A*****e
发帖数: 295 | 1 最近看班上讨论vallco mall要建2900个公寓，不知道最终回批准吗？
如果批准的话 感觉学校可能overflow，这种情况下，我猜测学区内部各个高中的边界
可能会变，这个影响可能小些 因为学区内的几个高中都还行
问题是 cupeetino和周边学区的边界有重画的风险吗 |
y*******d
发帖数: 1674 | 2 赶紧去cupertino 图书馆周末签字
【在 A*****e 的大作中提到】
: 最近看班上讨论vallco mall要建2900个公寓，不知道最终回批准吗？
: 如果批准的话 感觉学校可能overflow，这种情况下，我猜测学区内部各个高中的边界
: 可能会变，这个影响可能小些 因为学区内的几个高中都还行
: 问题是 cupeetino和周边学区的边界有重画的风险吗
|
f*********s
发帖数: 51 | 3 请问这个签字是做什么的？学区划分？
: 赶紧去cupertino 图书馆周末签字
【在 y*******d 的大作中提到】
: 赶紧去cupertino 图书馆周末签字
|
y*******d
发帖数: 1674 | 4 反对那个修很多公寓
反对拿掉图书馆budget
【在 f*********s 的大作中提到】
: 请问这个签字是做什么的？学区划分？
:
:
: 赶紧去cupertino 图书馆周末签字
:
|
g*******s
发帖数: 2963 | 5 San Jose 那个shelter上次那么多人去签名最后取消了么？ |
e******r
发帖数: 176 | 6 CU学区能搬进去的人多了 二线学区也会跟着变得不值钱了 |
y*******d
发帖数: 1674 | 7 是的
大家都去签名抗议
每周末在cupertino 图书馆门口
【在 e******r 的大作中提到】
: CU学区能搬进去的人多了 二线学区也会跟着变得不值钱了
|
A*****e
发帖数: 295 | 8 知情的朋友能说说最新的情况吗
好像建筑商搞了个sb35 2400公寓 一半用于低收入家庭
市政府这边搞了个新计划 2900公寓
现在情况怎么样了？ 已经批准了吗 还是大家还可以投票反对？ |
y*******d
发帖数: 1674 | 9 可以周末去cupertino library门口签名反对
还没批准
【在 A*****e 的大作中提到】
: 知情的朋友能说说最新的情况吗
: 好像建筑商搞了个sb35 2400公寓 一半用于低收入家庭
: 市政府这边搞了个新计划 2900公寓
: 现在情况怎么样了？ 已经批准了吗 还是大家还可以投票反对？
|
y*******d
发帖数: 1674 | 10 可以周末去cupertino library门口签名反对
还没批准
【在 A*****e 的大作中提到】
: 知情的朋友能说说最新的情况吗
: 好像建筑商搞了个sb35 2400公寓 一半用于低收入家庭
: 市政府这边搞了个新计划 2900公寓
: 现在情况怎么样了？ 已经批准了吗 还是大家还可以投票反对？
|
|
|
y*******d
发帖数: 1674 | 11 A Vallco Plan worse than 2016 Measure D is coming......
-- 40% bigger in mass;
-- building height 70% taller;
-- almost 4 times more housing units;
-- school benefits halved
-- very limited park land as required
CALL for ACTION
It's not too late to SAY NO!
1. Attend City Council Meeting on September 18
2. Donate to BC or BC supported candidates
3. Write email to City Council
4. Visit BC booth in front of Library on weekend
~ T A K E A C T I O N ~
Public Hearing of Vallco Project will take place on September 18th City
Council Meeting
Please refer to September 18 City Council meeting details. Vallco Town
Center Special Area plan will be discussed in item 17 on September 18th.
Please attend the meeting and wear **RED** to oppose such a high density
development proposal.
The project impacts:
10,000-12,000 workers or 8,000 new residents (about 1/3 of Cupertino’s
population) crammed into less than 1/10 of a sq. mile.
Much worse traffic congestion: Adding 1/3 more commute traffic to already
congested traffic.
Much more dangerous school traffic. Adding about 1000 K-8 students to
commute to lower enrollment schools from already overcrowded schools near
Vallco.
Worse housing shortage: The amount of office creates worse housing
deficiency, which will trigger more high-density projects under aggressive
state laws.to streamline more high-density projects with no infrastructure
support. Cycle of abuse.
Parking nightmare: Nearby shopping centers and nearby neighborhoods will
become parking lot for Vallco tenants, workers and customers.
More tax burden for resident: Tens Millions of dollars to finish the
interior of the Performing Art Center and continuing operating cost. Tens
Millions of dollars to finish the interior of the City Hall. The City will
go into debt while the much needed Library Expansion would never happen.
More property tax increase to expand the already-at-capacity sewage system.
Higher water rate, on top of the projected 10% increase per year. More
county-wide bond measure to fix worse traffic condition. More spending for
police and emergency service who have to cut through more congested traffic.
~ T A K E A C T I O N ~
Donate to Better Cupertino or BC supported candidates:
Jon Willey, Liang Chao!
Even if the vote of Vallco plan postponed, there have to be 3 votes in City
Council on residents side to force developer to negotiate again. Please vote
for BC supported candidates to make it happen!
Please make donation NOW to:
Better Cupertino, Jon Willey or Liang Chao.
They URGENTLY need your help to defeat developer funded candidates!
~ T A K E A C T I O N ~
Write to City Council to say NO to current Vallco proposal.
Please write to Cupertino City Council to oppose current Vallco proposal. If
you don't speak up, the council will only hear from developer side. Please
make your voice to be heard!
You can read Better Cupertino Blog to get more details on this Vallco
Specific Plan.
PLEASE NOTE: The SB 35 application needs to comply with the General Plan and
the Housing Affordability Act. But Sand Hill Properties continues to act as
if the SB-35 application is compliant while at the same time push the City
to approve the much denser Vallco Specific Plan. If the SB 35 application
were truly compliant, Sand Hill should be in no rush to push through the
much denser Vallco Specific Plan.
Some Cupertino residents have filed a lawsuit against the City’s “approval
” of the Vallco Town Center SB 35 application because the application is
not compliant with the law. Recognize the Vallco Town Center SB 35
application for the bluff the property owner likely intends.
Don’t fall for it. Instead, STAND UP for your community
~ T A K E A C T I O N ~
Visit Better Cupertino booth in front of Library every Sat. & Sun. 11am-6pm
Please visit Better Cupertino booth and learn more about Vallco project
status.
Sign the "Destination Retail" petition for a community-friendly Vallco.
Be prepared to sign the official referendum once Cupertino City Council
approves the Vallco Specific Plan, which may happen in a few weeks. |
y*******d
发帖数: 1674 | 12 A Vallco Plan worse than 2016 Measure D is coming......
-- 40% bigger in mass;
-- building height 70% taller;
-- almost 4 times more housing units;
-- school benefits halved
-- very limited park land as required
CALL for ACTION
It's not too late to SAY NO!
1. Attend City Council Meeting on September 18
2. Donate to BC or BC supported candidates
3. Write email to City Council
4. Visit BC booth in front of Library on weekend
~ T A K E A C T I O N ~
Public Hearing of Vallco Project will take place on September 18th City
Council Meeting
Please refer to September 18 City Council meeting details. Vallco Town
Center Special Area plan will be discussed in item 17 on September 18th.
Please attend the meeting and wear **RED** to oppose such a high density
development proposal.
The project impacts:
10,000-12,000 workers or 8,000 new residents (about 1/3 of Cupertino’s
population) crammed into less than 1/10 of a sq. mile.
Much worse traffic congestion: Adding 1/3 more commute traffic to already
congested traffic.
Much more dangerous school traffic. Adding about 1000 K-8 students to
commute to lower enrollment schools from already overcrowded schools near
Vallco.
Worse housing shortage: The amount of office creates worse housing
deficiency, which will trigger more high-density projects under aggressive
state laws.to streamline more high-density projects with no infrastructure
support. Cycle of abuse.
Parking nightmare: Nearby shopping centers and nearby neighborhoods will
become parking lot for Vallco tenants, workers and customers.
More tax burden for resident: Tens Millions of dollars to finish the
interior of the Performing Art Center and continuing operating cost. Tens
Millions of dollars to finish the interior of the City Hall. The City will
go into debt while the much needed Library Expansion would never happen.
More property tax increase to expand the already-at-capacity sewage system.
Higher water rate, on top of the projected 10% increase per year. More
county-wide bond measure to fix worse traffic condition. More spending for
police and emergency service who have to cut through more congested traffic.
~ T A K E A C T I O N ~
Donate to Better Cupertino or BC supported candidates:
Jon Willey, Liang Chao!
Even if the vote of Vallco plan postponed, there have to be 3 votes in City
Council on residents side to force developer to negotiate again. Please vote
for BC supported candidates to make it happen!
Please make donation NOW to:
Better Cupertino, Jon Willey or Liang Chao.
They URGENTLY need your help to defeat developer funded candidates!
~ T A K E A C T I O N ~
Write to City Council to say NO to current Vallco proposal.
Please write to Cupertino City Council to oppose current Vallco proposal. If
you don't speak up, the council will only hear from developer side. Please
make your voice to be heard!
You can read Better Cupertino Blog to get more details on this Vallco
Specific Plan.
PLEASE NOTE: The SB 35 application needs to comply with the General Plan and
the Housing Affordability Act. But Sand Hill Properties continues to act as
if the SB-35 application is compliant while at the same time push the City
to approve the much denser Vallco Specific Plan. If the SB 35 application
were truly compliant, Sand Hill should be in no rush to push through the
much denser Vallco Specific Plan.
Some Cupertino residents have filed a lawsuit against the City’s “approval
” of the Vallco Town Center SB 35 application because the application is
not compliant with the law. Recognize the Vallco Town Center SB 35
application for the bluff the property owner likely intends.
Don’t fall for it. Instead, STAND UP for your community
~ T A K E A C T I O N ~
Visit Better Cupertino booth in front of Library every Sat. & Sun. 11am-6pm
Please visit Better Cupertino booth and learn more about Vallco project
status.
Sign the "Destination Retail" petition for a community-friendly Vallco.
Be prepared to sign the official referendum once Cupertino City Council
approves the Vallco Specific Plan, which may happen in a few weeks. |
s********y
发帖数: 403 | 13 不是说启动SB35就可以强行通过？能科普下到底是什么情况吗？
【在 y*******d 的大作中提到】
: 赶紧去cupertino 图书馆周末签字
|
r*y
发帖数: 1 | |
n********g
发帖数: 6504 | 15 只要低收入房达到一定比例就可以by right强行通过。这已经是法律。
发展商为了达到这个比例、支付高工资福利、又要保证利润，就需要造更多的住宅单位。
“交通房”地区贫民化和治安恶化是普世规律。
没有SB35也会有SCA53。
【在 s********y 的大作中提到】
: 不是说启动SB35就可以强行通过？能科普下到底是什么情况吗？
|
n********g
发帖数: 6504 | 16 如果是SB35 by right通过，我没见到哪里说需要另外付钱给学区修建新学校。
理论上发展商需要支付“很便宜”的学位费，以及有地税收入。不过地税不都用于本学
区，以及低收入房屋的市值地税都低。
【在 r*y 的大作中提到】
: 需要建新学校么？
:
: ：
: ：
|
L**********r
发帖数: 1 | 17 MSJ也是交通房 毕竟开到雨中才20分钟
: 只要低收入房达到一定比例就可以by right强行通过。这已经是法律。
: 发展商为了达到这个比例、支付高工资福利、又要保证利润，就需要造更多的住
宅单位。
: “交通房”地区贫民化和治安恶化是普世规律。
: 没有SB35也会有SCA53。
【在 n********g 的大作中提到】
: 如果是SB35 by right通过，我没见到哪里说需要另外付钱给学区修建新学校。
: 理论上发展商需要支付“很便宜”的学位费，以及有地税收入。不过地税不都用于本学
: 区，以及低收入房屋的市值地税都低。
|
n********g
发帖数: 6504 | 18 MSJ没有PA、CU那么drama queen。是比廊坊近，到雨中和通州距离天安门差不多。三藩
和雨中距离相当于北京-天津还有不少人每天通勤呢。
别怕，雨中密度会越来越高。如果能挤到通州，就算没北京的密度，20多公里呢，几个
方向加塞百万通勤不起的贫民进去问题不大。
换个角度看，到PA、CU做房东的就是怕生活太平淡。有问题可以BSO啊。我们要罢免议
员、市长、法官。
我顺便奉劝MSJ家长，无聊也别和唯恐天下不乱的CU某些人凑合。人家的确有问题我们
同情。我们没问题就成了无病呻吟。
【在 L**********r 的大作中提到】
: MSJ也是交通房 毕竟开到雨中才20分钟
:
:
: 只要低收入房达到一定比例就可以by right强行通过。这已经是法律。
:
: 发展商为了达到这个比例、支付高工资福利、又要保证利润，就需要造更多的住
: 宅单位。
:
: “交通房”地区贫民化和治安恶化是普世规律。
:
: 没有SB35也会有SCA53。
:
|
r*y
发帖数: 1 | 19 上班难道不是往mtv或者237沿线或者san jose downtown之类地方开。尼玛谁往
sunnyvale居民区开。。
：MSJ也是交通房 毕竟开到雨中才20分钟
： |
g*******s
发帖数: 2963 | 20 所谓交通房不都是针对公司位置么？
现在湾区几大交通方房原动力：
mtv 狗
cupertino 果
pa 脸
sf startup
还有别的么？ |
L**********r
发帖数: 1 | 21 雨中全都有
狗 果 软 马鬃 linkdin 未来fb也会掺合进来
: 所谓交通房不都是针对公司位置么？
: 现在湾区几大交通方房原动力：
: mtv 狗
: cupertino 果
: pa 脸
: sf startup
: 还有别的么？
【在 g*******s 的大作中提到】
: 所谓交通房不都是针对公司位置么？
: 现在湾区几大交通方房原动力：
: mtv 狗
: cupertino 果
: pa 脸
: sf startup
: 还有别的么？
|
N******2
发帖数: 376 | 22 苹果雨中7000的四个圆圈好像差不多了，什么时候进人？是不是到时候旁边townhouse
和抗都会出现风抢小高潮 |
