由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Quant版 - 请教call option elasticity的一个问题
相关主题
B school 搞 asset pricing 的人在街上做什么这道题, 我做得对马?(stochastic process)
interview questions (leading investing bank)onsite失败,俺就来贡献几道题吧
关于ito integral的一个问题问大家一道数学题(probability)
摩根 电话第二轮(若HR算第一轮)[合集] 问大家一道数学题吧
a stochastic calculus problemcorrelation inequality
来,我来说个面试题[合集] 一道老题(probability)
求教两道某Hedge Fund面试题一道比较有意思的题 -- old question revisit
问个正态分布的面试题讨论下bullettooth的几道题目
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: ds话题: elasticity话题: option话题: call话题: increases
进入Quant版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****w
发帖数: 10
1
想请教一下这里的大牛们,
omega= call option elasticity =(dc/ds)*(s/c)随着 s 增加 递减的图是怎么得来的?
(dc/ds)*(s/c)>1 证明得非常明白,但是为什么随着 s 增加,call option elasticity=(dc/ds)*
(s/c) 递减,我看到 Mcdonald ,hull 只说啦intution,然后给拉numerical example.
但是为什么d[(dc/ds)*(s/c)]/ds <0, 我证明拉好久都没弄出来。这里的牛人多,我
想确认以下,是不是肯定不能证明,只能numerical 画图?如果能证明请大牛给我指点
一下吧。谢谢
l****w
发帖数: 10
2
up
p*****k
发帖数: 318
3
EDITED: sorry the proof below is not correct.
to draw the conclusion that x decreases as S increases, what matters is whether the FRACTIONAL increase of the first term is larger than the second term, i.e., whether
[N(d1) + S*N'(d1)*d(d1)/dS]/[S*N(d1)] > [K*e^{-r(T-t)}*N'(d2)*d(d2)/dS]/[K*e^{-r(T-t)}*N(d2)].
i have not found an easy way to prove this, but i did find one reference in case anyone interested:
Borell, C.(1998) Geometric Inequalities in Option Pricing, MSRI Publications 34, 29–51
whic
m*******n
发帖数: 305
4
This is a very cool proof, thanks!
l****w
发帖数: 10
5
请教 pcasnik,不知道那里错啦?
那应该从什么direction 去证明?谢谢

whether the FRACTIONAL increase of the first term is larger than the second
term, i.e., whether
*e^{-r(T-t)}*N(d2)].
in case anyone interested:
Publications 34, 29–51
is that the payoff function of a call (S-K)^+ is log-concave, which is very
easy to verify.

【在 p*****k 的大作中提到】
: EDITED: sorry the proof below is not correct.
: to draw the conclusion that x decreases as S increases, what matters is whether the FRACTIONAL increase of the first term is larger than the second term, i.e., whether
: [N(d1) + S*N'(d1)*d(d1)/dS]/[S*N(d1)] > [K*e^{-r(T-t)}*N'(d2)*d(d2)/dS]/[K*e^{-r(T-t)}*N(d2)].
: i have not found an easy way to prove this, but i did find one reference in case anyone interested:
: Borell, C.(1998) Geometric Inequalities in Option Pricing, MSRI Publications 34, 29–51
: whic

p*****k
发帖数: 318
6
i meant the original proof below the line is not correct.
(even if A(S) increases faster than B(S) as S increases, it does not mean B/A decreases as S increases. what matters is the fractional change of A and B)
for a proof, you could check Borell(1998), the reference listed above.
1 (共1页)
进入Quant版参与讨论
相关主题
讨论下bullettooth的几道题目a stochastic calculus problem
请教一个矩阵Bound问题,谢谢来,我来说个面试题
Phone interview from Jane street求教两道某Hedge Fund面试题
菜鸟问问题问个正态分布的面试题
B school 搞 asset pricing 的人在街上做什么这道题, 我做得对马?(stochastic process)
interview questions (leading investing bank)onsite失败,俺就来贡献几道题吧
关于ito integral的一个问题问大家一道数学题(probability)
摩根 电话第二轮(若HR算第一轮)[合集] 问大家一道数学题吧
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: ds话题: elasticity话题: option话题: call话题: increases