l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 June 6, 2012 by Warner Todd Huston
[Ed note: Ray Bradbury passed on last night. He was 91. In celebration of
his life and work, I'll repost this article that I wrote in August of 2010.]
The L.A. Times has a heartwarming story of literary giant Ray Bradbury who
at 90 is not afraid to tell everyone exactly what he thinks. A gathering of
admirers got an earful of Bradburyisms on the verge of his Aug 22 90th
birthday celebration in Los Angeles. Bradbury railed against the “too many
machines” that we surround ourselves with, lamented that we hadn’t
colonized the moon by now, and said that the U.S. is in need of a revolution
because “there is too much government today.”
You have to hand it to this wizened sage. He hit the nail on the head with
every statement. Bradbury is so right to point out that we are losing our
American soul and character.
Here are his statements as reported by the Times:
He (Obama) should be announcing that we should go back to the moon. We
should never have left there. We should go to the moon and prepare a base to
fire a rocket off to Mars and then go to Mars and colonize Mars. Then when
we do that, we will live forever.
I think our country is in need of a revolution. There is too much government
today. We’ve got to remember the government should be by the people, of
the people and for the people.
We have too many cellphones. We’ve got too many Internets. We have got to
get rid of those machines. We have too many machines now.
I was approached three times during the last year by Internet companies
wanting to put my books [E-book readers]I said to Yahoo, ‘Prick up your
ears and go to hell.’
Another of my favorite Bradbury quotes goes like this: “I don’t believe in
colleges and universities. I believe in libraries.”
The man is clearly an individualist and not a collectivist.
Naturally the misinformed, and those unable to think clearly — by that I
mean liberals — think that Bradbury is an old coot that is off his rocker.
How can he say we should be going back to the moon but still be against “
big government,” they fume. This is a simpleton’s point, the sort of
idiotic, childish talking point that one would expect from halfwits like
Keith Olbermann or Media Matters.
You see, Bradbury did not say he’s against “government.” He never said
that government has no role in life. It is possible to be against welfare
spending, the so-called stimulus, and Obama’s ever growing tendrils of Big
Brotherism without thinking that government shouldn’t help fund a space
program. Further, Bradbury did not state that only government can get us
back to the moon, either.
The unthinking lefties chastising Bradbury also focused on the seeming
incongruity of a celebrated science fiction author being against the
permeation of machines in our lives. How could he be against fantastic
machines and be a sci fi writer they burble.
Clearly these people have never once read a Bradbury book. Sure Bradbury
used the vehicle of science and sophisticated technology with his stories
but his true intent was always aimed at exploring the human condition and
arguing for the rights of the individual. If nothing else, Fahrenheit 451
fits this model. The tome warns the reader of a totalitarian state and
presents the despotism as being disseminated by machines. Bradbury has for
decades warned that man should beware of being dominated by his own
creations, that man should be their master not their slave.
Like many authors and philosophers ruminating about the human animal,
Bradbury laments man’s reluctance to explore the sublimity that is our
existence and he decries our lack of interest as a species in the search for
beauty. It is an ages old lament, one that the ancient Greek, Roman, and
early Christian philosophers also explored. But in our hurry up world of
Kindle readers, Internet connections, Facebook, and that horrid texting
business, we too easily ignore the examined life that we should be leading.
And being so powerfully for old fashioned books while eschewing e-readers?
How is it a sci fi guy can be so against e-readers? Let’s face it, there is
something infinitely more pleasing about holding a book in your hands.
There is something far more permanent about flipping a cover, turning a page
, dog-earing that page then there is in holding an e-reading machine. The
tactile feel of a book surpasses that of an e-reader for a sense of being.
Lose a battery and you have nothing but a hunk of electronic junk with an e-
reader. As time moves on e-readers will get out of date and its data will no
longer be readable on other machines. But a book? Unlike an e-reader a book
will be usable 100 years from now. It makes sense for a traditionalist like
Bradbury to eschew e-readers. It should be unsurprising to anyone.
Now I am sorry for all those simpleminded lefties out there upset at
Bradbury for his blunt and spot-on comments. I am sorry that they are not
sophisticated enough to understand that the warnings of this aged elder
statesman of the literary world are worth considering.
And I leave you unthinking lefties with Bradbury’s line above that is as
cantankerous as it is amusing: “Prick up your ears and go to hell.” |
|
