就只是套路，所有的修改稿
: 发过来都这么写？个人感觉该论文不够APL档次，并且还有错误。烦请有经验的指点,先
: 行谢过！
: Recently you reviewed the manuscript referenced below for possible
: publication in Applied Physics Letters. Your report indicated that revision
: was necessary to make the article suitable for publication.
: The author has submitted a revised version. Will you look over the revised
: material and return it with your recommendation as to the manuscript's
: suitability for publication? If you find it unsuitable for publication,
|
|
