l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 By James Lewis
We’ve just watched Obama commit an act of imperialistic aggression against
a peaceful sovereign state. Mubarak’s Egypt threatened no one. It was the
great pillar of stability in the Middle East for thirty years. Its
government was far more civilized than Iran, China, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan,
and fifty other corrupt and tyrannical members of the United Nations.
Obama’s whole spiel to the Left has been that he is an anti-colonial
socialist; that’s why he wrote Dreams from My Father. Obama Sr. was a big
anti-colonialist. Obama has claimed (at various times) to be the new Nelson
Mandela, as well as the new Abe Lincoln, and most recently, the new Ronald
Reagan.
But Reagan worked to liberate the oppressed peoples of Eastern Europe from
Soviet tyranny. Barack Obama has now pushed, and pushed, and pushed to
overthrow the government of a sovereign Muslim nation, the only Arab power
to ever sign a peace treaty with Israel.
According to the lickspittles of the New York Times, this must be a great
victory for democracy. They have failed to explain why that must be; instead
, they’ve been chasing headlines, along with the other idiot media. But
there hasn’t even been an election in Egypt. Obama didn’t demand an
election, and when Mubarak promised free and fair elections he was
contemptuously turned down -- not by the people of Egypt, but by Washington,
D.C.
The Tahrir Square mob was coordinated by a 30 year old Arabic-speaking
Google executive. The Mu-Bros will now get a big vote -- like Hitler and the
Turkish Muslim Brothers -- because Egyptians have been taught to believe
all of the Mu-Bros fondest fascist beliefs. Egypt’s Muslim Brothers have
already called for war with Israel.
Egypt is now a carbon copy of the way in Turkey, Gaza and Iran were taken
over by the Muslim totalitarians. Turkey had excellent relations with Israel
and Europe before the Brotherhood took over. Today it is an Islamofascist
ally of Iran against the civilized world.
When Communists like Lenin committed aggression they re-defined the word “
imperialism.” According to Lenin, Marxist tyrannies could never be
imperialistic, no matter how many Ukrainians, Czechs, and Poles they
murdered. That is why the Soviet Empire was never allowed to be called what
it was: An Empire. Its abject colonial subjects in Eastern Europe are still
afraid today of another Russian imperial assault.
Communists can’t be imperialistic, no matter how much they act like Nazi
Germany. That is how the Communists conquered China, Cambodia, South Vietnam
, and all the rest with no criticism in the West. You see, Communist
imperialism was good imperialism.
Enter Obama. What Obama just did was encourage a twittered revolt against
Mubarak, and then publicly, brutally, in the most humiliating way, order him
to resign. Joe Stalin would have been proud. So would Mao Zedong. This is
what the Soviets tried to do all around the world.
Obama has now turned the United States into a Leftist Imperialist power.
What’s his purpose? It can only be one. Obama believes the nonsense that
all the problems of the Middle East would be solved if only Israel
compromises enough with its deadliest enemies. Obama does not care about the
fascist regime in Iran. When peaceful protesters were thronging the streets
of Tehran last year he did nothing. It’s not a popular government that he
cares about.
Rather, Obama and the radical Left are forging another Communist-Fascist
alliance, exactly like the Hitler-Stalin Pact of 1938, which split up Poland
and started World War Two. The new Red-Black alliance links the Radical
Left with the Muslim radicals who attacked us on 9/11.
While the media are covering up this reality, we can see it all over the
place: In the Ground Zero mosque, in the insane Congressional testimony by
our DNI Clapper, that the Mu-Bros are “secular,” and in any number of
other media-supported lies that serve only Muslim fascists and hard Leftists
around the world.
In politics the question is always “Cui Bono?” -- Whom does it serve? And
when you look at Obama’s brutal imperialistic push to get rid of Mubarak
over the last several weeks, you know exactly whom it serves.
It serves radical Islam, because the Muslim Brothers now have a clear path
to power in Egypt. They already control Turkey, Gaza, and soon, the West
Bank of the Jordan River. Jordan has played a moderating role in the Middle
East for generations; it is now threatened by a radical Muslim revolt.
This is Obama’s route to imperial power. It is consistent with all his
actions in the last two years, and particularly with today’s public
humiliation of the strongest Arab power in the world.
Obama’s ego is Napoleonic. He needs to expand his power without limits.
That’s the nature of malignant narcissism.
Civilized and democratic peoples suffer when Napoleonic characters take
power. We can’t see the end game yet. This might or might not end in a
major war or worse. But we have a riverboat gambler running the ship of
state, and he loves to play with the power of “audacity.”
That was Napoleon’s motto: “L’audace, l’audace, toujours l’laudace.”
Which worked fine for Napoleon’s field marshals, but not so well for all
the defeated peoples of Europe and the Middle East. And in the end, Napoleon
’s audacity died in the snows of the Russian winter.
With the radical Obama administration, the United States has now embarked on
a perilous course. Instead of keeping the dominoes from toppling, Obama is
malignantly pushing them into the arms of Islamic radicals. That kind of
gamble has never before worked to the betterment of humanity.
On the contrary: It has always led to disaster before.
Whether Obama the magic trickster can now pull it off in the nuclearizing
Middle East is very doubtful, and therefore very dangerous. |
|
