n*****g
发帖数: 25 | 1 "The 1956 award was given to Yang and Lee"
Yang and Lee break their friendship for a long time.
Subjectively, this is both a sad and shameful thing.
Regardless the integrity or moral issus of human being, who do you think is a
more competent Physists? who do you guess contribute more to their Nobel
price?
I have heard a seminar by Lee, he looks like a saleman. I also heard a seminar
by Lee's son who is a chem professor, really really mediocre.
Of course, if you have opinion about Yang and Lee's | e***y
发帖数: 273 | 2 Lee contributed more to Nobel Prize.
However, Yang definately should get Nobel prize even without their
Lee_Yang cooperation in weak interaction. Yang should get Nobel prize in his
Yang-Mills theory.
Both Lee and Yang had done lots of works after Nobel.
Maybe Yang's is a little more, since Yang-Mills theory is very important.
(Probably the most important theory in particle physics)
(In fact, Yang was nominated for Nobel Prize again because of Yang-Mills
theory, however, he did not get a second N
【在 n*****g 的大作中提到】
: "The 1956 award was given to Yang and Lee"
: Yang and Lee break their friendship for a long time.
: Subjectively, this is both a sad and shameful thing.
: Regardless the integrity or moral issus of human being, who do you think is a
: more competent Physists? who do you guess contribute more to their Nobel
: price?
: I have heard a seminar by Lee, he looks like a saleman. I also heard a seminar
: by Lee's son who is a chem professor, really really mediocre.
: Of course, if you have opinion about Yang and Lee's
| l**********n
发帖数: 72 | 3 Contrary to what you said, I believed Yang contributed more in the parity
violation in weak interactions. And I also trusted Yang more than Lee. Here
are my reasons:
1) You can find their own description of the cooperation in parity violation
from Lee's book "30 years after Parity violation in weak interactions", which
is a collection of many papers to celebrate Lee's 60 year birthday. And you
can also find the corresponding articles in Yang's selection of papers. In
Lee's description, he stress
【在 e***y 的大作中提到】
: Lee contributed more to Nobel Prize.
: However, Yang definately should get Nobel prize even without their
: Lee_Yang cooperation in weak interaction. Yang should get Nobel prize in his
: Yang-Mills theory.
: Both Lee and Yang had done lots of works after Nobel.
: Maybe Yang's is a little more, since Yang-Mills theory is very important.
: (Probably the most important theory in particle physics)
: (In fact, Yang was nominated for Nobel Prize again because of Yang-Mills
: theory, however, he did not get a second N
|
|
