k***g
发帖数: 7244 | 1 再好的经济Model一被政治学家移植必然出问题，并且问题还是出在政治学家对于model本
身的理解上，读Paul Pierson（哈佛的牛人）移植Douglas
North有感：Pierson认为increasing return最终会导致single equlibrium。呵呵，如果
net return不递减到zero，equilibriun怎么能达到啊？（或许是我理解错了，所以转发
一份到经济版，看看评论：） | c********y
发帖数: 98 | 2 are you talking about pierson's 2000 essay in APSR? Here are my two cents:
1. It seems Pierson is not really talking about "single equilibrium" in this
essay. In fact, I think he's not talking about equilibrium at all, in the
sense that equilibrium is a dot, while going down a path is not a dot. I think
the thrust of the article is:
A. Arthur's idea of increasing return, that each technology generates higher
payoffs for each user as it becomes more prevalent, is widely applicable in
institutiona
【在 k***g 的大作中提到】
: 再好的经济Model一被政治学家移植必然出问题，并且问题还是出在政治学家对于model本
: 身的理解上，读Paul Pierson（哈佛的牛人）移植Douglas
: North有感：Pierson认为increasing return最终会导致single equlibrium。呵呵，如果
: net return不递减到zero，equilibriun怎么能达到啊？（或许是我理解错了，所以转发
: 一份到经济版，看看评论：）
|
|
