y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 1 小左读的书还是太少...
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870453500457534864
Lessons From the Swedish Welfare State
Americans are debating whether to substantially expand the size of their
government. As Swedish economists who live in the developed world's largest
welfare state, we urge our friends in the New World to look carefully before
they leap.
Fifty years ago, Sweden and America spent about the same on their government
, a bit under 30% of GDP. This is no longer true. In the years leading up to
Sweden's financial crisis in the early 1990s, government spending went as
high as 60% of GDP. In America it barely budged, increasing only to about 33
%.
While America was maintaining its standing as one of the world's wealthiest
nations, Sweden's standing fell. In 1970, Sweden was the fourth richest
country in the world on a per capita basis. By 1993, it had fallen to 17th.
This led us to ask whether Sweden's dramatic increase in the size of
government contributed to its sluggish growth. Our research shows that it
did. ...
The weight of the evidence demonstrates that when government spending
increases by 10 percentage points of GDP, the annual growth rate drops by 0.
5 to 1 percentage point. This may not sound like much, but over 30 years
this would result in the loss of trillions of dollars each year in an
economy as large as America's. ...
We also investigated the claim that Sweden is proof that big government
does not harm the economy. While Sweden has done very well compared to other
developed countries in the last 15 years, it has also implemented sweeping
pro-market reforms. Examples include a national system of free school choice
based on vouchers up through senior year of high school, a financially
stable public pension system that can adjust payouts if contributions to the
system fall for some reason, and comprehensive tax reform that has lowered
marginal tax rates tremendously. ...
Sweden's recent growth is thus the result of opting for free-market
solutions instead of growing government. ...
Many Americans argue that the U.S. could safely increase its spending share
from roughly 32% of GDP to 37%–38% of GDP. The evidence suggests otherwise
. The U.S. needs to acknowledge the trade-off between government size and
economic growth. A larger government sector may decrease some economic
inequality, but will ultimately leave Americans sharing smaller pieces of a
smaller pie. | y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 2 都是翻来覆去辩过多少回的东西了.
还在那里闭门造车...
largest
before
government
to
【在 y****t 的大作中提到】
: 小左读的书还是太少...
: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870453500457534864
: Lessons From the Swedish Welfare State
: Americans are debating whether to substantially expand the size of their
: government. As Swedish economists who live in the developed world's largest
: welfare state, we urge our friends in the New World to look carefully before
: they leap.
: Fifty years ago, Sweden and America spent about the same on their government
: , a bit under 30% of GDP. This is no longer true. In the years leading up to
: Sweden's financial crisis in the early 1990s, government spending went as
| a*******1
发帖数: 1554 | 3 它只是说了30年来瑞典排名下降了，政府支出提高了，但不表明这两者之间有任何关系
。。。。
我够可以说美国由于老墨生小孩多，人口增长块，促进了经济增长；瑞典人不生小孩，
导致人口老龄化，经济增长放缓。。。
我还可以说，瑞典90年代遭遇金融危机，后来因为加强金融监管，因此避免了2008年的
冲击；否则瑞典在08年遭受的打击更大，毕竟他们是经济高度外向型的国家。。。
别忘了瑞典人均GDP也是排前10的，挪威还排第4呢。。。。由于税收高，贫富差距小，
福利高，活得好，大家心情愉快，于是努力工作，全民幸福；哪像美国人，要么看老黑
老墨吃福利心里不爽，要么看高管年如千万心情不爽，天天郁闷，抱怨连天。。。。。
。 | c**********d
发帖数: 2428 | | y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 5 小左一张嘴,满嘴喷粪,这样的人居然还能找到工作真是太不公平了.
lol...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per
1 Qatar 88,222
...
4 Norway 51,959
7 United States 46,860
8 Switzerland 41,950
=========================
16 Sweden 38,204
小左别不是连瑞典/瑞士都搞不清楚... | y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 6 这也太烂了,
搞不好是个什么firm里面坐前台的吧...
【在 y****t 的大作中提到】
: 小左一张嘴,满嘴喷粪,这样的人居然还能找到工作真是太不公平了.
: lol...
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per
: 1 Qatar 88,222
: ...
: 4 Norway 51,959
: 7 United States 46,860
: 8 Switzerland 41,950
: =========================
: 16 Sweden 38,204
| a*******1
发帖数: 1554 | 7 我记错了而已，又不是先查的。。。再说，挪威瑞士都是高福利的，只能说瑞典福利还
不够高，所以排后面去了，别忘了2006年至今瑞典是右派执政，所以退步了。。。
【在 y****t 的大作中提到】
: 小左一张嘴,满嘴喷粪,这样的人居然还能找到工作真是太不公平了.
: lol...
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per
: 1 Qatar 88,222
: ...
: 4 Norway 51,959
: 7 United States 46,860
: 8 Switzerland 41,950
: =========================
: 16 Sweden 38,204
|
|
