l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 by Rick aka Mr. Brutally Honest
It should come as no surprise to those who think, who don't emote, who have
a firm grasp of reality and aren't high on narcotics that she was biased.
Politico:
Amid persistent complaints and interruptions from both candidates,
President Obama ultimately got Candy-crowleymore than three extra minutes of
speaking time than Mitt Romney during Tuesday's debate.
According to CNN's timekeeping, Obama got 44:04 minutes of speaking time
, while Romney got 40:50.
If my my math is correct, that's nearly 10% more time given Obama.
But wait, there's more.
Breitbart:
In the first presidential debate, Jim Lehrer, no slouch at shilling for
the Democratic Party, interrupted Mitt Romney 15 times and Barack Obama only
five.
Crowley made Lehrer look like an amateur. She interrupted Obama nine
times, (although four of those were when he wouldn’t respect the time limit
when discussing assault weapons; he went over his time limit all night long
), but when it came to Mitt Romney, she was utterly beyond the pale.
Crowley interrupted Romney 28 times. 28 times. Her desperation to keep
Romney from scoring points was so patently obvious that it wasn’t really a
surprise when she had her infamous moment: the moment when she interrupted
and falsely claimed Romney was incorrect in accusing Obama of refusing to
call the Benghazi attack an act of terror.
Again, check my math but that's more than twice the number of interruptions.
Clearly, Ms. Crowley was doing what the media is known now to do.
Shill for their liberal co-ideologues. Run interference for them. Do what
they can to help the Democrats and hinder the Republicans.
It's undeniable.
And rather sickening. |
|
